gdpr-compliant
Skill2 starsChanged 29 days agoMITView on GitHub
Apply GDPR-compliant engineering practices across your codebase. Use this skill whenever you are designing APIs, writing data models, building authentication flows, implementing logging, handling user data, writing retention/deletion jobs, designing cloud infrastructure, or reviewing pull requests for privacy compliance. Trigger this skill for any task involving personal data, user accounts, cookies, analytics, emails, audit logs, encryption, pseudonymization, anonymization, data exports, breach response, CI/CD pipelines that process real data, or any question framed as "is this GDPR-compliant?". Inspired by CNIL developer guidance and GDPR Articles 5, 25, 32, 33, 35.
- Reads credentials
6 other projects use a version of this, 4 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- MarieLynneBlock/arcanum-artifexedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- github/awesome-copilotword for word, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- XGENT-ai/skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- ReaperOAK/ForgeOSword for word, first seen Jun 8, 2026
- Cogni-AI-OU/cogni-ai-agent-skillsedited, first seen May 19, 2026
- iCesofT/awesome-aiedited, first seen Apr 16, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41k100% same
- ReaperOAK/ForgeOS★ 0100% same
Edited · 4
- Cogni-AI-OU/cogni-ai-agent-skills★ 486% same
- MarieLynneBlock/arcanum-artifex★ 498% same
- iCesofT/awesome-ai★ 194% same
- XGENT-ai/skills★ 197% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository192 other files it gives its agents.
- clickhouse-architecture-advisor/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- clickhouse-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- unsafe-checker/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- alertmanager-querySkill
- analyzing-range-distributionSkill
- analyzing-schema-change-storage-riskSkill
- argocdSkill
- aspire-configurationSkill
- aspire-integration-testingSkill
- aspire-service-defaultsSkill
- auditing-cloud-cluster-securitySkill
- auditing-table-statisticsSkill
- benchmarking-transaction-patternsSkill
- cepthSkill
- chdb-datastoreSkill
- chdb-sqlSkill
- clickhouse-architecture-advisorSkill
- clickhouse-best-practicesSkill
- clickhousectl-cloud-deploySkill
- clickhousectl-local-devSkill
- cockroachdb-sqlSkill
- coding-guidelinesSkill
- configuring-audit-loggingSkill
- configuring-ip-allowlistsSkill
- configuring-log-exportSkill
- configuring-private-connectivitySkill
- configuring-sso-and-scimSkill
- create-technical-architecture-documentSkill
- csharp-mstestSkill
- csharp-tunitSkill
- csharp-xunitSkill
- designing-application-transactionsSkill
- designing-multi-region-applicationsSkill
- domain-cliSkill
- domain-cloud-nativeSkill
- domain-embeddedSkill
- domain-fintechSkill
- domain-iotSkill
- domain-mlSkill
- domain-webSkill
- dotnet-aot-wasmSkill
- dotnet-aspire-patternsSkill
- dotnet-benchmarkdotnetSkill
- dotnet-blazor-authSkill
- dotnet-blazor-componentsSkill
- dotnet-blazor-patternsSkill
- dotnet-blazor-testingSkill
- dotnet-channelsSkill
- dotnet-ci-benchmarkingSkill
- dotnet-cli-architectureSkill
- dotnet-cli-distributionSkill
- dotnet-cli-packagingSkill
- dotnet-cli-release-pipelineSkill
- dotnet-containersSkill
- dotnet-cryptographySkill
- dotnet-csharp-dependency-injectionSkill
- dotnet-csharp-modern-patternsSkill
- dotnet-csharp-nullable-reference-typesSkill
- dotnet-csharp-source-generatorsSkill
- dotnet-maui-doctorSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
34 rules. 26 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
26
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Very specific: line 37
Add CreatedAt, RetentionExpiresAt to every table holding personal data at creation time.
- Common: line 38
Default all optional data collection to off.
- Common: line 40
Update the RoPA with every new feature that introduces a processing activity.
- Common: line 54
Use separate DTOs for create, read, and update — never reuse the same object.
