skill-registry-catalog
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user wants to survey public agent-skill registries (skills.md, skillsmp.com) for a domain and build a categorized, source-cited catalog repo with approved/pending buckets and live ingestion counters — not for organizing skills already adopted into the user's own library.
In this repository58 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- api-test-suiteSkill
- ascii-artSkill
- caddy-reverse-proxySkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- color-palette-generatorSkill
- cron-taskSkill
- csv-toolkitSkill
- discord-bot-buildSkill
- docker-umbrellaSkill
- dotfiles-manageSkill
- email-sendSkill
- env-config-managerSkill
- excalidraw-diagramSkill
- file-organizerSkill
- forgejo-self-hostSkill
- frontend-design-toolkitSkill
- generate-dockerfileSkill
- gif-searchSkill
- git-backupSkill
- github-actions-ciSkill
- hallmark-readmeSkill
- http-api-testerSkill
- invoice-generatorSkill
- json-formatterSkill
- log-analyzerSkill
- markdown-linterSkill
- markdown-to-pdfSkill
- markdown-to-slidesSkill
- mcp-server-buildSkill
- media-id-mappingSkill
- movie-catalogue-siteSkill
- movie-night-calendarSkill
- ntfy-notifierSkill
- ocr-documentsSkill
- ollama-localSkill
- openapi-generatorSkill
- password-generatorSkill
- pdf-extractSkill
- portfolio-upkeepSkill
- qr-code-generatorSkill
- regex-testerSkill
- resume-builderSkill
- rss-monitorSkill
- searxng-self-hostSkill
- skill-publishSkill
- skills-portfolio-scaffoldSkill
- snippet-managerSkill
- sqlite-dashboardSkill
- streaming-provider-embedsSkill
- tailscale-deploySkill
- telegram-bot-buildSkill
- tmdb-metadataSkill
- uptime-kuma-self-hostSkill
- watchlist-syncSkill
- webhook-receiverSkill
- youtube-transcriptSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 108
Run each skill through the category maps.
- Very specific: line 195
Put three workflows in your git host's CI directory (GitHub: .github/workflows/.
- Very specific: line 216
Parsing the skills.md response with a bare
json.loads: When multiple candidate URLs are fetched together in one console call, the …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
skill-registry-catalog
Overview
Build a categorized, source-cited catalog of third-party agent skills harvested from public
registries. Each skill is separated from your own library so it is easy to triage — approved
skills (matching your local library) and pending skills (awaiting human review) live in their
own folders, with a master CATALOG.md and live ingestion counters.
When to Use
- Survey public skill registries (skills.md, skillsmp.com) for specific domains — Discord, security/pentest, backend, API, MCP, frontend, etc.
- Produce a repo the user can browse and approve/reject one skill at a time.
- Track ingestion volume over time (hour / day / week / month / year / all-time).
- The user asks to "look at these registries and catalog the skills" or "track external skills separated from my own."
Sources
Two public registries are the defaults. Fetch structured data from their JSON APIs, not the HTML pages.
| Registry | List page | JSON API | Notes |
| skills.md | https://skills.md/skills | https://skills.md/api/skills | Returns the full array in one call |
| skillsmp.com | https://skillsmp.com/search | https://skillsmp.com/api/skills?page=N&limit=100 | Caps at 100/page — must paginate |
Fetch from terminal with curl/urllib, or from the browser console with fetch(). Keep
the HTML pages for visual confirmation only; the catalog data comes from the JSON.
Response shapes (abridged)
skills.md element:
{"name":"api-test-suite","displayName":"API Test Suite",
"description":"Generate and run API test suites...","category":"Development Tools",
"tags":["api","testing","automation","qa"],"pricing":{"tier":"free"},"source":"official"}skillsmp.com element:
{"id":"...","name":"openspec-apply-change","author":"Orient-Software-Development",
"description":"...","githubUrl":"https://github.com/.../tree/main/.claude/skills/...",
"stars":0,"updatedAt":"1783911957","path":"SKILL.md",
"route":{"ownerSlug":"...","repoSlug":"...","routeSlug":"...","sourceSkillPath":"..."}}Parsing quirks (real, not theoretical)
- skillsmp.com caps at 100 per response even if you pass
limit=1000. Paginatepage=1..Nuntil a page returns[]or fewer than 100 items:all_sk = [] for p in range(1, 30): d = json.load(urlopen(f"https://skillsmp.com/api/skills?page={p}&limit=100")) s = d.get("skills", []) if not s: break all_sk += s - skills.md
/api/skillscan return the JSON array concatenated with===plus an HTML error page if multiple candidate URLs were fetched together in one console call. Slice before parsing:raw = wrapper["result"] end = raw.find("}]") + 2 skills = json.loads(raw[:end]) - skillsmp.com
/api/search?q=returns 404. There is no text-search API — pull the full paginated/api/skillsand filter client-side.
Workflow
1. Confirm sources and categories
Agree the registries and focus categories with the user (e.g. Discord, Security/Pentest, Backend,
API, MCP). Categories are defined as regex keyword maps over each skill's
name + description + tags + category/author (lower-cased).
CATS = {
"Discord": [r"discord"],
"Security/Pentest":[r"security", r"pentest", r"penetration", r"vuln", r"\baudit\b",
r"exploit", r"\bcve\b", r"secure", r"threat", r"secret", r"\bauth\b",
r"hardening"],
"Backend": [r"backend", r"server", r"\bdb\b", r"database", r"orm", r"microservice",
r"fastapi", r"django", r"express", r"\bsql\b"],
"API": [r"\bapi\b", r"\brest\b", r"graphql", r"openapi", r"endpoint",
r"webhook", r"\bsdk\b"],
"MCP": [r"\bmcp\b", r"model context protocol", r"mcp server", r"mcp client"],
}2. Extract + filter
- Pull both datasets as JSON (see quirks above).
