experiment-execution
Skill52 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Execute AI/ML experiments locally or remotely with environment, runtime, and logging controls. Prefer invoking via research-workflow. TRIGGER when: user asks to run/launch/start/resume/monitor a training job, evaluation, or benchmark, or a plan is ready for execution, or experiment needs rerun/recovery. DO NOT TRIGGER when: research investigation only (use deep-research), planning without execution (use research-plan), or env setup without launch (use project-context).
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- NVIDIA/Quantum-Calibration-Agent-Blueprinttheir own version, first seen Apr 20, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- NVIDIA/Quantum-Calibration-Agent-Blueprint★ 69same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- deep-researchSkill
- human-checkpointSkill
- memory-managerSkill
- paper-writingSkill
- project-contextSkill
- research-planSkill
- research-workflowSkill
- run-governorSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
35 rules. About 0 are common, 26 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈26
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
9
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Run experiments safely, reproducibly, and mode-aware, with clear run paths and traceable evidence.
- Distinctive: line 33
Ask only missing questions.
- Distinctive: line 37
Use shared run_id from run-governor:
- Distinctive: line 53
Use smoke validation only when needed:
- Distinctive: line 55
when launch details are incomplete
- Distinctive: line 56
when environment readiness is uncertain
- Distinctive: line 57
when cost/risk of full run is high
- Distinctive: line 59
If setup is clear and safe, direct execution is allowed.
- Distinctive: line 69
If the launched action is long-running, immediately enter watch mode instead of treating launch as completion.
- Distinctive: line 70
After each poll, continue with monitoring, diagnosis, recovery, or result collection.
- Distinctive: line 77
After launching a long-running job:
- Very specific: line 82
if running, choose the next sleep interval and continue watching
- Very specific: line 83
if completed, inspect outputs and continue validation/analysis
- Very specific: line 84
if stalled, inspect evidence, retrieve memory, and attempt recovery or replan
- Very specific: line 85
if failed, diagnose immediately and attempt the smallest safe recovery
- Distinctive: line 86
ask the user only for hard blockers, major safety/resource approvals, or true decision points
- Distinctive: line 87
only allow explicit fire-and-forget behavior when the user clearly requested it
- Distinctive: line 91
Use this template after each experiment poll:
- Very specific: line 93
read status, followup_action, progress_changed, and last_log_tail
- Distinctive: line 110
update route and continue execution
- Distinctive: line 111
write working state update before the next wait or recovery attempt
- Distinctive: line 112
do not stop at "job is still running" unless fire-and-forget was explicitly requested
- Distinctive: line 118
When the task is iterative optimization:
- Distinctive: line 125
prefer broader representative sets over a few hand-picked cases
- Distinctive: line 127
run the current gate set
- Very specific: line 131
if the new result is the best-so-far and the user requested preservation, snapshot the relevant prompt/config/code/results before the next …
- Distinctive: line 132
if the current gate is unmet, do not stop merely because one iteration completed cleanly
- Distinctive: line 133
only hand back to the user when:
- Distinctive: line 140
When execution fails with unknown error:
- Very specific: line 154
Use remote profile reuse decision from run-governor.
- Distinctive: line 171
When the deliverable includes data analysis results:
- Distinctive: line 173
run visualization analysis on the computed metrics/tables before final delivery
- Very specific: line 175
keep runtime-generated source figures under <runtime_project_root>/runs/<run_id>/artifacts/figures/
- Very specific: line 177
prefer stable filenames such as <topic>-<metric>.png or <topic>-<metric>.svg
- Distinctive: line 181
Do not launch full run when required inputs are still unknown and not explicitly waived.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Experiment Execution
Mission
Run experiments safely, reproducibly, and mode-aware, with clear run paths and traceable evidence.
References
Read when needed:
references/experiment-launch-checklist.mdreferences/remote-info-template.md
Required Inputs
Collect minimum safe inputs:
- execution target (
local|remote) - local project root
- runtime project root (required when remote)
- single-node or multi-node
- proxy requirement
- tracker/login requirement
Ask only missing questions.
Run Path Policy
Use shared run_id from run-governor:
- control logs and stage reports:
<codex-cwd>/logs/runs/<run_id>/ - experiment outputs:
<runtime_project_root>/runs/<run_id>/ - project-context snapshots and secrets:
<local_project_root>/.project_local/<project_slug>/
In local execution, runtime_project_root can be equal to local_project_root.
Mode-Aware Interaction
full-auto: proceed without confirmation unless hard blocker or major safety risk.moderate: confirm before high-resource actions.detailed: confirm for unclear plans and high-resource actions.
Smoke Validation Policy
Use smoke validation only when needed:
- when launch details are incomplete
- when environment readiness is uncertain
- when cost/risk of full run is high
If setup is clear and safe, direct execution is allowed.
Execution Policy
- Confirm real execution vs dry-run.
- Confirm required inputs.
- Inspect scripts/configs/logs as needed.
- Resolve only blocking gaps.
- Launch smallest valid step first when uncertainty is high.
- Record commands, node assignments, log paths, run IDs.