- Common: line 69
Document the purpose of every processing activity in code comments and in the RoPA.
- Common: line 74
Use support ticket content to train ML models without a separate legal basis and user notice.
- Common: line 81
Every table holding personal data MUST have a defined retention period.
- Very specific: line 97
Add RetentionExpiresAt column — compute at insert time.
- Very specific: line 98
Use soft-delete (DeletedAt) with a scheduled hard-delete after the erasure request window (30 days).
- Common: line 108
MUST NOT include personal data in URL paths or query parameters.
- Common: line 113
Use UUIDs or opaque identifiers — never sequential integers as public resource IDs.
- Very specific: line 121
Use Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * on authenticated APIs.
- Common: line 130
MUST NOT log: passwords, tokens, session IDs, credentials, card numbers, national IDs, health data.
- Common: line 131
MUST NOT log full request/response bodies where PII may be present.
- Very specific: line 136
Use structured logging (JSON) with userId as an internal identifier, not the email address.
- Common: line 147
Use Problem Details (RFC 7807) for all error responses.
- Common: line 172
Use Argon2id (recommended) or bcrypt (cost ≥ 12).
- Common: line 173
Use a unique salt per password.
- Very specific: line 184
Use pre-commit hooks (gitleaks, detect-secrets) to prevent secret commits.
- Common: line 190
Commit secrets to source code.
- Common: line 198
When erasing a user, anonymize records that must be retained (financial, audit) rather than deleting them.
- Common: line 201
MUST NOT: call data "anonymized" if re-identification is possible through linkage attacks.
- Common: line 208
MUST NOT use production personal data in dev, staging, or CI environments.
- Common: line 209
MUST NOT restore production DB backups to non-production without scrubbing PII first.
- Very specific: line 210
Use synthetic data generators: Bogus (.NET), Faker (JS/Python/Ruby).
- Very specific: line 211
Use @example.com for all test email addresses.
- Common: line 237
Every new PII column has a documented purpose and retention period.
- Common: line 239
No sequential integer PKs as public-facing identifiers.
- Common: line 242
No PII in URL paths or query parameters.
- Common: line 243
All endpoints returning personal data are authenticated.
- Common: line 248
No passwords, tokens, or credentials logged.
- Common: line 250
No full request/response bodies logged where PII may be present.
- Common: line 253
No public storage buckets or public-IP databases.
- Common: line 259
No secrets in source code or committed config files.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
GDPR Engineering Skill
Actionable GDPR reference for engineers, architects, DevOps, and tech leads. Inspired by CNIL developer guidance and GDPR Articles 5, 25, 32, 33, 35.
Golden Rule: Collect less. Store less. Expose less. Retain less.
For deep dives, read the reference files in references/:
references/data-rights.md— user rights endpoints, DSR workflow, RoPAreferences/security.md— encryption, hashing, secrets, anonymizationreferences/operations.md— cloud, CI/CD, incident response, architecture patterns
1. Core GDPR Principles (Article 5)
| Principle | Engineering obligation |
| Lawfulness, fairness, transparency | Document legal basis for every processing activity in the RoPA |
| Purpose limitation | Data collected for purpose A MUST NOT be reused for purpose B without a new legal basis |
| Data minimization | Collect only fields with a documented business need today |
| Accuracy | Provide update endpoints; propagate corrections to downstream stores |
| Storage limitation | Define TTL at schema design time — never after |
| Integrity & confidentiality | Encrypt at rest and in transit; restrict and audit access |
| Accountability | Maintain evidence of compliance; RoPA ready for DPA inspection at any time |
2. Privacy by Design & by Default
MUST
- Add
CreatedAt,RetentionExpiresAtto every table holding personal data at creation time. - Default all optional data collection to off. Users opt in; they never opt out of a default-on setting.
- Conduct a DPIA before building high-risk processing (biometrics, health data, large-scale profiling, systematic monitoring).
- Update the RoPA with every new feature that introduces a processing activity.
- Sign a DPA with every sub-processor before data flows to them.
MUST NOT
- Ship a new data collection feature without a documented legal basis.
- Enable analytics, tracking, or telemetry by default without explicit consent.
