golang-troubleshooting
Skill2 starsChanged 29 days agoMITView on GitHub
Troubleshoot Golang programs systematically - find and fix the root cause. Use when encountering bugs, crashes, deadlocks, or unexpected behavior in Go code. Covers debugging methodology, common Go pitfalls, test-driven debugging, pprof setup and capture, Delve debugger, race detection, GODEBUG tracing, and production debugging. Start here for any 'something is wrong' situation. Not for interpreting profiles or benchmarking (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark` skill) or applying optimization patterns (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performance` skill).
15 other projects use a version of this, 12 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- aiproxer/aiproxertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- samber/cc-skills-golangedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- poizoncoded/skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- klawisha012/agentsyncedited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- Fahrnetic/engineering-agent-skill-workflowedited, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- rockcookies/skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use golang-gopls and golang-refactoring.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
jkeddariSkillgolang-gopls
Golang semantic code intelligence with the official gopls language server: definitions, references, symbols, call and implementation hierarchies, diagnostics, formatting, code actions, safe rename, extract, inline, and package API discovery. Use when navigating or refactoring a local Go workspace or when semantic analysis is safer than text search.
Also in 5 projects that use this
jkeddariSkillgolang-refactoring
Golang refactoring workflow for safe structural change: blast-radius discovery, coverage-adaptive safety nets, semantic rename and extract operations, package moves, import-cycle removal, staged commits, and behavior-preserving verification. Use when restructuring existing Go code without intentionally changing its public behavior.
Also in 5 projects that use this
Other versions15 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- alexastrum/skl★ 11100% same
Edited · 12
- samber/cc-skills-golang★ 3.8k88% same
- klawisha012/agentsync★ 1894% same
- tstapler/dotfiles★ 888% same
- tquangkhai98/browser-profiles-manager★ 598% same
- Fahrnetic/engineering-agent-skill-workflow★ 297% same
- poizoncoded/skills★ 298% same
- jkeddari/go-skills★ 114% same
- rockcookies/skills★ 190% same
- VerifiedOrganic/onboard★ 199% same
- gccli/skills★ 098% same
2 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 2
- aiproxer/aiproxer★ 22same name
- reagin/agent-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository192 other files it gives its agents.
- clickhouse-architecture-advisor/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- clickhouse-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- unsafe-checker/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- alertmanager-querySkill
- analyzing-range-distributionSkill
- analyzing-schema-change-storage-riskSkill
- argocdSkill
- aspire-configurationSkill
- aspire-integration-testingSkill
- aspire-service-defaultsSkill
- auditing-cloud-cluster-securitySkill
- auditing-table-statisticsSkill
- benchmarking-transaction-patternsSkill
- cepthSkill
- chdb-datastoreSkill
- chdb-sqlSkill
- clickhouse-architecture-advisorSkill
- clickhouse-best-practicesSkill
- clickhousectl-cloud-deploySkill
- clickhousectl-local-devSkill
- cockroachdb-sqlSkill
- coding-guidelinesSkill
- configuring-audit-loggingSkill
- configuring-ip-allowlistsSkill
- configuring-log-exportSkill
- configuring-private-connectivitySkill
- configuring-sso-and-scimSkill
- create-technical-architecture-documentSkill
- csharp-mstestSkill
- csharp-tunitSkill
- csharp-xunitSkill
- designing-application-transactionsSkill
- designing-multi-region-applicationsSkill
- domain-cliSkill
- domain-cloud-nativeSkill
- domain-embeddedSkill
- domain-fintechSkill
- domain-iotSkill
- domain-mlSkill
- domain-webSkill
- dotnet-aot-wasmSkill
- dotnet-aspire-patternsSkill
- dotnet-benchmarkdotnetSkill
- dotnet-blazor-authSkill
- dotnet-blazor-componentsSkill
- dotnet-blazor-patternsSkill
- dotnet-blazor-testingSkill
- dotnet-channelsSkill
- dotnet-ci-benchmarkingSkill
- dotnet-cli-architectureSkill
- dotnet-cli-distributionSkill
- dotnet-cli-packagingSkill
- dotnet-cli-release-pipelineSkill
- dotnet-containersSkill
- dotnet-cryptographySkill
- dotnet-csharp-dependency-injectionSkill
- dotnet-csharp-modern-patternsSkill
- dotnet-csharp-nullable-reference-typesSkill
- dotnet-csharp-source-generatorsSkill
- dotnet-maui-doctorSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 10 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
10
Common
Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 26
Thinking mode: Use ultrathink for debugging and root cause analysis.
- Common: line 37
When the user reports a bug, crash, performance problem, or unexpected behavior in Go code:
- Very specific: line 43
Escalate tools incrementally: Start with the simplest diagnostic (fmt.Println, test isolation) and only reach for pprof, Delve, or GODEBUG …
- Common: line 44
Never propose a fix you cannot explain: If you do not understand why the bug happens, say so and investigate further.
