worktrunk
Skill5 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Guidance for Worktrunk (the `wt` CLI) — git worktree management, hooks, and config. Load when working out which worktree a `wt` command will act on, or reaching for the global `-C <path>` to target one; editing .config/wt.toml or ~/.config/worktrunk/config.toml; adding, modifying, or debugging hooks (post-merge, post-start, pre-commit, pre-merge, post-switch, etc.); configuring commit message generation or command aliases; or troubleshooting wt behavior. Also answers general worktrunk/wt questions.
- Reads credentials
- Deletes or force-pushes
- Installs packages
6 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- delorenj/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- max-sixty/worktrunkedited, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- LuisUrrutia/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 18, 2026
- goern/forgejo-mcpedited, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- benjaminwestern/google-engineer-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 10, 2026
- gmdotdev/skillstheir own version, first seen Feb 25, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- max-sixty/worktrunk★ 12k100% same
- goern/forgejo-mcp★ 15285% same
Wrote their own version · 4
- delorenj/skills★ 17same name
- benjaminwestern/google-engineer-skills★ 5same name
- gmdotdev/skills★ 2same name
- LuisUrrutia/skills★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- agentsview-cliSkill
- clarifySkill
- deslop-biSkill
- eli5Skill
- engram-memSkill
- falsifySkill
- ghSkill
- git-commitSkill
- herdrSkill
- hunk-reviewSkill
- mcp2cliSkill
- opencliSkill
- sembleSkill
- show-meSkill
- tavilySkill
- tmuxSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 66
When a new hook must wait for an existing one, convert the entry to a pipeline.
- Very specific: line 95
Add hook to existing config → reference/hook.md#hook-forms
- Very specific: line 96
Use template variables → reference/hook.md#template-variables
- Very specific: line 97
Add dev server URL to list → reference/config.md#dev-server-url
- Very specific: line 100
Create a wt alias → reference/extending.md#aliases
- Very specific: line 101
Run a command in every worktree → reference/step.md#wt-step-for-each
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Worktrunk
Help users work with Worktrunk, a CLI tool for managing git worktrees.
Available documentation
Reference files are synced from worktrunk.dev documentation:
- reference/config.md: User and project configuration (LLM, hooks, command defaults)
- reference/hook.md: Hook types, timing, and execution order
- reference/switch.md, merge.md, list.md, etc.: Command documentation
- reference/extending.md: Aliases, multi-step pipelines, custom subcommands, and template-expansion gotchas (two-pass
{% raw %}deferral, for-each recipes) - reference/llm-commits.md: LLM commit message generation
- reference/tips-patterns.md: Practical recipes — aliases, per-branch variables, dev server per worktree, parallel agent patterns
- reference/shell-integration.md: Shell integration debugging
- reference/troubleshooting.md: Troubleshooting for LLM and hooks (Claude-specific)
For command-specific options, run wt <command> --help. For configuration, follow the workflows below.
Which worktree a command acts on
wt finds the repository from the working directory, and the worktree from the command's own arguments. Two rules cover every case:
- A command that names a branch already names its worktree. Worktrees are addressed by branch name, so
wt switch <branch>,wt remove <branch>,wt step diff --branch <branch>, andwt config state marker set --branch <branch>act on that branch's worktree no matter which worktree you run them from. Every such argument also accepts the worktree's own path, for the cases a branch cannot name — a second checkout of the same branch, or a detached worktree (whichmarkerstill rejects, since it keys state by branch name). -C <path>moves the working directory, not the worktree selection. Reach for it when the repository lookup is what's wrong: a different repository; a command that acts on the current worktree and takes no branch argument (wt merge,wt step rebase|squash|push— their[TARGET]is the merge target, not a worktree); or a caller whose working directory isn't inside a repository at all, such as an agent hook the host pins elsewhere.
Layering -C on top of a branch argument names the same worktree twice. From inside the alpha worktree of a repo that also has beta:
wt step diff --branch beta # ✓ the branch argument selects the worktree
wt -C ../repo.beta step diff --branch beta # ✗ says beta twice
wt switch --create beta # ✓ --base already defaults to the default branch
wt -C ../repo switch --create beta # ✗ -C adds nothing; you are already in that repoTwo types of configuration
Worktrunk uses two config files with different scopes and permission models:
User config (~/.config/worktrunk/config.toml, never checked into git) holds personal preferences: LLM integration, worktree path templates, command settings, user hooks. Treat it conservatively — propose changes and get consent before editing, never install tools on the user's behalf, and preserve the file's existing structure and comments. See reference/config.md.
Project config (<repo>/.config/wt.toml, checked into git) holds team-wide automation: hooks for the worktree lifecycle (pre-start, pre-merge, etc.). Edit proactively — changes are versioned and reversible via git. Comment why each hook exists, and warn the user before adding destructive commands (rm -rf, DROP TABLE), network fetches piped to shells, or sudo. See reference/hook.md.
Some requests span both: commit-message generation is user config, while the team's quality checks are project config.
Core workflows
Setting up commit message generation (user config)
Detect which tools are installed (which claude codex llm aichat); if none, recommend Claude Code. Take the exact command for the chosen tool from reference/llm-commits.md, propose the [commit.generation] change, and apply it after approval (wt config create first if no config exists). To verify, wt step commit --dry-run renders the prompt, runs the LLM, and prints the message without committing.
