agentleFS
SkillMedevSkillMedev/seo-organic-growth/skills/aeo-answer-blockifier/SKILL.md

aeo-answer-blockifier

Skill0 starsChanged 40 days agoMITView on GitHub

Rewrites a section or page into concise, self-contained answer blocks that AI answer engines and search snippets can lift and cite verbatim. Use when restructuring a blog post, FAQ, docs page, or landing copy to win a featured snippet or get quoted by AI Overviews, ChatGPT, or Perplexity, or when a draft buries its answer in setup. Do NOT use for keyword research, full-article drafting, or technical/crawlability SEO - use a dedicated SEO or copywriting skill instead.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Verify against the quality bar: before returning.

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    Every factual claim is specific and verifiable, none fabricated.

    line 32
  3. Distinctive:

    No throat-clearing intro precedes the answer.

    line 33
  4. Distinctive:

    Do NOT bury the answer behind setup, background, or a "in this post we'll cover" intro.

    line 37
  5. Distinctive:

    Do NOT leave pronouns or "as above" references that break when the block is quoted alone.

    line 38
  6. Distinctive:

    Do NOT force every heading into a question when the wording becomes unnatural.

    line 39
  7. Distinctive:

    Do NOT fabricate stats, dates, or sources to look citable - readers and engines punish inaccuracy.

    line 40
  8. Distinctive:

    Do NOT strip genuine caveats or accuracy hedges.

    line 41
  9. Distinctive:

    Do NOT promise snippet or citation wins as guaranteed.

    line 42

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

AEO Answer Blockifier

Restructure existing content into question-led blocks an engine can quote out of context, so the page earns citations and snippets instead of just ranking.

Workflow

  1. Extract the questions. List every distinct question the section actually answers, in the user's natural wording (including conversational and voice phrasing). One block per question. If a passage answers no clear question, either reframe it as one or drop it from blockification.
  2. Set the heading to the question. Make each H2/H3 the exact question, matching how a user would type or speak it. This maps the block to the query and mirrors People Also Ask.
  3. Lead with the answer. State the direct answer in the first one or two sentences under the heading - conclusion first, before any setup. Supporting detail, nuance, and caveats follow. An answer buried in paragraph three forfeits the citation; extraction overwhelmingly favors the first 1-2 sentences after the heading.
  4. Make the block self-contained. Name the subject explicitly in the answer sentence. Remove "as mentioned above," "this," and any pronoun or reference pointing offscreen, so the block reads correctly when lifted alone.
  5. Pick the format the question demands. "How to" / "steps" → numbered list. "Best" / "types of" → bulleted list. "What is" → one tight definition paragraph. Comparison → a table. Forcing prose onto a list-shaped query loses the extraction.
  6. Size the block to the format. Definition/paragraph answer: roughly 40-60 words (featured snippets typically truncate near 300 characters, so the complete answer must land before that cutoff). List: 3-8 scannable items, one idea each, under ~10 words per item where possible. Table: labeled columns, no prose padding in cells.
  7. Add verifiable trust signals. Where the answer makes a factual claim, attach a concrete number, named source, or first-hand specific an engine can check (this is what E-E-A-T rewards). Replace generic unsourced assertions with verifiable ones.
  8. Verify against the quality bar before returning.

Deliverable

Produce the rewritten content as an ordered set of answer blocks, each containing: the question-phrased heading (H2/H3), the answer-first body in the format the question demands (sized per step 6), and any trust signals inline. Alongside the rewrite, include a one-line change log per block noting what was restructured (e.g. "answer moved from paragraph 3 to sentence 1," "prose converted to numbered list") so the author can review the edits without a diff.

Quality bar

A block ships only if all hold:

  • The heading is the user's question; the first sentence answers it directly.
  • The block reads correctly quoted in isolation - no offscreen references, subject named.
  • The format matches the question type, sized as in step 6.
  • Every factual claim is specific and verifiable, none fabricated.
  • No throat-clearing intro precedes the answer.

Do NOT

  • Do NOT bury the answer behind setup, background, or a "in this post we'll cover" intro.
  • Do NOT leave pronouns or "as above" references that break when the block is quoted alone.
  • Do NOT force every heading into a question when the wording becomes unnatural.
  • Do NOT fabricate stats, dates, or sources to look citable - readers and engines punish inaccuracy.
  • Do NOT strip genuine caveats or accuracy hedges; precise factual qualification builds trust. Cut only filler, not correctness.
  • Do NOT promise snippet or citation wins as guaranteed; they fluctuate. Optimize structure, treat placement as upside.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.