- Store personal data in a system not listed in the RoPA.
3. Data Minimization
MUST
- Map every DTO/model field to a concrete business need. Remove undocumented fields.
- Use separate DTOs for create, read, and update — never reuse the same object.
- Return only what the caller is authorized to see — use response projections.
- Mask sensitive values at the edge: return
****1234for card numbers, never the full value. - Exclude sensitive fields (DOB, national ID, health) from default list/search projections.
MUST NOT
- Log full request/response bodies if they may contain personal data.
- Include personal data in URL path segments or query parameters (CDN logs, browser history).
- Collect
dateOfBirth, national ID, or health data without an explicit legal basis.
4. Purpose Limitation
MUST
- Document the purpose of every processing activity in code comments and in the RoPA.
- Obtain a new legal basis or perform a compatibility analysis before reusing data for a secondary purpose.
MUST NOT
- Share personal data collected for service delivery with advertising networks without explicit consent.
- Use support ticket content to train ML models without a separate legal basis and user notice.
5. Storage Limitation & Retention
MUST
- Every table holding personal data MUST have a defined retention period.
- Enforce retention automatically via a scheduled job (Hangfire, cron) — never a manual process.
- Anonymize or delete data when retention expires — never leave expired data silently in production.
Recommended defaults
| Data type | Max retention |
| Auth / audit logs | 12–24 months |
| Session / refresh tokens | 30–90 days |
| Email / notification logs | 6 months |
| Inactive user accounts | 12 months after last login → notify → delete |
| Payment records | As required by tax law (7–10 years), minimized |
| Analytics events | 13 months |
SHOULD
- Add
RetentionExpiresAtcolumn — compute at insert time. - Use soft-delete (
DeletedAt) with a scheduled hard-delete after the erasure request window (30 days).
MUST NOT
- Retain personal data indefinitely "in case it becomes useful later."
6. API Design Rules
MUST
- MUST NOT include personal data in URL paths or query parameters.
GET /users/{userId}
- Authenticate all endpoints that return or accept personal data.
- Extract the acting user's identity from the JWT — never from the request body.
- Validate ownership on every resource:
if (resource.OwnerId != currentUserId) return 403. - Use UUIDs or opaque identifiers — never sequential integers as public resource IDs.
SHOULD
- Rate-limit sensitive endpoints (login, data export, password reset).
- Set
Referrer-Policy: no-referrerand an explicitCORSallowlist.
MUST NOT
- Return stack traces, internal paths, or database errors in API responses.
- Use
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *on authenticated APIs.
7. Logging Rules
MUST
- Anonymize IPs in application logs — mask last octet (IPv4) or last 80 bits (IPv6).
192.168.1.xxx
- MUST NOT log: passwords, tokens, session IDs, credentials, card numbers, national IDs, health data.
- MUST NOT log full request/response bodies where PII may be present.
- Enforce log retention — purge automatically after the defined period.
SHOULD
- Log events not data:
"User {UserId} updated email"not"Email changed from a@b.com to c@d.com". - Use structured logging (JSON) with
userIdas an internal identifier, not the email address. - Separate audit logs (sensitive access, admin actions) from application logs — different retention and ACLs.
8. Error Handling
MUST
- Return generic error messages — never expose stack traces, internal paths, or DB errors.
"Column 'email' violates unique constraint on table 'users'""A user with this email address already exists."
- Use Problem Details (RFC 7807) for all error responses.
- Log the full error server-side with a correlation ID; return only the correlation ID to the client.
MUST NOT
- Include file paths, class names, or line numbers in error responses.
- Include personal data in error messages (e.g., "User john@example.com not found").
9. Encryption (summary — see references/security.md for full detail)
| Scope | Minimum standard |
| Standard personal data | AES-256 disk/volume encryption |
| Sensitive data (health, financial, biometric) | AES-256 column-level + envelope encryption via KMS |
| In transit | TLS 1.2+ (prefer 1.3); HSTS enforced |
| Keys | HSM-backed KMS; rotate DEKs annually |
MUST NOT allow TLS 1.0/1.1, null cipher suites, or hardcoded encryption keys.
