skillify
Skill0 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user wants to take a concept observed in an external tool, library, methodology or article (e.g. Ruflo, LangGraph, BMAD, a blog post, a paper) and turn it into a reusable Claude Code skill — keeping the idea, dropping the rest. Triggers on phrases like "skillify this", "make a skill out of X", "extract this pattern as a skill", or after the user identifies a useful concept while testing a tool.
51 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- devjiwonchoi/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- kyle-chalmers/ticketwrighttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- timurgaleev/vibestacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- fmind/dottheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- fmind/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecodetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use plan-tune, ios-clean and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ShreyRaviSkillplan-tune
Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.
Also in 9 projects that use this
Saqlain-811Skillios-clean
Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)
Also in 5 projects that use this
Saqlain-811Skillios-fix
Autonomous iOS bug fixer. (gstack)
Also in 5 projects that use this
ShreyRaviSkilllanding-report
Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)
Also in 8 projects that use this
timurgaleevSkilldocument-generate
Generate missing docs for a feature, module or project as tutorials, how-tos, reference and explanation.
Also in 7 projects that use this
bastosSkillios-design-review
Review iOS app UI/UX design quality using Apple's design principles and the Liquid Glass-era design language from WWDC25/26. Use when asked for a design review, UX critique, visual design assessment, or evaluation of an app's interface quality, design intent, alignment with the new Apple design system, or usability. Triggers: "design review", "UX review", "visual design critique", "review the UI", "does this design work", "evaluate this interface", "design feedback", "Liquid Glass review".
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +1 more from Saqlain-811
- +5 more from ShreyRavi
Other versions51 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 51
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- garrytan/gbrain★ 32ksame name
- vudovn/ag-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- vudovn/antigravity-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- ZhangHanDong/harness-engineering-from-cc-to-ai-coding★ 1.5ksame name
- coreyhaines31/makerskills★ 893same name
- 0xMH/claude-skillify★ 45same name
- Surething-io/cockpit★ 44same name
41 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 44 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 33
If the user is unsure, ask via AskUserQuestion before proceeding.
- Very specific: line 48
If the source is online, WebFetch the relevant page(s) to anchor on facts.
- Very specific: line 62
Write a fresh SKILL.md at .claude/skills/<kebab-name>/SKILL.md.
- Very specific: line 84
Create .claude/skills/<kebab-name>/INSTRUCTIONS.md next to SKILL.md with three install paths:
- Very specific: line 92
Update or create a memory note under ~/.claude/projects/<project>/memory/ :
- Very specific: line 93
If a <tool>_learnings_to_apply.md exists (e.g.
- Distinctive: line 94
If the source is new (a blog post, a fresh tool), create a new memory note with the source URL, the kept/dropped breakdown, and the skill …
- Very specific: line 95
Update MEMORY.md index with the new memory.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 44 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skillify
Transforms a useful concept observed in an external tool / framework / methodology / article into a self-contained Claude Code skill — without adopting the source tool itself.
When to use this skill
Use skillify when:
- A tool has a great idea but its full install is too invasive (Ruflo's SPARC, plugin systems, hook patterns, memory architectures…)
- A blog post / paper describes a workflow worth keeping (Hamel's eval rubric, an Anthropic engineering pattern, a SPARC-like methodology…)
- The user says "I want to keep this idea but not the whole tool"
Don't use skillify when:
- The concept is already trivially covered by an existing skill (check first)
- The concept needs runtime/daemon/database (it's a service, not a skill)
- The user wants to actually adopt the tool itself (just install it then)
Heuristic: skillify vs adopt-as-tool
| Skillify | Adopt as tool |
| Concept fits in 100-300 lines of SKILL.md | Needs runtime/daemon |
| Source tool has friction you want to skip | Source tool is mature & cohesive |
| You want reversibility | You want fail-fast on the whole thing |
| 1-2 users (you) | Team adoption |
If the user is unsure, ask via AskUserQuestion before proceeding.
