agentleFS
TJaenichenTJaenichen/claude-code-harness/skills/user/ask-codex/SKILL.md

ask-codex

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Consult OpenAI's Codex (ChatGPT) for a second opinion during planning, architecture decisions, code review, or any situation where a diverse AI perspective adds value. Runs `codex exec` and returns Codex's response for critical evaluation.

11 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when you need Codex's opinion during planning, architecture decisions, code review, or any situation where a diverse AI …

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Run the command below with your prompt

    line 17
  3. Distinctive:

    Always include sufficient context in the prompt (project details, constraints, what's already been decided)

    line 29
  4. Distinctive:

    When Codex's response conflicts with your own analysis, flag the disagreement for council discussion

    line 31
  5. Distinctive:

    Do NOT blindly accept Codex's output — treat it as one voice in the council

    line 32
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep prompts under 4000 characters for best results

    line 34

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Ask Codex

Consult OpenAI's Codex (ChatGPT) for its perspective on a topic.

Usage

Use this skill when you need Codex's opinion during planning, architecture decisions, code review, or any situation where a diverse AI perspective adds value.

Instructions

  1. Formulate a clear, specific prompt that includes relevant context
  2. Run the command below with your prompt
  3. Parse and critically evaluate Codex's response
  4. Incorporate useful insights into your reasoning

Command

codex exec --skip-git-repo-check "<your prompt here>"

Guidelines

  • Always include sufficient context in the prompt (project details, constraints, what's already been decided)
  • Frame questions to get actionable, specific answers rather than generic advice
  • When Codex's response conflicts with your own analysis, flag the disagreement for council discussion
  • Do NOT blindly accept Codex's output — treat it as one voice in the council
  • For multi-part questions, break them into separate calls for clearer responses
  • Keep prompts under 4000 characters for best results
  • Timeout: allow up to 60 seconds for a response

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.