10. Password Hashing
MUST
- Use Argon2id (recommended) or bcrypt (cost ≥ 12). Never MD5, SHA-1, or SHA-256.
- Use a unique salt per password. Store only the hash.
MUST NOT
- Log passwords in any form. Transmit passwords in URLs. Store reset tokens in plaintext.
11. Secrets Management
MUST
- Store all secrets in a KMS: Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, GCP Secret Manager, or HashiCorp Vault.
- Use pre-commit hooks (
gitleaks,detect-secrets) to prevent secret commits. - Rotate secrets on developer offboarding, annual schedule, or suspected compromise.
.gitignore MUST include: .env, .env.*, *.pem, *.key, *.pfx, *.p12, secrets/
MUST NOT
- Commit secrets to source code. Store secrets as plain-text environment variable defaults.
12. Anonymization & Pseudonymization (summary — see references/security.md)
- Anonymization = irreversible → falls outside GDPR scope. Use for retained records after erasure.
- Pseudonymization = reversible with a key → still personal data, reduced risk.
- When erasing a user, anonymize records that must be retained (financial, audit) rather than deleting them.
- Store the pseudonymization key in the KMS — never in the same database as the pseudonymized data.
MUST NOT call data "anonymized" if re-identification is possible through linkage attacks.
13. Testing with Fake Data
MUST
- MUST NOT use production personal data in dev, staging, or CI environments.
- MUST NOT restore production DB backups to non-production without scrubbing PII first.
- Use synthetic data generators:
Bogus(.NET),Faker(JS/Python/Ruby). - Use
@example.comfor all test email addresses.
14. Anti-Patterns
| Anti-pattern | Correct approach |
| PII in URLs | Opaque UUIDs as public identifiers |
| Logging full request bodies | Log structured event metadata only |
| "Keep forever" schema | TTL defined at design time |
| Production data in dev/test | Synthetic data + scrubbing pipeline |
| Shared credentials across teams | Individual accounts + RBAC |
| Hardcoded secrets | KMS + secret manager |
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * on auth APIs | Explicit CORS allowlist |
| Storing consent with profile data | Dedicated consent store |
| PII in GET query params | POST body or authenticated session |
| Sequential integer IDs in public URLs | UUIDs |
| "Anonymized" data with quasi-identifiers | Apply k-anonymity, test linkage resistance |
| Mixing backup regions outside EEA | Explicit region lockdown on backup jobs |
15. PR Review Checklist
Data model
- Every new PII column has a documented purpose and retention period.
- Sensitive fields (health, financial, national ID) use column-level encryption.
- No sequential integer PKs as public-facing identifiers.
API
- No PII in URL paths or query parameters.
- All endpoints returning personal data are authenticated.
- Ownership checks present — user cannot access another user's resource.
- Rate limiting applied to sensitive endpoints.
Logging
- No passwords, tokens, or credentials logged.
- IPs anonymized (last octet masked).
- No full request/response bodies logged where PII may be present.
Infrastructure
- No public storage buckets or public-IP databases.
- New cloud resources tagged with
DataClassification. - Encryption at rest enabled for new storage resources.
- New geographic regions for data storage are EEA-compliant or covered by SCCs.
Secrets & CI/CD
- No secrets in source code or committed config files.
- New secrets added to KMS and secrets inventory document.
- CI/CD secrets masked in pipeline logs.
Retention & erasure
- Retention enforcement job or policy covers new data store or field.
- Erasure pipeline updated to cover new data store.
User rights & governance
- Data export endpoint includes any new personal data field.
- RoPA updated if a new processing activity is introduced.
- New sub-processors have a signed DPA and a RoPA entry.
- DPIA triggered if the change involves high-risk processing.
Golden Rule: Collect less. Store less. Expose less. Retain less.
Every byte of personal data you do not collect is a byte you cannot lose, cannot breach, and cannot be held liable for.
Inspired by CNIL developer GDPR guidance, GDPR Articles 5, 25, 32, 33, 35, ENISA, OWASP, and NIST engineering best practices.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