- Common: line 88
Remember: Read the Error → Reproduce → Measure One Thing → Fix → Verify
- Common: line 105
NEVER debug by guessing — reproduce first.
- Common: line 107
Write a failing test that captures the bug
- Common: line 110
Use git bisect to find the breaking commit
- Common: line 114
Never rely on intuition for performance or concurrency bugs:
- Common: line 128
When you don't understand the issue:
- Common: line 132
Ask "why" five times: Keep going until you reach the actual root cause.
- Common: line 151
If any of these are happening, stop and return to Step 1:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Persona: You are a Go systems debugger. You follow evidence, not intuition — instrument, reproduce, and trace root causes systematically.
Thinking mode: Use ultrathink for debugging and root cause analysis. Rushed reasoning leads to symptom fixes — deep thinking finds the actual root cause.
Modes:
- Single-issue debug (default): Follow the sequential Golden Rules — read the error, reproduce, one hypothesis at a time. Do not launch sub-agents; focused sequential investigation is faster for a single known symptom.
- Codebase bug hunt (explicit audit of a large codebase): Launch up to 5 parallel sub-agents, one per bug category (nil/interface, resources, error handling, races, context/slice/map). Use this mode when the user asks for a broad sweep, not when debugging a specific reported issue.
Go Troubleshooting Guide
NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST. Symptom fixes create new bugs and waste time. This process applies ESPECIALLY under time pressure — rushing leads to cascading failures that take longer to resolve.
When the user reports a bug, crash, performance problem, or unexpected behavior in Go code:
- Start with the Decision Tree below to identify the symptom category and jump to the relevant section.
- Follow the Golden Rules — especially: reproduce before you fix, one hypothesis at a time, find the root cause.
- Work through the General Debugging Methodology step by step. Do not skip steps.
- Watch for Red Flags in your own reasoning. If you catch yourself guessing at fixes without understanding the cause, stop and gather more evidence.
- Escalate tools incrementally. Start with the simplest diagnostic (
fmt.Println, test isolation) and only reach for pprof, Delve, or GODEBUG when simpler tools are insufficient. - Never propose a fix you cannot explain. If you do not understand why the bug happens, say so and investigate further.
Quick Decision Tree
WHAT ARE YOU SEEING?
"Build won't compile"
→ go build ./... 2>&1, go vet ./...
→ See [compilation.md](./references/compilation.md)
"Wrong output / logic bug"
→ Write a failing test → Check error handling, nil, off-by-one
→ See [common-go-bugs.md](./references/common-go-bugs.md), [testing-debug.md](./references/testing-debug.md)
"Random crashes / panics"
→ GOTRACEBACK=all ./app → go test -race ./...
→ See [common-go-bugs.md](./references/common-go-bugs.md), [diagnostic-tools.md](./references/diagnostic-tools.md)
"Sometimes works, sometimes fails"
→ go test -race ./...
→ See [concurrency-debug.md](./references/concurrency-debug.md), [testing-debug.md](./references/testing-debug.md)
"Program hangs / frozen"
→ curl localhost:6060/debug/pprof/goroutine?debug=2
→ See [concurrency-debug.md](./references/concurrency-debug.md), [pprof.md](./references/pprof.md)
"High CPU usage"
→ pprof CPU profiling
→ See [performance-debug.md](./references/performance-debug.md), [pprof.md](./references/pprof.md)
"Memory growing over time"
→ pprof heap profiling
→ See [performance-debug.md](./references/performance-debug.md), [concurrency-debug.md](./references/concurrency-debug.md)
"Slow / high latency / p99 spikes"
→ CPU + mutex + block profiles
→ See [performance-debug.md](./references/performance-debug.md), [diagnostic-tools.md](./references/diagnostic-tools.md)
"Simple bug, easy to reproduce"
→ Write a test, add fmt.Println / log.Debug
→ See [testing-debug.md](./references/testing-debug.md)Remember: Read the Error → Reproduce → Measure One Thing → Fix → Verify
Most Go bugs are: missing error checks, nil pointers, forgotten context cancel, unclosed resources, race conditions, or silent error swallowing.
The Golden Rules
1. Read the Error Message First
Go error messages are precise. Read them fully before doing anything else:
- File and line number → go directly there
- Type mismatch → check function signatures, interface satisfaction
- "undefined" → check imports, exported names, build tags
- "cannot use X as Y" → check concrete types vs interfaces
2. Reproduce Before You Fix
NEVER debug by guessing — reproduce first. Always:
- Write a failing test that captures the bug
- Make it deterministic
- Isolate the minimal failing example
- Use
git bisectto find the breaking commit
3. If You Don't Measure It, You're Guessing
Never rely on intuition for performance or concurrency bugs:
- pprof over intuition
- race detector over reasoning
- benchmarks over assumptions
4. One Hypothesis at a Time
Change one thing, measure, confirm. If you change three things at once, you learn nothing.
