dependency-audit
Skill0 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub
Audit project dependencies - detect package manifests (requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, package.json, pom.xml, build.gradle, *.csproj, vcpkg/conan, Cargo.toml, go.mod …) and report known vulnerabilities, outdated and unpinned versions, missing lock files, unused, duplicate or misplaced dependencies. Never updates anything. Use when asked to check/audit dependencies, packages, libraries, vulnerable or outdated packages, or supply-chain hygiene.
- Installs packages
42 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- petr-korobeinikov/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ymd38/dev-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- northraystudio/marudatheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- amkisko/prayerstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- leek/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use api-audit, container-audit and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
gmanch94Skillapi-audit
Guides a structured API portfolio audit — from discovery through primary-source-verified inventory, shortcomings analysis, prioritized recommendations, executive summary, and options analysis. Enforces primary-source discipline, cross-file consistency, and advisor review gates. Use when auditing an API portfolio, evaluating a vendor's developer ecosystem, or producing defensible technical analysis of an API set.
Also in 3 projects that use this
grichaSkillcontainer-audit
Audit local Docker images and running containers for hardening issues before deploy — privileged flags, root users, stale base images, missing resource limits. Use for pre-deploy container review.
Also in 3 projects that use this
conorluddySkillperformance-profiling
Instruments integration and performance analysis workflows for iOS apps. Use when profiling CPU usage, memory allocation, network activity, or energy consumption. Covers Time Profiler, Allocations, Leaks, Network instruments, and performance optimization strategies.
Also in 3 projects that use this
OpenAISkillthreat-model
Use when Codex is already in the threat-modeling phase of a security scan, the user explicitly invokes $threat-model, or the user explicitly asks to create, update, or persist a repository threat model. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
Also in 4 projects that use this
renfei-designSkilla11y-audit
Audit Figma designs for WCAG accessibility issues — color contrast, minimum font size, touch target sizing, and missing text alternatives. Use when asked to check accessibility, audit contrast ratios, find a11y issues, verify WCAG compliance, or review designs for accessibility problems. Scans nodes, analyzes offline, and annotates issues in Figma.
Also in 3 projects that use this
OpenAISkillsecurity-scan
Use for a standard, single-pass security audit of an entire repository or a scoped path, package, folder, or submodule with no diff to review. This is the default repository scan. Do not use for PR, commit, branch, or working-tree diffs, or for deep, multi-pass scans.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions42 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 42
- web-infra-dev/modern.js★ 5ksame name
- briiirussell/cybersecurity-skills★ 489same name
- Mathews-Tom/armory★ 340same name
- PerryLink/dsh-skill-pack-security★ 22same name
- Indium-AI-Labs/indium-agentkit★ 18same name
- Ionate-Technologies/indium-agentkit★ 17same name
- Quality-Max/free-qa-skills★ 13same name
- jnotsknab/mux-swarm★ 9same name
- greglas75/zuvo★ 7same name
- northraystudio/maruda★ 7same name
32 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibility-auditSkill
- api-design-reviewSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- complexity-checkSkill
- concurrency-reviewSkill
- config-reviewSkill
- cpp-google-styleSkill
- csharp-google-styleSkill
- dead-code-finderSkill
- doc-comment-auditSkill
- error-handling-reviewSkill
- full-reviewSkill
- java-google-styleSkill
- logging-reviewSkill
- markdown-readme-google-styleSkill
- naming-reviewSkill
- owasp-security-reviewSkill
- performance-reviewSkill
- privacy-reviewSkill
- python-google-styleSkill
- regex-reviewSkill
- repo-hygieneSkill
- review-without-fixingSkill
- secrets-scanSkill
- shell-google-styleSkill
- sql-reviewSkill
- test-coverage-reviewSkill
- todo-auditSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 39 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 11
All manifests in the repo unless the user names a subproject.
- Very specific: line 14
Run (no pipe; output is capped): bash <skill-dir>/scripts/audit.sh <project-root>
- Distinctive: line 38
Every finding has a concrete manifest (and line where possible).
- Distinctive: line 41
Do not change any files. Apply changes only when the user explicitly asks for it.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 39 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Dependency audit
Review only: report findings and suggest commands, never install, update, add or remove dependencies yourself. Vulnerability checks contact public advisory databases; mention that, and skip them with OFFLINE=1 if the user doesn't want network access.
Scope
All manifests in the repo unless the user names a subproject. Skip node_modules/, vendor/, .venv/, build output and example/fixture projects inside tests (report them separately if they look shipped).
Steps
- Run (no pipe; output is capped):
bash <skill-dir>/scripts/audit.sh <project-root>- Lists manifests, missing lock files (DP4) and unpinned versions (DP3).
- Runs the audit tools that are installed:
osv-scanner,pip-audit,npm audit/npm outdated,dotnet list package --vulnerable/--outdated,cargo audit,govulncheck,bundle-audit,composer audit. Missing tools are listed with what they would add. Never install them yourself. OFFLINE=1skips all tools that need the network.
- Without tool output for an ecosystem: read the manifest and report versions that are clearly very old or end-of-life only when you are sure; otherwise recommend the matching tool (Maven/Gradle: OWASP
dependency-checkorosv-scanner; C/C++:osv-scanneron vcpkg/conan files, or check versions manually). - DP5 unused: for each declared dependency, grep for its import/package name in the source (
import x,require('x'),from x,using X,#include <x/...>). Remember that package name and import name can differ (beautifulsoup4→bs4,Pillow→PIL,python-dateutil→dateutil). - Report (format below).
Rules
- DP1 error: known vulnerability (CVE/GHSA/OSV ID); severity from the advisory - critical/high = error, moderate = warning, low = info. Note whether a fixed version exists and whether the vulnerable code path is likely used.
- DP2 warning: major version(s) behind or end-of-life; info: minor/patch behind
- DP3 warning: unpinned or floating version in an application (
*,latest, no version,>=without upper bound, MavenLATEST/RELEASE/ranges, Gradle+, NuGet*); libraries may use ranges (info) - DP4 warning: no lock file for an application (
package-lock.json/yarn.lock/pnpm-lock.yaml,poetry.lock/uv.lock/pinned requirements,Cargo.lock,go.sum,Gemfile.lock,composer.lock; vcpkgbuiltin-baseline) - DP5 info: declared but apparently unused - always "possible" (plugins, CLI tools, type stubs, peer deps are used without imports)
- DP6 warning: duplicate or conflicting declarations (same package in several manifests with different versions, in both
dependenciesanddevDependencies) - DP7 warning: dev/test tool in production dependencies (
pytest,jest,eslint,@types/*,junitwithouttestscope) or a runtime package only in dev dependencies - DP8 info: deprecated or unmaintained package (npm deprecation notice, archived repo, no release for years) - only when the tool output or registry says so
- DP9 info: license that may conflict with the project license (GPL/AGPL in a proprietary or MIT project) - only when the license is known
Report
In the user's language, grouped by manifest:
path/to/manifest:line - error|warning|info - <ID> <rule> - <package> <version> - <advisory ID / why it is a problem> - suggestion: <fixed version or command for the user to run>- Every finding has a concrete manifest (and line where possible). DP5 and estimated DP2 findings are "possible".
- Suggest update commands only as text for the user (e.g.
npm install lodash@4.17.21,pip install "requests>=2.32.0"), and mention that major updates can break the build and need testing. - End with a summary: manifests checked, which ecosystems had no tool coverage, findings per severity, then the 3 most important updates to do first.
- Do not change any files. Apply changes only when the user explicitly asks for it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