- Run each skill through the category maps; a skill hits a category if any pattern matches.
- Cross-reference each skill name against the user's local skill library to decide approved vs pending (see Filtering).
- Dedupe by
(source, name).
3. Build the catalog repo
<repo>/
├── README.md # overview + live COUNTERS block
├── CATALOG.md # 3-bucket master list (approved / pending / other)
├── .github/workflows/ # validate.yml, counters.yml, rescan.yml
├── scripts/ # build_catalog.py, counters.py
└── skills/
├── approved/<name>__<source>/{README.md, SKILL.md}
└── pending/<name>__<source>/{README.md, SKILL.md}- Per-skill
SKILL.mdfrontmatter:name,source(direct registry URL),status(approved|pending),incorporated_as(for approved). - Per-skill
README.md: description, metadata table, Original URL, an action checkbox for review. - Folder names join skill and source so the same skill from two registries does not collide:
<name>__<source>(e.g.api-test-suite__skills.md).
4. Cross-reference against local library
Decide approved vs pending:
- Approved — the skill's name or function overlaps an existing local skill, or it is a known upgrade of one you already use. Keep the match loose-but-verified.
- Other — does not fit any focus category and is not approved; still recorded so re-scans
stay stable.
Require either exact local-skill-name containment or an explicit
known_upgradesmap (e.g.api-test-suite,backend-patterns,generate-dockerfile,repo-security-audit,discord-suite). Reject bare substring hits (image,write,backend) — they over-match.
Catalog Structure
CATALOG.md is the master index with three buckets:
# Catalog
## Approved (already in your library)
| Name | Source | Category | Local match |
|---|---|---|---|
| api-test-suite | skills.md | Backend/API | api-test-suite |
## Pending (awaiting review)
| Name | Source | Category | Original URL |
|---|---|---|---|
| some-new-skill | skillsmp.com | MCP | https://... |
## Other (out of focus, not approved)
| Name | Source | Category |
|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... |Each per-skill folder has a self-contained README.md with an [ ] reviewed checkbox so a
human can tick skills off one at a time.
Counters
The user wants time-window tracking. README.md carries a fenced block that the counter script
rewrites from git history:
<!-- COUNTERS_START -->
| Window | Skills Added |
|---|---|
| Past hour | 0 |
| Past 24h | 0 |
| Past 7d | 0 |
| Past 30d | 0 |
| Past 6mo | 0 |
| Past 1y | 0 |
| All time | 0 |
<!-- COUNTERS_END -->scripts/counters.py --patch computes the counts from the commit timestamps of added files under
skills/ and rewrites the block in place:
git log --diff-filter=A --name-only --pretty=%ct -- skills/ \
| python scripts/counters.py --patchCI/Automation
Put three workflows in your git host's CI directory (GitHub: .github/workflows/; Forgejo:
.forgejo/workflows/; GitLab: .gitlab-ci.yml). Use [skip ci] in counter-commit messages to
avoid loops.
- validate.yml — on push/PR, lint every
SKILL.mdfrontmatter (required:name,source,status;status ∈ {approved, pending}). - counters.yml — scheduled hourly + on push; runs
counters.py --patchand commits if the block changed. - rescan.yml — scheduled weekly; re-fetches both APIs, diffs new names against existing
skills/entries, and opens one review issue per new focus skill (labels:pending-approval,source:*,cat:*).
Issue posting uses your git host's REST API with a token. Labels usually require numeric IDs
(GitHub: labels: [id,...]), so fetch the label list first and map name → id. Never embed the
token in source; read it from a CI secret.
Common Pitfalls
- Trusting a single
limit=1000call on skillsmp.com. The API caps at 100/page regardless of the requested limit. Looppage=1..Nuntil a page returns[]or fewer than 100 items, or the catalog silently truncates. - Parsing the skills.md response with a bare
json.loads. When multiple candidate URLs are fetched together in one console call, the response can be the JSON array concatenated with===plus a trailing HTML error page. Slice at the first}]before parsing. - Calling
/api/search?q=on skillsmp.com. There is no text-search endpoint — it 404s. Pull the full paginated/api/skillsand filter client-side instead. - Approving on a bare substring match. Matching
image,write, orbackendas a substring over-matches unrelated skills. Require exact local-skill-name containment or an explicitknown_upgradesmap before marking a skillapproved. - Declaring the catalog "done." It's a living artifact — re-scans keep adding entries. Hand the live repo URL to the user for visual verification instead of self-certifying completion.
- Letting the counters workflow commit without
[skip ci]. A counter-update commit that doesn't skip CI retriggers the same workflow, creating a commit loop. - Using a read-only token for issue/label creation. The
rescan.ymlworkflow needs write scope on the target repo; a read-only token fails with 403. Labels also usually require numeric IDs — fetch the label list first and mapname → id.
Verification Checklist
- Both registries pulled from their JSON APIs (not scraped HTML), with skillsmp.com paginated
to a page returning
[]or< 100items. - Every entry deduped by
(source, name)before it lands inCATALOG.md. - Every
approvedentry has a verified local-skill-name match or an explicit upgrade-map hit — no bare substring approvals. CATALOG.md's three buckets (Approved / Pending / Other) match the per-skill folders underskills/approved/andskills/pending/.- The
COUNTERS_START/COUNTERS_ENDblock reflects real git history, not placeholder zeros. validate.yml,counters.yml, andrescan.ymlare present and counter/rescan commits include[skip ci].
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

