commit-message
Skill3 starsChanged 57 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user asks to commit, write a commit message, or stage-and-commit changes. Produces a Conventional Commits message derived from the actual staged diff, never from memory of what was edited.
62 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenImageIOtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- haiderstudio/commit-message-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mab-go/xmind-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- danielvm-git/bigpowerstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- drinkspiller/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- mattiacerutti/supernovatheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use refactor, code-review and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GitHubSkillrefactor
Surgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior. Covers extracting functions, renaming variables, breaking down god functions, improving type safety, eliminating code smells, and applying design patterns. Less drastic than repo-rebuilder; use for gradual improvements.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 7 projects that use this
GoogleSkillgrilling
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
Also in 3 projects that use this
OpenAISkillbrainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillgrill-with-docs
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillskill-creator
Create new agent skills following the Agent Skills specification. Use when asked to "create a skill", "add a new skill", "write a skill", "make a skill", "build a skill", or scaffold a new skill with SKILL.md. Guides through requirements, writing, registration, and verification.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +2 more from google
Other versions62 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 62
- zulip/zulip★ 26ksame name
- mergisi/awesome-openclaw-agents★ 4.1ksame name
- AltraMayor/f3★ 3.4ksame name
- github/copilot-cli-for-beginners★ 2.9ksame name
- AcademySoftwareFoundation/OpenImageIO★ 2.4ksame name
- sheshbabu/zen★ 1.2ksame name
- s-kostyaev/ellama★ 963same name
- tektoncd/operator★ 606same name
- danielvm-git/bigpowers★ 288same name
- rshdhere/vibecheck★ 213same name
52 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- changelogSkill
- claude-md-initSkill
- dependency-auditSkill
- pr-descriptionSkill
- readme-refreshSkill
- secret-auditSkill
- test-gap-finderSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 51 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 8
Write commit messages from evidence (the diff), not from recollection.
- Distinctive: line 11
Run git status --porcelain and git diff --cached --stat.
- Very specific: line 12
Read the staged diff: git diff --cached.
- Distinctive: line 30
Never describe changes that are not in the staged diff.
- Distinctive: line 31
Never include secrets, tokens, or internal URLs in the message.
- Distinctive: line 32
Do not add "Co-Authored-By" or tool attribution unless the repo's CONTRIBUTING or the user asks for it.
- Distinctive: line 33
If tests were not run, do not claim they pass in the message.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 51 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
commit-message
Write commit messages from evidence (the diff), not from recollection.
Procedure
- Run
git status --porcelainandgit diff --cached --stat. If nothing is staged, ask whether to stage all tracked changes (git add -u) or specific paths. Nevergit add -Asilently (untracked junk, secrets). - Read the staged diff:
git diff --cached. If it exceeds ~400 lines, read--statplus the hunks of the 5 largest files. - Classify the change:
feat,fix,refactor,perf,docs,test,build,ci,chore. Pick ONE. If the diff mixes types, say so and offer to split into two commits. - Scope = the top-level directory or module most touched (
auth,api,cli). Omit when the change is cross-cutting. - Subject: imperative, ≤ 50 chars, no trailing period.
fix(auth): reject expired refresh tokens. - Body only when the why is not obvious from the diff: 1 to 3 lines, wrap at 72. Reference issues as
Refs #123/Closes #123on their own line. - Show the message, then commit with a heredoc so newlines survive:
git commit -m "$(cat <<'MSG' fix(auth): reject expired refresh tokens Tokens past `exp` were accepted because the check used `<` instead of `<=`. Closes #412 MSG )" - Print
git log -1 --statas proof.
Rules
- Never describe changes that are not in the staged diff.
- Never include secrets, tokens, or internal URLs in the message.
- Do not add "Co-Authored-By" or tool attribution unless the repo's CONTRIBUTING or the user asks for it.
- If tests were not run, do not claim they pass in the message.
Verify
Maintainers: bash evals/run.sh /tmp/skillkeel-evals commit-message from the plugin root runs this case and grades it; records and transcripts sit in evals/commit-message/.
evals/commit-message/: fixture repo with two new staged Python files; expected: feat subject ≤ 50 chars, imperative, describes only the staged files, no tool trailer, git log -1 --stat shown after the commit.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