- If the launched action is long-running, immediately enter watch mode instead of treating launch as completion.
- After each poll, continue with monitoring, diagnosis, recovery, or result collection; do not default to "job started, come back later."
- Replan on major failures.
Watch Mode Policy
Long-running experiment execution is an active responsibility, not a fire-and-forget step.
After launching a long-running job:
- stay in watch mode by default
- poll logs, checkpoints, scheduler state, or metrics on a model-chosen cadence
- after each poll:
- if
running, choose the next sleep interval and continue watching - if
completed, inspect outputs and continue validation/analysis - if
stalled, inspect evidence, retrieve memory, and attempt recovery or replan - if
failed, diagnose immediately and attempt the smallest safe recovery
- if
- ask the user only for hard blockers, major safety/resource approvals, or true decision points
- only allow explicit fire-and-forget behavior when the user clearly requested it
Watch-Loop Execution Template
Use this template after each experiment poll:
- read
status,followup_action,progress_changed, andlast_log_tail - branch immediately:
continue-watchorwait-and-poll- choose the next sleep interval
- keep monitoring
collect-results- inspect outputs, metrics, checkpoints, and artifacts
- continue validation and analysis
diagnose-stall- inspect logs
- retrieve
procedureandepisode - attempt the smallest safe recovery
diagnose-failure- inspect failure evidence
- retrieve memory
- attempt recovery or replan
replan- update route and continue execution
- write working state update before the next wait or recovery attempt
- do not stop at "job is still running" unless fire-and-forget was explicitly requested
Short Iterative Evaluation Loop
Short local edit-and-evaluate cycles must be handled as an owned execution loop, not as a one-shot task.
When the task is iterative optimization:
- compile an evaluation ladder:
- baseline or previous-best reference
- primary regression set
- promotion gate for larger evaluation
- final target evaluation
- prefer broader representative sets over a few hand-picked cases
- after each batch:
- run the current gate set
- compare score against baseline and best-so-far
- inspect regressions, not just aggregate score
- decide
iterate,replan, orpromote-to-next-gate
- if the new result is the best-so-far and the user requested preservation, snapshot the relevant prompt/config/code/results before the next risky change
- if the current gate is unmet, do not stop merely because one iteration completed cleanly
- only hand back to the user when:
- compiled targets are met
- a true hard blocker remains
- a safety/resource gate requires approval
Unknown Error Branch
When execution fails with unknown error:
- local evidence triage (stack, logs, env, recent diffs)
- retrieve relevant
procedureandepisodememory - targeted search
- deep research (debug-investigation) if unresolved
- apply smallest fix and validate
Retry behavior should be mode-aware and evidence-driven.
SSH and Remote Policy
- Choose control mode: direct SSH, SSH+session manager, scheduler, or existing remote agent.
- Declare remote model: remote-native or local-driver.
- Use remote profile reuse decision from
run-governor; if missing, request exactly one confirmation viahuman-checkpoint. - Validate connectivity and runtime basics before expensive launch when uncertainty exists.
Logging and Failure Handling
Record stable paths for:
- stdout/stderr
- checkpoints
- metrics
- artifacts
On failures, record owner and cleanup plan. On stalled jobs, record recovery attempt and next watch step.
Data Analysis Visualization Policy
When the deliverable includes data analysis results:
- run visualization analysis on the computed metrics/tables before final delivery
- save report-facing figures under
<codex-cwd>/logs/runs/<run_id>/reports/figures/ - keep runtime-generated source figures under
<runtime_project_root>/runs/<run_id>/artifacts/figures/ - include figure paths in stage reports and final summary
- prefer stable filenames such as
<topic>-<metric>.pngor<topic>-<metric>.svg
Stop Conditions
Do not launch full run when required inputs are still unknown and not explicitly waived.
In full-auto, continue only if risk is acceptable and no major safety issue exists.
In full-auto, if remote profile is complete, reuse it by default unless explicitly overridden.
For iterative optimization tasks, do not stop after a single batch while the active evaluation gate or non-regression guard is still unmet.
Output Contract
Emit execution state as:
run_id: <id>
mode: <full-auto|moderate|detailed>
execution_mode: <local|ssh|ssh+tmux|scheduler|remote-agent>
remote_model: <remote-native|local-driver|n/a>
local_project_root: <path>
runtime_project_root: <path>
output_path: <runtime_project_root>/runs/<run_id>
environment:
python: <path/version>
env: <conda/venv/module>
proxy_needed: <yes|no|unknown>
tracking:
mode: <wandb|files|mixed|unknown>
run_id: <id|pending>
node_plan:
master: <host|n/a>
workers: <list|pending>
logs:
stdout: <path>
artifacts: <path>
analysis_artifacts:
figures_report_root: <codex-cwd>/logs/runs/<run_id>/reports/figures
figures_runtime_root: <runtime_project_root>/runs/<run_id>/artifacts/figures
figures: <list of saved figure paths>
next_action: <smallest safe step>
checkpoint_needed: <yes|no>
goal_status:
primary_target: <target>
active_gate: <current threshold or eval set>
best_so_far: <metric summary>
done_allowed: <yes|no>Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

