maintain
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when doing periodic upkeep of a live product - or when the user says maintenance, update dependencies, check errors, housekeeping, is prod healthy. Run it monthly per live product.
20 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- inoio/agents-sandboxtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- srinator22/New-Projecttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- devantler-tech/ksailtheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- jamesm-dev/tateru.devtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- exmergo/dextheir own version, first seen Oct 31, 2026
- constant-itis/mycelium-memorytheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ship and release.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AWSSkillship
Finalize dev work on an issue branch — update docs, push, and open a PR.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillrelease
Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks to cut/publish a Huabu desktop release or tag a version. Performs an outward action — bumps the version in apps/desktop/package.json, commits + annotated-tags vX.Y.Z, and pushes the branch + tag. That tag push auto-builds the macOS/Windows installers and publishes a GitHub Release. Provides `status`, `bump`, `tag-push`, and a one-command `run` (bump → tag-push).
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions20 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 20
- garrytan/gbrain★ 32ksame name
- slopus/happy★ 25ksame name
- PhilipK/BoilR★ 1.9ksame name
- GlassHaven/Haven★ 1.4ksame name
- GlassOnTin/Haven★ 1.4ksame name
- iovisor/ubpf★ 996same name
- everruns/bashkit★ 325same name
- devantler-tech/ksail★ 164same name
- exmergo/dex★ 116same name
- inoio/agents-sandbox★ 84same name
10 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- add-aiSkill
- add-authSkill
- growSkill
- hardenSkill
- hireSkill
- launchSkill
- monetizeSkill
- new-projectSkill
- optimizeSkill
- pitchSkill
- product-specSkill
- ship-itSkill
- validate-ideaSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Keep a live product healthy with a repeatable monthly sweep — don't wait for it to break.
- Distinctive: line 32
Run tests, typecheck, and a production build after any dependency change.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Maintain
Keep a live product healthy with a repeatable monthly sweep — don't wait for it to break.
Copy this checklist and check off items as you complete them:
Maintain Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Health snapshot
- [ ] Step 2: Dependencies
- [ ] Step 3: Verify after updates (mandatory)
- [ ] Step 4: Data safety
- [ ] Step 5: Sweep
- [ ] ReportStep 1 — Health snapshot
Pull platform logs for fresh errors (vercel logs, supabase MCP get_logs). Note the current error rate and compare hosting/API costs (Vercel, Supabase, any metered LLM usage) against last period — real numbers or stop and say the dashboard wasn't checked. Any figure not pulled from a live source this run is an unverified assumption; label it as such in the report.
Step 2 — Dependencies
Run security advisories first — npm audit / pip-audit. Critical vulnerabilities get fixed now, no exceptions. Apply patch and minor updates in the same pass. List major updates as candidates only — never auto-apply one. Exception to the ordering: when a critical vulnerability's only fix is a major bump, that upgrade task starts now instead of waiting as a candidate. Delegate to the refactor-engineer agent with the current version, target version, and changelog/migration notes (fetched via the context7 MCP tools) as its own task; a major upgrade needs its own plan and test pass, not a slot in a routine sweep.
Step 3 — Verify after updates (mandatory)
Run tests, typecheck, and a production build after any dependency change. Paste the real output — not "should be fine." A failure rolls the update back immediately; debug on a branch rather than leaving a broken bump sitting on top of a working product.
Step 4 — Data safety
Confirm backups exist, then restore-test one thing on a branch or staging — never against production. Supabase: use PITR or a branch restore. An untested backup is a hope, not a backup; if the restore-test fails, or hasn't been run this cycle, say so plainly instead of assuming it would work.
Step 5 — Sweep
Triage the error log from Step 1 into fix-now vs backlog. Flag any cost anomaly (spike vs last period, a metered API creeping toward a plan limit) even without a diagnosis yet — flagging it is the job for this pass, not root-causing it on the spot.
Nothing in this skill commits, pushes, deploys, or publishes on its own — patch/minor updates and restore-tests stay local or on a branch/staging; ask before anything lands on production or main. Secrets stay in env vars and are never printed, logged, or pasted into the report.
Report
- Prod health: error rate and fresh errors from Step 1, with the log source checked.
- Updates applied: patch/minor updates applied, with verification output from Step 3.
- Deferred majors: major versions available, queued for the refactor-engineer agent, not applied.
- Backup status: backup confirmed plus restore-test result — pass, fail, or not run.
- Cost trend: current period vs last period, any anomaly flagged.
- Backlog additions: errors triaged to backlog rather than fixed this cycle.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

