feature-discovery
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Pre-plan discovery workflow for features whose viability depends on third-party integrations, platform policies, or unfamiliar constraints — reads product specs, scopes the codebase (monorepo-aware), runs deep parallel research per named integration to surface real limits/quotas/gotchas, reads the current state of the relevant code, then dispatches an adversarial panel that tries to break the proposed approach along three lenses (constraints & policy, edge cases & failure modes, alternatives & prior art). Produces a `.discovery/<slug>/discovery.html` decision artifact that captures constraints, weighed architecture options, surfaced edge cases, and open questions — NOT a build plan. Use this whenever the user has a feature idea that involves external integrations (Stripe, RevenueCat, IAP, Firebase, Supabase, AI providers, payments, auth, etc.), platform-specific rules (App Store / Play Store policies), or an architecture they aren't yet sure will hold — including "/feature-discovery", "vamos descobrir se essa feature funciona", "quero pressure-testar essa ideia", "que restrições X tem?", "que edge cases eu não vi nessa feature?", "quais as gotchas de integrar com X", "let's pressure-test this feature", "what constraints does X impose", or "help me argue against this approach before I commit". This runs BEFORE `plan-phases` — its output feeds the plan when the user commits to a direction. Do NOT use for bug fixes, small tweaks, or features where the architecture is already settled — for those, go straight to `plan-phases` or just do the work.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Echo-Scion/portable-brainvibingtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- RaditteAnggoro/skill-for-lazy-developertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Echo-Scion/orioncortextheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- juanitourquiza/shipframetheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
- adam-paterson/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use systematic-debugging and code-review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
OpenAISkillsystematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- juanitourquiza/shipframe★ 4same name
- Echo-Scion/orioncortex★ 2same name
- Echo-Scion/portable-brainvibing★ 2same name
- adam-paterson/skills★ 1same name
- RaditteAnggoro/skill-for-lazy-developer★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- create-dev-taskSkill
- dev-days-estimateSkill
- list-sessionsSkill
- plan-phasesSkill
- qa-test-planSkill
- session-handoffSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