Configuring project hooks
Pick the hook type by when the command should run and whether it may block — reference/hook.md maps all ten (5 events × pre/post) to their timing and typical uses.
Derive the commands from the project itself (package.json scripts, Cargo.toml, pyproject.toml) and verify they run before adding them.
When a new hook must wait for an existing one, convert the entry to a pipeline; independent commands in a named table run concurrently:
# Pipeline: install completes before migrate starts
[[pre-start]]
install = "npm install"
[[pre-start]]
migrate = "npm run db:migrate"
# Concurrent: independent commands in one table
[pre-start]
install = "npm install"
env = "cp .env.example .env"Test with wt switch --create test-hooks.
Common tasks reference
User config tasks
- Set up commit message generation →
reference/llm-commits.md - Customize worktree paths →
reference/config.md#worktree-path-template - Custom commit templates →
reference/llm-commits.md#prompt-templates - Configure command defaults →
reference/config.md#command-config - Set up personal hooks →
reference/config.md#user-hooks
Project config tasks
- Set up hooks for new project →
reference/hook.md - Add hook to existing config →
reference/hook.md#hook-forms - Use template variables →
reference/hook.md#template-variables - Add dev server URL to list →
reference/config.md#dev-server-url
Aliases & multi-worktree tasks
- Create a
wtalias →reference/extending.md#aliases - Run a command in every worktree →
reference/step.md#wt-step-for-each - Rebase every worktree (up-style) →
reference/extending.md#recipe-rebase-every-worktree-onto-its-upstream - Pass a template to a nested
wtcommand →reference/extending.md#nesting-templates
Key commands
# View all configuration
wt config show
# Create initial user config (LLM/commit setup: see reference/llm-commits.md)
wt config create
# Full config reference (subcommands, templates, env vars)
wt config --helpHook approvals in non-interactive sessions
Worktrunk never runs a project's hooks or aliases until the user has explicitly approved them. The commands in .config/wt.toml are arbitrary shell code shipped in a repository the user may have just cloned, so on first run Worktrunk shows each command and waits for the user to approve it — an untrusted .config/wt.toml cannot silently execute anything. Approvals are stored per-project in ~/.config/worktrunk/approvals.toml and re-prompted whenever a command template changes, so a hook can't be swapped for a different command after it was approved.
Agents running wt merge, wt switch, or other commands that trigger hooks will hit an error like:
▲ cargo-difftest needs approval to execute 1 command:
○ post-merge install:
cargo install --path .
✗ Cannot prompt for approval in non-interactive environment
↳ To skip prompts in CI/CD, add --yes; to pre-approve commands, run wt config approvals add --yesThe resolution is for the user to make the trust decision themselves:
wt config approvals add— interactive prompt where the user reviews each command before it is stored to~/.config/worktrunk/approvals.toml. Run once per project; the approval persists across invocations until the command template changes or the project moves. This is the path to recommend — the user reviews and consents to exactly the commands that will run.
When invoked as an agent, stop and escalate to the user. Approving a project's hooks is a security decision about whether this repository should be trusted to run arbitrary commands on the user's machine — that decision belongs to the user, not the agent. Tell the user to run wt config approvals add and let them review the commands. Do not reach for either --yes on the user's behalf: on the blocked command it skips the gate for that invocation, and wt config approvals add --yes records every command the project declares with nobody reading them. Both exist for CI/CD pipelines and containers that already control their own hook contents; neither is a shortcut for an interactive agent to silence an approval prompt.
Advanced: agent handoffs
When the user requests spawning a worktree with an agent in a background session ("spawn a worktree for...", "hand off to another agent"), use the tmux or Zellij command from reference/tips-patterns.md#agent-handoffs with the CLI you are running as in place of claude, following that section's note on where a subcommand such as OpenCode's run goes.
Requirements (all must be true):
- User explicitly requests spawning/handoff
- User is in a supported multiplexer (check
$TMUX/$ZELLIJ) - The user's project instructions (
CLAUDE.mdorAGENTS.md) or an explicit prompt authorize this pattern
Do not use this pattern for normal worktree operations.
Parallel sub-Agents (single Claude Code session)
To spawn multiple sub-Agents that each work in their own worktree from one Claude Code session — no terminal multiplexer, no human in the other pane — pre-start each worktree from the parent and pass the path into the sub-Agent prompt:
wt switch --create <branch> --no-cdThen call the Agent tool without isolation: "worktree", naming the path in the prompt:
You are working in `/abs/path/to/myproject.<branch>` on branch `<branch>`.
All edits must stay in that worktree.--no-cd skips the shell-integration cd script the parent can't consume. Add --no-hooks only when no user or project hooks provision the worktree and each sub-Agent does its own build/test step (e.g. cargo run -- hook pre-merge --yes) — a pre-start hook that installs dependencies or links a gitignored build environment hands the sub-Agent a worktree it can't build in when it's skipped. Leaving hooks on needs the project's hook commands already approved: the parent session can't prompt, so an unapproved command in .config/wt.toml aborts the create — see Hook approvals in non-interactive sessions above.
Do not use Agent { isolation: "worktree" } for this. Claude Code passes its internal agent ID as name to the WorktreeCreate hook, so wt creates the worktree as myproject.agent-<id> on a throwaway branch. If the sub-Agent then creates a feature branch on top, you end up with non-canonical paths, orphan branches, and post-start hooks fired against the wrong branch. Pre-creating with wt switch --create keeps path, branch, and hook target aligned.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

