skill-creator
Skill0 starsChanged 39 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when authoring a brand-new skill from scratch - turning a capability idea or a \"make me a skill that…\" request into a complete SKILL.md with a trigger-precise description and the full paid-quality anatomy: procedure, elicitation, thresholds, worked artifact, deliverable, Do NOT, quality bar. Triggers on \"write a new SKILL.md from scratch\", \"turn this capability idea into a complete skill\". Do NOT use to review or grade an existing skill (use skill-auditor), to convert an existing prompt (use prompt-to-skill), or for writing unrelated to skills.
189 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- SebastienDegodez/copilot-instructionstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- idavidov13/agentic-playwrighttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- HughYau/AcademicForgetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Ar9av/obsidian-wikitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- rvdbreemen/OTGW-firmwaretheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- scenario-labs/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use taskflow-inbox-triage, mermaid-diagram-generator and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AtomicBot-aiSkilltaskflow-inbox-triage
Also in 6 projects that use this
shalombSkillmermaid-diagram-generator
Guide on creating and editing Mermaid charts safely. Use when asked to draw a diagram, flowchart, or architecture chart. Triggers on: 'mermaid', 'diagram', 'flowchart', 'visualize'.
Also in 5 projects that use this
naman10parikhSkillecosystem-reference
Quick-access directory of Claude Code ecosystem repos, skills, plugins, MCPs, and patterns. Use when improving the harness.
Also in 5 projects that use this
naman10parikhSkillfractal-delegation
Also in 5 projects that use this
Liang-MHSkillstock_analysis
获取 A 股、基金和港股的实时行情和技术分析数据
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillcommunity-led-growth
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +6 more from naman10parikh
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 189
- moltbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- steipete/warelay★ 394ksame name
- steipete/clawdis★ 394ksame name
- moltbot/moltbot★ 394ksame name
- clawdbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- openclaw/openclaw★ 394ksame name
- molt-bot/clawdbot★ 391ksame name
- anthropics/skills★ 189ksame name
- openai/codex★ 134ksame name
- google-gemini/gemini-cli★ 109ksame name
179 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- skill-auditorSkill
- skill-description-writerSkill
- skill-pack-curatorSkill
- skill-testerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 185 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 26
Check for collisions: Search the catalog (browse_skills) for skills whose triggers could fire on the same request.
- Distinctive: line 44
Do not write the body before the trigger is nailed.
- Distinctive: line 45
Do not ship an essay. If the body has no procedure, no numbers, and no artifact, it does not clear the bar - get the substance or say what …
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not pad: no preamble, no hedging, no restating what the model already knows.
- Distinctive: line 47
Do not ship territory collisions.
- Distinctive: line 48
Do not put dates, versions, or "latest" anywhere in the file.
- Distinctive: line 49
Do not grade existing skills here - that is skill-auditor's job.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 185 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill Creator
Turn a capability idea into a committable SKILL.md that meets the paid-quality bar. The costly mistake this prevents: writing a competent essay about the topic instead of an operating procedure - a skill that reads well and changes nothing about the model's output.
The bar
The skill you write ships only if all of these hold:
- It fires on exactly the right requests and never on the wrong ones. The description front-loads concrete triggers a router can act on with no ambiguity.
- It does not collide with any existing skill. Before writing, check the catalog for trigger overlap and carve clean boundaries into both descriptions.
- Its body carries the full anatomy (skill-author is the canonical standard): framing, ordered procedure, input elicitation, concrete thresholds, at least one worked artifact, an explicit deliverable, a Do NOT section, and a quality bar.
- It is token-disciplined. The description loads every session; the body loads on trigger. Every line is paid for by every installer, every session.
- It is correct and self-contained - real tools, real paths, real practitioner numbers; no hallucinated capabilities; no context it hasn't established.
Operating procedure
- Find the trigger first. Before any body text, answer: what exact request should make this fire? Name concrete signals - task verbs, named artifacts, file types, the phrases a user would actually type. If you cannot name them precisely, the skill is not ready to write; press for the real use case.
- Check for collisions. Search the catalog (browse_skills) for skills whose triggers could fire on the same request. Carve the boundary and write it into both descriptions as negative scope. A new skill that steals a neighbor's territory is a defect.
- Gather the domain substance. Collect the frameworks, thresholds, and templates the skill will encode - from the requester, or from established practitioner methods you name. A skill with no numbers and no artifact is an essay; if the substance is not available yet, say what is missing rather than padding around it.
- Write the description - trigger first. WHAT + WHEN + NOT (skill-description-writer is the canonical standard): open with when to activate, quoting real user phrasing; state what it produces; append "Do NOT use for X - use
<slug>instead" wherever a misfire into a named neighbor is plausible. - Write the body in anatomy order. Framing paragraph (outcome + the mistake prevented), numbered procedure with dependency reasoning, input elicitation with defaults, thresholds with real numbers, worked artifact (filled example, good/bad pair, FILL-field template, or runnable calculator with expected output shown - fenced code blocks are correct here), Deliverable, Do NOT with the why, quality bar, and an escalation boundary where the domain touches legal, medical, or financial ground.
- Set name and slug. Name in Title Case; slug in kebab-case matching the dominant noun. Match the house voice of the existing catalog so the set reads as one author.
- Self-check, then hand to skill-auditor. Re-read the description cold: fires on the right request, silent on a near-miss? Re-read the body: could a practitioner execute without a clarifying question? Is there an artifact they could copy out and use as-is? Then state the skill is ready for a skill-auditor pass before publishing.
Deliverable
A single committable SKILL.md - valid frontmatter (name, description) plus the full-anatomy body - at the correct slug/SKILL.md path. No commentary baked into the file.
Do NOT
- Do not write the body before the trigger is nailed. A vague trigger produces a skill that never fires or always fires, however good the body.
- Do not ship an essay. If the body has no procedure, no numbers, and no artifact, it does not clear the bar - get the substance or say what is missing.
- Do not pad: no preamble, no hedging, no restating what the model already knows. If a line does not change behavior, cut it.
- Do not ship territory collisions; fix the boundary in both descriptions before delivering.
- Do not put dates, versions, or "latest" anywhere in the file.
- Do not grade existing skills here - that is skill-auditor's job; hand off rather than absorbing its scope.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