The 5-step procedure
Track each step with TodoWrite from the start. Don't skip — each step de-risks the next.
Step 1 — Spot
Confirm what concept the user wants to skillify. If <argument-hint> is vague, ask:
- What's the idea (1 sentence)?
- Where did you see it (URL, repo, doc, conversation)?
- Why does it resonate (what problem does it solve for you)?
If the source is online, WebFetch the relevant page(s) to anchor on facts. If it's from a tool you tested, read the existing memory note (memory/<tool>_learnings*.md if present).
Step 2 — Isolate
Separate the idea (keep) from the packaging (drop).
For each concept, list explicitly:
- ✅ What we keep: the core mechanic, decision rule, mental model, sequence
- ❌ What we drop: deps, runtime, lock-in, naming/branding, sidecar features
Output: a 5-10 bullet "spec" of what the skill must do. If you can't articulate it in bullets, you don't understand it well enough yet — go back to Step 1.
Step 3 — Re-implement
Write a fresh SKILL.md at .claude/skills/<kebab-name>/SKILL.md. Don't copy-paste from the source — write it from understanding.
Required frontmatter:
---
name: <kebab-name>
description: <when-to-use sentence ≤200 chars, includes trigger phrases>
argument-hint: <if it takes args>
allowed-tools: <minimal set needed>
---Body structure (adapt as fits):
- When to use / When not to use (mirror this very SKILL.md)
- The procedure (numbered steps, with TodoWrite tracking if multi-phase)
- Examples (1-2 short, concrete)
- Anti-patterns (what to avoid)
Cap target: under 250 lines. If it exceeds, split into companion files (e.g. examples.md, references.md) referenced from SKILL.md.
Step 4 — Document install paths
Create .claude/skills/<kebab-name>/INSTRUCTIONS.md next to SKILL.md with three install paths:
- Project-local (default): the skill lives in this repo, available only when Claude Code is invoked here.
- User-global:
cp -r .claude/skills/<kebab-name> ~/.claude/skills/to make it available across all projects. - Symlink for live edits:
ln -s "$(pwd)/.claude/skills/<kebab-name>" ~/.claude/skills/<kebab-name>so iterating in the project also updates the global version.
Step 5 — Save the learning
Update or create a memory note under ~/.claude/projects/<project>/memory/ :
- If a
<tool>_learnings_to_apply.mdexists (e.g.ruflo_learnings_to_apply.md), mark this learning as ✅ done with a link to the skill path. - If the source is new (a blog post, a fresh tool), create a new memory note with the source URL, the kept/dropped breakdown, and the skill path.
- Update
MEMORY.mdindex with the new memory.
Then propose a quick commit: feat(skill): add <kebab-name> skill (skillified from <source>).
Examples
SPARC (skillified from Ruflo, 2026-05-08): the SPARC methodology was bundled inside Ruflo's invasive install. We kept the methodology (Specification → Pseudocode → Architecture → Refinement → Completion) and dropped Ruflo. Result: .claude/skills/sparc/SKILL.md. Usage: /sparc add user authentication.
Two install paths (skillified from Ruflo's docs, hypothetical): Ruflo offers a "lite" plugin install vs a "full" npx ruflo init. The pattern of offering both modes is itself worth keeping. Could be skillified as /install-paths that audits a tool you're shipping and ensures it offers a lite mode.
Anti-patterns
- ❌ Skillifying things that should be a script, a config file, or a memory note instead. If there's no decision logic the skill would guide Claude through, it's not a skill.
- ❌ Copy-pasting the source's SKILL.md text wholesale. Re-implement from understanding — that's what de-risks lock-in.
- ❌ Skipping Step 5 (memory). Without it, the skillify origin is lost; in 6 months no one remembers where the idea came from.
- ❌ Creating skills with overlapping descriptions. Before you write,
Glob ~/.claude/skills/**/SKILL.mdand read existing descriptions to avoid trigger collisions. - ❌ Skills > 500 lines. Split or simplify.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

