project-knowledge
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Codebase Memory MCP read and write protocols, durable architectural decisions, root-cause knowledge persistence, and secret-free knowledge graphs.
- Reads credentials
16 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kkxdev/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-templatetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- eugenelim/agent-ready-repotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- soumyaRauth/skills-hubtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- arctan303/creator.skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- phanijapps/memextheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
Other versions16 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 16
- JanDeDobbeleer/oh-my-posh★ 24ksame name
- alibaba/loongcollector★ 2.2ksame name
- toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-template★ 77same name
- eugenelim/agent-ready-repo★ 28same name
- arctan303/creator.skill★ 19same name
- soumyaRauth/skills-hub★ 10same name
- mnemonik-xyz/monorepo★ 3same name
- jblossey/houserules★ 2same name
- dlimkin/agent-skills★ 1same name
- kkxdev/claude-skills★ 1same name
6 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- adr-managementSkill
- agentic-developmentSkill
- ci-cdSkill
- code-architectureSkill
- database-postgresqlSkill
- data-engineeringSkill
- debuggingSkill
- deep-learningSkill
- dependency-managementSkill
- deploymentSkill
- dockerSkill
- documentation-orchestratorSkill
- documentationSkill
- environment-guardrailsSkill
- frontend-react-typescriptSkill
- git-githubSkill
- machine-learningSkill
- observabilitySkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- portfolio-readinessSkill
- project-bootstrapSkill
- python-apiSkill
- python-environmentSkill
- rag-ocr-llmSkill
- release-engineeringSkill
- reusable-componentsSkill
- security-secretsSkill
- supply-chain-securitySkill
- testing-qualitySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use this skill when:
- Distinctive: line 15
Never use this skill to store ephemeral chatter, full file dumps, or raw code that is already tracked in Git.
- Very specific: line 22
Check if MCP memory tools are available in the current session (codebase-memory-mcp tools like search_graph, query_graph, or standard tools …
- Very specific: line 27
Ensure NO credentials, .env values, API keys, passwords, or personal identifying information are present in memory payloads.
- Distinctive: line 120
NEVER store speculative assumptions: Only store decisions that have been tested, approved, or verified.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Project Knowledge (Codebase Memory) Skill
1. When Should I Use This?
Use this skill when:
- Reading prior architectural decisions, known root causes, or design constraints before undertaking major changes.
- Writing durable project knowledge, newly discovered constraints, or resolved root causes after completing a significant task.
- Interacting with the official Codebase Memory MCP Server (
@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory) or local knowledge graph.
Never use this skill to store ephemeral chatter, full file dumps, or raw code that is already tracked in Git.
2. What Should I Inspect First?
- MCP Memory Server Availability:
- Check if MCP memory tools are available in the current session (
codebase-memory-mcptools likesearch_graph,query_graph, or standard tools likeread_graph,create_entities,create_relations,search_nodes). - Use existing active MCP servers directly — never attempt to install or spawn a duplicate server.
- Check if MCP memory tools are available in the current session (
- Local Memory Manifest:
- Inspect
docs/decisions/(ADRs),mcp/memory-schema.md, or project knowledge files.
- Inspect
- Secret Scan:
- Ensure NO credentials,
.envvalues, API keys, passwords, or personal identifying information are present in memory payloads.
- Ensure NO credentials,
3. What Workflow Should I Follow?
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ READ MEMORY TRIGGERS │
│ - Before major architecture changes │
│ - Before major dependency additions / upgrades │
│ - Before database schema alterations │
│ - Before deployment platform / cloud config changes │
│ - Before investigating recurring or complex bugs │
└──────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘
│
│ [ Execute Development / Task ]
│
┌──────────────────────────────▼──────────────────────────────┐
│ WRITE MEMORY TRIGGERS │
│ - After completing an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) │
│ - After isolating & fixing a non-obvious root-cause bug │
│ - After rejecting an approach with a concrete reason │
│ - After discovering critical performance or latency limits │
│ - After verifying a production deployment runbook │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Memory Entity Categories & Schema
┌──────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Entity Type │ Purpose & Example Observation │
├──────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Architecture │ Core system patterns ("FastAPI 4-tier layered architecture") │
│ Decision │ Chosen tech & rationale ("FAISS chosen for low-latency local RAG")│
│ Dependency │ Pinned constraint reasons ("TensorFlow 2.16 pinned for Keras 3") │
│ BugFix │ Resolved root cause ("DST duplicate hour resolved via mean agg") │
│ RejectedApproach │ Failed experiment ("Pinecone rejected due to external API latency")│
│ DeploymentRule │ Hosting constraints ("Render free tier requires pool_size=5") │
│ ReusableUtility │ Shared library location ("StatusBadge in src/components/ui/") │
└──────────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Structured Memory Creation Pattern (MCP Tool Format)
{
"entities": [
{
"name": "Decision: FAISS Vector Store",
"entityType": "Decision",
"observations": [
"Selected FAISS IndexFlatIP with normalized SentenceTransformer embeddings.",
"Chosen over Pinecone and Qdrant to enable 100% self-hosted, offline Docker deployments with zero network overhead.",
"Requires re-indexing or local disk serialization upon container startup."
]
},
{
"name": "BugFix: Daylight Saving Time Timestamp Duplication",
"entityType": "BugFix",
"observations": [
"Historical hourly energy data contains 1 duplicate hour in November due to clock fallback.",
"Resolved by grouping by timestamp and applying mean aggregation in data_engineering/pipeline.py.",
"Prevents indexing errors in downstream lag and rolling statistics calculations."
]
}
],
"relations": [
{
"from": "Decision: FAISS Vector Store",
"to": "DocMind RAG Pipeline",
"relationType": "implements_semantic_search_for"
}
]
}4. What Decisions Should I Make?
| Information Category | Decision Rule |
| Is it worth storing in memory? | Store if it prevents future agents or developers from making the same mistake or repeating a 30-minute discovery phase. Do not store trivial facts like "app.py exists". |
| Granularity | Use concise, structured bullet points (1-3 sentences per observation). Avoid giant multi-page markdown dumps inside single memory nodes. |
| Format | Link related decisions using relations (e.g. Decision X supersedes Decision Y or BugFix A resolved_in Module B). |
5. What Should I Avoid?
- NEVER store secrets in memory: API keys, database connection strings with passwords, JWT secret tokens, and bearer tokens are strictly forbidden.
- NEVER store speculative assumptions: Only store decisions that have been tested, approved, or verified.
- NEVER store transient debug logs: Memory is for durable, long-term engineering knowledge.
6. How Should I Verify Success?
# 1. Query memory to verify newly added entities
# (Using MCP search_nodes tool or inspecting local ADRs)
# 2. Verify ADR sync
ls docs/decisions/Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

