rust-call-graph
Skill2 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Visualize Rust function call graphs using LSP. Triggers on: /call-graph, call hierarchy, who calls, what calls, 调用图, 调用关系, 谁调用了, 调用了谁
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- moeru-ai/auvword for word, first seen Oct 10, 2026
- fjrevoredo/mini-diariumword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- ZhangHanDong/rust-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- MovGP0/Skillsword for word, first seen Jun 30, 2026
- pocket-veto/pocket-vetoword for word, first seen Jun 27, 2026
- actionbook/rust-skillsword for word, first seen Jan 20, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 6
- ZhangHanDong/rust-skills★ 1.5k100% same
- actionbook/rust-skills★ 1.5k100% same
- fjrevoredo/mini-diarium★ 318100% same
- moeru-ai/auv★ 207100% same
- MovGP0/Skills★ 1100% same
- pocket-veto/pocket-veto★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository192 other files it gives its agents.
- clickhouse-architecture-advisor/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- clickhouse-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- unsafe-checker/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- alertmanager-querySkill
- analyzing-range-distributionSkill
- analyzing-schema-change-storage-riskSkill
- argocdSkill
- aspire-configurationSkill
- aspire-integration-testingSkill
- aspire-service-defaultsSkill
- auditing-cloud-cluster-securitySkill
- auditing-table-statisticsSkill
- benchmarking-transaction-patternsSkill
- cepthSkill
- chdb-datastoreSkill
- chdb-sqlSkill
- clickhouse-architecture-advisorSkill
- clickhouse-best-practicesSkill
- clickhousectl-cloud-deploySkill
- clickhousectl-local-devSkill
- cockroachdb-sqlSkill
- coding-guidelinesSkill
- configuring-audit-loggingSkill
- configuring-ip-allowlistsSkill
- configuring-log-exportSkill
- configuring-private-connectivitySkill
- configuring-sso-and-scimSkill
- create-technical-architecture-documentSkill
- csharp-mstestSkill
- csharp-tunitSkill
- csharp-xunitSkill
- designing-application-transactionsSkill
- designing-multi-region-applicationsSkill
- domain-cliSkill
- domain-cloud-nativeSkill
- domain-embeddedSkill
- domain-fintechSkill
- domain-iotSkill
- domain-mlSkill
- domain-webSkill
- dotnet-aot-wasmSkill
- dotnet-aspire-patternsSkill
- dotnet-benchmarkdotnetSkill
- dotnet-blazor-authSkill
- dotnet-blazor-componentsSkill
- dotnet-blazor-patternsSkill
- dotnet-blazor-testingSkill
- dotnet-channelsSkill
- dotnet-ci-benchmarkingSkill
- dotnet-cli-architectureSkill
- dotnet-cli-distributionSkill
- dotnet-cli-packagingSkill
- dotnet-cli-release-pipelineSkill
- dotnet-containersSkill
- dotnet-cryptographySkill
- dotnet-csharp-dependency-injectionSkill
- dotnet-csharp-modern-patternsSkill
- dotnet-csharp-nullable-reference-typesSkill
- dotnet-csharp-source-generatorsSkill
- dotnet-maui-doctorSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 154
After generating the call graph, provide insights:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Rust Call Graph
Visualize function call relationships using LSP call hierarchy.
Usage
/rust-call-graph <function_name> [--depth N] [--direction in|out|both]Options:
--depth N: How many levels to traverse (default: 3)--direction:in(callers),out(callees),both
Examples:
/rust-call-graph process_request- Show both callers and callees/rust-call-graph handle_error --direction in- Show only callers/rust-call-graph main --direction out --depth 5- Deep callee analysis
LSP Operations
1. Prepare Call Hierarchy
Get the call hierarchy item for a function.
LSP(
operation: "prepareCallHierarchy",
filePath: "src/handler.rs",
line: 45,
character: 8
)2. Incoming Calls (Who calls this?)
LSP(
operation: "incomingCalls",
filePath: "src/handler.rs",
line: 45,
character: 8
)3. Outgoing Calls (What does this call?)
LSP(
operation: "outgoingCalls",
filePath: "src/handler.rs",
line: 45,
character: 8
)Workflow
User: "Show call graph for process_request"
│
▼
[1] Find function location
LSP(workspaceSymbol) or Grep
│
▼
[2] Prepare call hierarchy
LSP(prepareCallHierarchy)
│
▼
[3] Get incoming calls (callers)
LSP(incomingCalls)
│
▼
[4] Get outgoing calls (callees)
LSP(outgoingCalls)
│
▼
[5] Recursively expand to depth N
│
▼
[6] Generate ASCII visualizationOutput Format
Incoming Calls (Who calls this?)
## Callers of `process_request`
main
└── run_server
└── handle_connection
└── process_request ◄── YOU ARE HEREOutgoing Calls (What does this call?)
## Callees of `process_request`
process_request ◄── YOU ARE HERE
├── parse_headers
│ └── validate_header
├── authenticate
│ ├── check_token
│ └── load_user
├── execute_handler
│ └── [dynamic dispatch]
└── send_response
└── serialize_bodyBidirectional (Both)
## Call Graph for `process_request`
┌─────────────────┐
│ main │
└────────┬────────┘
│
┌────────▼────────┐
│ run_server │
└────────┬────────┘
│
┌────────▼────────┐
│handle_connection│
└────────┬────────┘
│
┌────────────────────┼────────────────────┐
│ │ │
┌───────▼───────┐ ┌───────▼───────┐ ┌───────▼───────┐
│ parse_headers │ │ authenticate │ │send_response │
└───────────────┘ └───────┬───────┘ └───────────────┘
│
┌───────┴───────┐
│ │
┌──────▼──────┐ ┌──────▼──────┐
│ check_token │ │ load_user │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘Analysis Insights
After generating the call graph, provide insights:
## Analysis
**Entry Points:** main, test_process_request
**Leaf Functions:** validate_header, serialize_body
**Hot Path:** main → run_server → handle_connection → process_request
**Complexity:** 12 functions, 3 levels deep
**Potential Issues:**
- `authenticate` has high fan-out (4 callees)
- `process_request` is called from 3 places (consider if this is intentional)Common Patterns
| User Says | Direction | Use Case |
| "Who calls X?" | incoming | Impact analysis |
| "What does X call?" | outgoing | Understanding implementation |
| "Show call graph" | both | Full picture |
| "Trace from main to X" | outgoing | Execution path |
Visualization Options
| Style | Best For |
| Tree (default) | Simple hierarchies |
| Box diagram | Complex relationships |
| Flat list | Many connections |
| Mermaid | Export to docs |
Mermaid Export
graph TD
main --> run_server
run_server --> handle_connection
handle_connection --> process_request
process_request --> parse_headers
process_request --> authenticate
process_request --> send_responseRelated Skills
| When | See |
| Find definition | rust-code-navigator |
| Project structure | rust-symbol-analyzer |
| Trait implementations | rust-trait-explorer |
| Safe refactoring | rust-refactor-helper |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

