stop-that-shit
Skill4.1k starsChanged 20 days agoMITView on GitHub
Keep Piik implementation, debugging and review proportionate and complete. Use to control speculative defenses, research or verification loops, and when Stop That Shit or removal of overengineering is requested.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Trending
More talk lately.thin dataabout the whole repository
Most recently taken up by
- hua2003-liu/dsh-stop-that-shittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- lennney/stop-that-shittheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
Who's talking about TNTcraftHIM/Piik
- @hasamba72.bsky.social“Piik is an open-source screen sharing tool for up to 20 viewers. Watch in browser without installing. Uses …”Bluesky · Oct 1, 2026 · 2 likes
- aiaimimi0920/Otter“docs: redesign bilingual README presentation”GitHub · Oct 15, 2026 · 1 reactions
- BraveOPotato/NoSignups“[Tool Submission Request] Piik”GitHub · Nov 4, 2026
The biggest 3 of 3 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- lennney/stop-that-shit★ 3.7ksame name
- hua2003-liu/dsh-stop-that-shit★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- context-consistencySkill
- ponytailSkill
The file
Files
Stop That Shit · Piik
项目取舍
Piik 是供朋友分享的小项目。优先简单、好用、漂亮和实际效果,积极采用有收益的成熟方案与新技术。 不要按假想的百万级规模设计,不要追求覆盖一切极端情况、无限兼容或零风险。 复杂度、验证时间和维护负担都是真实成本。用户已经授权的合理工作,应当推进到可用结果。
这是工作尺度与收口方法;Ponytail 负责实现取舍。 AGENTS.md 规定权限与设计质量, CONTRIBUTING.md 规定交付流程。 新方法、新机制必须完整验证实际行为。减负不降低体验、审美或验证质量。
直接执行
- 让研究产生实现。 参考相关的一手实现,选出简单、可逆的方案就做对照。 一旦信息足够做决定,停止搜集同类材料。上游也有问题不等于只能接受;检查现有配置、 接口和小范围补丁。研究或审查任务仍按其授权范围交付,不自动变成实现。
- 新机制要验完整。 沿实际调用链验证预期效果及受影响的主路径,覆盖相关的失败、恢复 和生命周期行为;不能用一个 happy path 或孤立单测宣称完成。复用现有检查和复现,缺口 补有效回归。小文案、布局和可逆低影响改动不默认新增单元测试;不为每个分支、私有函数 或实现细节各造一套测试。同一机制的不同检查应回答不同的实际问题。
- 已回答的问题不要反复验。 相关代码、依赖、环境或证据没有变化,就复用有效结果。 失败后检查具体原因;修正后重跑受影响部分。全套检查按交付阶段执行,不在每次小改后重跑。 不为“再放心一点”追加矩阵、审计代理、证明文件或验证流程;明确要求的专项验收照常完成。
- 减负要真正删掉。 在当前范围内移除已替代实现、重复防御、无消费者的产物和重复测试。 不留注释代码、停用分支、过渡接口或长篇历史说明。仅用于本次调查的探针留在 ignored 工作目录;值得长期保留的事实更新现有文档所有者,不再建一套审计账本。
- 交付有用结果。 已授权的必要工作继续做,不停在计划、风险清单或“可以继续”。 请求的体验与职责完整、相关检查通过且没有已知阻断就收口;不能以“能跑”代替验收。 真正受阻时说明具体缺口和已尝试的方法。 不把未知说成已解决,也不把所有未知都变成发布门槛。汇报结果和影响决定的限制即可, 不用测试数量、长免责声明、反复道歉或未来待办替代成果。
参考来源与取舍保留在上下文治理研究, 不作为每次任务必读材料。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

