launch
Skill1 starsChanged 4 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when a finished build is about to be shown or shipped, such as demo day, hackathon judging, a portfolio piece, a public launch, a README, or a launch post, or when the user asks how to present, demo, or announce a project.
- Reads credentials
68 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- MJayConstantino/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- microsoft/vscodetheir own version, first seen Nov 12, 2026
- BermanRoman/promt-seo-geotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ADWilkinson/astacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- noah-thing/open-cursortheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecodetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use add-policy, tool-rename-deprecation and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
OpenCortexIDESkilladd-policy
Use when adding, modifying, or reviewing VS Code configuration policies. Covers the full policy lifecycle from registration to export to platform-specific artifacts. Run on ANY change that adds a `policy:` field to a configuration property.
Also in 4 projects that use this
gitpod-ioSkilltool-rename-deprecation
Ensure renamed built-in tool references preserve backward compatibility. Use when renaming a toolReferenceName, tool set referenceName, or any tool identifier. Run on ANY change to tool registration code. Covers legacyToolReferenceFullNames for tools and legacyFullNames for tool sets.
Also in 4 projects that use this
CesarjoquinSkillcompetitors
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'battle card,' or 'competitor teardown.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.
Also in 12 projects that use this
CesarjoquinSkillpaywalls
When the user wants to create or optimize in-app paywalls, upgrade screens, upsell modals, or feature gates. Also use when the user mentions "paywall," "upgrade screen," "upgrade modal," "upsell," "feature gate," "convert free to paid," "freemium conversion," "trial expiration screen," "limit reached screen," "plan upgrade prompt," "in-app pricing," "free users won't upgrade," "trial to paid conversion," or "how do I get users to pay." Use this for any in-product moment where you're asking users to upgrade. Distinct from public pricing pages (see cro) — this focuses on in-product upgrade moments where the user has already experienced value. For pricing decisions, see pricing.
Also in 9 projects that use this
riggyzSkillattribution
Attribution rules for issues, pull requests, work items, reviews, and comments created or edited by the agent in GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps, or similar collaboration systems. Use when creating, commenting on, reviewing, or modifying external tracker content.
Also in 6 projects that use this
coreyhaines31Skillconversion-tracking
Set up, audit, verify, or fix website conversion tracking. Use when the conversion is a form submission, booked meeting, chat, phone call, signup, or purchase; when conversions must reach Google Ads, Meta, GA4, LinkedIn, TikTok, or Microsoft Ads; when the work involves GTM tags and dataLayer events, pixels, the Conversions API (CAPI), Enhanced Conversions, server-side tagging, or gclid and fbclid capture; or when the user reports conversion problems like "conversions stopped", "double counting", "spend but no conversions", "GA4 and Google Ads don't match", or an Unverified or Inactive status. Covers lead gen and ecommerce. Always fire on confirmed success, never the submit click; verify a test conversion arrives; diagnose before changing anything; offer free and native paths alongside paid ones and disclose partner tools. For tracking plans and UTMs, see analytics. For attribution models, see attribution. For campaigns and bidding, see ads. For CRM lead-stage design, see revops.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +4 more from Cesarjoquin
Other versions68 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 68
- microsoft/vscode★ 195ksame name
- coreyhaines31/marketingskills★ 59ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- posit-dev/positron★ 4.3ksame name
- Nexus-JPF/note-companion★ 874same name
- whitecircle/halo★ 851same name
- menkesu/awesome-pm-skills★ 441same name
- NeuralInverse/neuralinverse★ 221same name
- Cesarjoquin/Marketing-Skills★ 190same name
58 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 62 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Start the app clean and walk the core flow in the running app.
- Distinctive: line 51
If a fix may slip, add a fallback line ("works in Chrome.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 62 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Launch
Get a finished build ready for strangers. Make only what the deadline needs; length costs the user time. The user sees only launch work: no process notes, approvals, agent talk or self-review.
1. Readiness check (run it)
Start the app clean and walk the core flow in the running app. List what works and what breaks, with exact errors. Look for leaked keys, crashes under real use (more users, a phone, a cold start) and claims the data can't back.
Per blocker, take the cheapest option: fix (30-45 min max), guard (cap users, hide the button, a "waking up" state), or cut it. Give each fix a visible pass condition, e.g. "a $9 test purchase flips the account to paid, then refund".
2. Pitch line
One sentence: <Product> helps <user> <do job> by <how>, unlike <current alternative>. If it fits a competitor too, it is too generic.
3. Pick the pieces
| Situation | Pieces |
| Live demo, judging | demo script with failure ladder, 3 likely questions with honest answers |
| Repo, portfolio | README, one resume or post line |
| Public launch | README, launch post, metrics |
Get the user's OK on the pitch line and pieces first. Skip roadmaps, risk tables and 90-day plans unless asked.
4. Write the pieces in full
Deliver finished text, never an outline.
Demo script (2-3 min): the problem in one line, then the core flow live (not landing page or login) with exact clicks and inputs, the hard part, the result. Failure ladder, in order: refresh, then seeded or pre-generated data, then hotspot, then a recorded video of every step. If people open it on their own time, keep it awake with an uptime ping or paid tier.
README: pitch line, screenshot, what it does (3-5 bullets), copy-paste run steps, the full .env.example with placeholder values, stack, credits by role, and known limits stated plainly. Run them in a fresh clone.
Launch post: the user's problem, what it does, one proof point that is measured today, a link, one ask. Under 150 words for social. Stagger channels: one per day, the main one first. Read it out loud and cut anything that sounds like an ad.
Metrics (1-3): where to read each, today's baseline, the number that means it worked. Fire each event once and confirm it shows up.
5. Final check
Have a second agent that has not seen the build follow the README and script literally. Fix:
- Broken commands: fails as written.
- False claims: numbers not measured, "users love it", "fast". Replace with what is true, or a bracketed gap the user must fill.
- Invented facts: origin stories, anecdotes, names, features nobody planned. Use
[Your name]and mark hooks "replace with your real story". - Leaked secrets: keys, tokens,
.envvalues, emails, internal URLs, in the pieces and in git history. A leaked key gets rotated, not just deleted.
If a fix may slip, add a fallback line ("works in Chrome; Safari fix coming"). The user runs the demo live once before showing anyone.
After the event
Note what broke and what got asked. Project facts go in the repo's CLAUDE.md, preferences in memory, process changes in this skill.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