5. Find the Root Cause — No Workarounds
A band-aid fix that masks the symptom IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. You MUST understand why the bug happens before writing a fix.
When you don't understand the issue:
- Trace the data flow backwards from the symptom to its origin.
- Question your assumptions. The code you trust might be wrong.
- Ask "why" five times. Keep going until you reach the actual root cause.
- Perform more troubleshooting checks. More fmt.Println, more output inspection...
6. Research the Codebase, Not Just the Diff
Before flagging a bug or proposing a fix, trace the data flow and check for upstream handling. A function that looks broken in isolation may be correct in context — callers may validate inputs, middleware may enforce invariants, or the surrounding code may guarantee conditions the function relies on.
- Trace callers — who calls this function and with what values? Call sites can be found with code search tools.
- Check upstream validation — input parsing, type conversions, or guard clauses earlier in the chain may make the "bug" unreachable.
- Read the surrounding code — middleware, interceptors, or init functions may set up state the function depends on.
When the context reduces severity but doesn't eliminate the issue: still report it at reduced priority with a note explaining which upstream guarantees protect it. Add a brief inline comment (e.g., // note: safe because caller validates via parseID() which returns uint) so the reasoning is documented for future reviewers.
7. Start Simple
Sometimes fmt.Println IS the right tool for local debugging. Escalate tools only when simpler approaches fail. NEVER use fmt.Println for production debugging — use slog.
Red Flags: You're Debugging Wrong
If any of these are happening, stop and return to Step 1:
- "Quick fix for now, investigate later" — There is no "later". Find the root cause.
- Multiple simultaneous changes — One hypothesis at a time.
- Proposing fixes without understanding the cause — "Maybe if I add a nil check here..." is guessing, not debugging.
- Each fix reveals a new problem — You're treating symptoms. The real bug is elsewhere.
- 3+ fix attempts on the same issue — You have the wrong mental model. Re-read the code, trace the data flow from scratch.
- "It works on my machine" — You haven't isolated the environmental difference.
- Blaming the framework/stdlib/compiler — It's almost never a Go bug. Verify your code first.
Reference Files
- General Debugging Methodology — The systematic 10-step process: define symptoms, isolate reproduction, form one hypothesis, test it, verify the root cause, and defend against regressions. Escalation guide: when to escalate from
fmt.Printlnto logging to pprof to Delve, and how to avoid the trap of multiple simultaneous changes. - Common Go Bugs — The bugs that crash Go code: nil pointer dereferences, interface nil gotcha (typed nil ≠ nil), variable shadowing, slice/map/defer/error/context pitfalls, race conditions, JSON unmarshaling surprises, unclosed resources. Each with reproduction patterns and fixes.
- Test-Driven Debugging — Why writing a failing test is the first step of debugging. Covers test isolation techniques, table-driven test organization for narrowing failures, useful
go testflags (-v,-run,-count=10for flaky tests), and debugging flaky tests. - Concurrency Debugging — Race conditions, deadlocks, goroutine leaks. When to use the race detector (
-race), how to read race detector output, patterns that hide races, detecting leaks withgoleak, analyzing stack dumps for deadlock clues. - Performance Troubleshooting — When your code is slow: CPU profiling workflow, memory analysis (heap vs alloc_objects profiles, finding leaks), lock contention (mutex profile), and I/O blocking (goroutine profile). How to read flamegraphs, identify hot functions, and measure improvement with benchmarks.
- pprof Reference — Complete pprof manual. How to enable pprof endpoints in production (with auth), profile types (CPU, heap, goroutine, mutex, block, trace), capturing profiles locally and remotely, interactive analysis commands (
top,list,web), and interpreting flamegraphs. - Diagnostic Tools — Auxiliary tools for specific symptoms. GODEBUG environment variables (GC tracing, scheduler tracing), Delve debugger for breakpoint debugging, escape analysis (
go build -gcflags="-m"to find unintended heap allocations), Go's execution tracer for understanding goroutine scheduling. - Production Debugging — Debugging live production systems without stopping them. Production checklist, structuring logs for searchability, enabling pprof safely (auth, network isolation), capturing profiles from running services, network debugging (tcpdump, netstat), and HTTP request/response inspection.
- Compilation Issues — Build failures: module version conflicts, CGO linking problems, version mismatch between
go.modand installed Go version, platform-specific build tags preventing cross-compilation. - Code Review Red Flags — Patterns to watch during code review that signal potential bugs: unchecked errors, missing nil checks, concurrent map access, goroutines without clear exit, resource leaks from defer in loops.
Cross-References
- → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performanceskill for optimization patterns after identifying bottlenecks - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observabilityskill for metrics, alerting, and Grafana dashboards for Go runtime monitoring - → See
samber/cc-skills@promql-cliskill for querying Prometheus metrics during production incident investigation - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency,samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-safety,samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handlingskills
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

