open_source_prep
Skill3 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Comprehensive workflow to prepare a project for public open-source release. Handles licensing, username normalization, code integrity checks, and documentation generation.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- krishnakanthb13/antigravity_global_skillsedited, first seen Jul 4, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- krishnakanthb13/antigravity_global_skills★ 50100% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository46 other files it gives its agents.
- agy-customizationsSkill
- antigravity-guideSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code_reviewSkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- create_launcherSkill
- create_skillSkill
- daily_logSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- debug_issueSkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- document_apiSkill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- enhance_uiSkill
- frontend_designSkill
- frontend-ui-engineeringSkill
- generate_release_imageSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- idea-refineSkill
- idea_to_actionSkill
- impeccableSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- list_featuresSkill
- optimize_codebaseSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- permissioned-githubSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- release_helperSkill
- repo_infographicSkill
- scaffold_testsSkill
- security-and-hardeningSkill
- security_auditSkill
- shipping-and-launchSkill
- software_architectureSkill
- spec-driven-developmentSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- test_runnerSkill
- ui_ux_pro_maxSkill
- update_docsSkill
- using-agent-skillsSkill
- using-ui-stackSkill
- web_performance_optimizationSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
Use grep_search to find placeholders (YOUR_USERNAME).
- Very specific: line 18
Use replace_file_content to update files.
- Very specific: line 19
Use run_command (curl) to fetch licenses.
- Distinctive: line 25
Verification: Ensure all major parts of the codebase work together.
- Distinctive: line 32
If exists: Add the standard header:
- Very specific: line 41
Search and replace the following placeholders with krishnakanthb13:
- Very specific: line 92
Add bug_report.md (Steps to reproduce, Expected vs Actual, Environment).
- Very specific: line 93
Add feature_request.md (Problem, Proposed Solution, Alternatives).
- Very specific: line 94
Create .github/pull_request_template.md (Checklist for tests, docs, breaking changes).
- Distinctive: line 98
Gitignore: Ensure secrets, logs, and artifacts are ignored.
- Distinctive: line 99
References: Verify all file paths in docs are accurate.
- Distinctive: line 100
Badges: Add GPL v3 badge to README.md.
- Distinctive: line 101
Consistency: Ensure consistent naming and tone across all files.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Open Source Release Preparation
This skill guides you through the process of preparing a project for a public GitHub release.
Inputs
- GitHub Username: The target username for links/licensing.
- Project Root: The directory to prep.
Tooling Strategy
- Use
grep_searchto find placeholders (YOUR_USERNAME). - Use
replace_file_contentto update files. - Use
run_command(curl) to fetch licenses.
0. Code Integrity & Feature Verification
Before touching documentation:
- Verification: Ensure all major parts of the codebase work together. identify broken flows or unused modules.
- Clarification: Explain all features and their interactions.
- Assumptions: explicitly call out limitations or expected runtime behaviors.
1. License Management
- Check for
LICENSEfile:- If exists: Add the standard header:
- Project Name & one-line description
Copyright (C) 2026 Krishna Kanth B- Standard GPL v3 boilerplate notice.
- Separator line.
- If missing: Download GPL v3 text (use
curl https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt) and prepend the header above.
- If exists: Add the standard header:
2. Username Standardization
Search and replace the following placeholders with krishnakanthb13:
YOUR_USERNAMEyour-usernameYOUR-USERNAME<username>
Scope: README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, config files, scripts, and comments.
3. Documentation Suite
A. CODE_DOCUMENTATION.md
- Source inspiration:
codewalkthrough.mdorcode_readme.md(if they exist). - Structure:
- File & Folder structure with descriptions.
- High-level architecture.
- Core modules/functions table.
- Data flow (ASCII/Mermaid diagrams).
- Dependencies (runtime vs dev).
- Execution flow (Entry -> Output).
B. DESIGN_PHILOSOPHY.md
- Source inspiration:
walkthrough.mdorcontext_readme.md(if they exist). - Content:
- Problem definition.
- Why this solution?
- Design Principles (Simplicity, Performance, etc.).
- Target Audience & Use Cases.
- Real-world workflow fit.
- Trade-offs & Constraints.
C. CONTRIBUTING.md
- Create if missing.
- Content:
- Bug reporting formats.
- Feature suggestion process.
- Workflow: Fork -> Branch -> PR.
- Local dev setup.
- Pre-submission checklist (Testing/Validation).
D. SECURITY.md & CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
- SECURITY.md: Provide clear instructions on how to report vulnerabilities privately (e.g., security email) and supported versions.
- CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md: Adopt a standard code of conduct (e.g., Contributor Covenant) to establish community guidelines.
E. Issue & PR Templates
- Create
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/folder. - Add
bug_report.md(Steps to reproduce, Expected vs Actual, Environment). - Add
feature_request.md(Problem, Proposed Solution, Alternatives). - Create
.github/pull_request_template.md(Checklist for tests, docs, breaking changes).
4. Final Polish
- Gitignore: Ensure secrets, logs, and artifacts are ignored.
- References: Verify all file paths in docs are accurate.
- Badges: Add GPL v3 badge to
README.md. - Consistency: Ensure consistent naming and tone across all files.
Metadata
- GitHub Username:
krishnakanthb13 - Copyright Holder:
Krishna Kanth B
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

