agentleFS
SkillMedevSkillMedev/personal-finance-mastery/skills/big-purchase-decision/SKILL.md

big-purchase-decision

Skill0 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub

Evaluates a major purchase with total cost of ownership, opportunity cost, affordability red lines, and a cooling-off rule, producing a scored buy/wait/walk verdict. Use when someone asks "should I buy this car", "can I afford this", "is this purchase a good idea", or is about to finance anything with a monthly payment. Do NOT use for fitting an approved purchase into the monthly plan - use budget-builder instead; for whether the purchase should outrank debt payoff or savings - use financial-planner; for home-purchase retirement trade-offs - use retirement-projection.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not evaluate on sticker price or monthly payment.

    line 94
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not let a strong "want" override a failed red line - the red lines exist for exactly that moment.

    line 95
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not extend the loan term to make the payment fit.

    line 96
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not skip the 30-day rule because a sale ends soon.

    line 97
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not use invented ownership costs.

    line 98
  6. Distinctive:

    All four red lines have explicit YES/NO answers.

    line 104

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Big Purchase Decision

Big purchases feel like one-time decisions but are almost always multi-year financial commitments. The costly mistake this skill prevents is deciding on sticker price and monthly payment - the two numbers sellers control - instead of total cost, opportunity cost, and affordability. Analyze before signing, because afterward the analysis is just regret.

Operating procedure

Step 1: Confirm the purchase clears the threshold

Apply the full framework to any single purchase above 1% of annual take-home income (for most households, $500-$1,500). Two lighter rules cover everything below it:

  • Below the 1% threshold but still discretionary and unplanned: apply the 24-hour rule - sleep on it once. Most impulse purchases do not survive one night.
  • A useful ceiling for guilt-free discretionary buys: anything under 1% of net worth rarely warrants analysis for households with positive net worth; above that, it does.

Non-urgent purchases above the 1%-of-income threshold get the 30-day rule: wait 30 days before buying. Most impulse-driven desires fade within that window; a desire still strong at day 30 that also passes the financial tests below is a considered want, not an impulse.

Step 2: Gather inputs

  1. Purchase price and how it would be paid (cash, financing terms, APR).
  2. Annual take-home income and current monthly surplus (from budget-builder if one exists).
  3. Ownership costs: insurance change, maintenance, fuel/consumables, registration or subscription fees, expected useful life. Label estimates as estimates.
  4. Emergency fund status and any debt above 7-8% APR - both are gate conditions in Step 5.

Step 3: Compute total cost of ownership

TCO = price + financing interest + (annual insurance delta + maintenance + consumables + fees) × years of useful life. Divide by useful life for true annual cost. A $25,000 vehicle typically lands at $8,000-$12,000 per year once interest, insurance, fuel, maintenance, and depreciation are loaded - three to four times what the sticker suggests.

Step 4: Compute opportunity cost

At a 7% average annual real return, $10,000 invested today is worth approximately $19,700 in 10 years and $38,700 in 20 years. Scale linearly for the purchase amount and state it plainly: "this $30,000 purchase is ~$59,000 of retirement money in 10 years." This is not a reason to never spend - it is the honest price tag for the trade-off.

Step 5: Apply the affordability red lines

Any single "no" here is a walk or wait, regardless of desire:

  • Buying it would drop the emergency fund below the starter month (emergency-fund-planner).
  • The user carries debt above 7-8% APR and the purchase is discretionary.
  • Financed: total monthly debt payments including the new one would push debt-to-income above 36% of gross income (above 43% is the hard red line lenders use).
  • The monthly ownership cost (TCO ÷ 12 per year of life) exceeds the current monthly surplus.

Step 6: Evaluate the financing

Cash is preferable for discretionary purchases. If financing, the APR is the decision number, not the monthly payment - a lower payment achieved by stretching the term means paying more in total; compute total interest over the full term and add it to TCO. A payment made "affordable" only by a 72- or 84-month term is a red-line signal in itself.

Step 7: Time and negotiate

Where timing is flexible: end of month, holiday weekends for appliances and vehicles, and end of model-year cycles consistently price better. Research fair-market value before negotiating - it is the single most effective way to avoid overpaying.

Step 8: Fill the scorecard and give the verdict

Purchase decision scorecard

Copy and fill. Verdict rule: any red line failed = WALK/WAIT; all red lines passed and score ≥ 4 of 5 = BUY; 3 = WAIT 30 days and re-score.

PURCHASE SCORECARD - [FILL: item] - [FILL: date]
Price: $[FILL]   Payment method: [FILL: cash / financed at [FILL]% APR, [FILL] months]

TCO: $[FILL] over [FILL] years = $[FILL]/year ($[FILL]/month)
Opportunity cost: $[FILL] ≈ $[FILL] in 10 years at 7% real

RED LINES (any NO = walk/wait)
  Emergency fund stays above starter month:      YES / NO
  No high-interest (>7-8% APR) debt outstanding: YES / NO
  DTI with new payment stays under 36%:          YES / NO
  Monthly TCO fits current surplus:              YES / NO

SCORE (1 point each)
  [ ] Survived the 30-day rule
  [ ] Paying cash, or APR under [FILL: best available rate]
  [ ] TCO researched from real quotes, not guesses
  [ ] Fair-market value researched; negotiation planned
  [ ] Still needed if income dropped 20% next year

VERDICT: BUY / WAIT 30 DAYS / WALK - because [FILL: one sentence]

Worked example

Used SUV, $25,000, financed $20,000 at 8.5% for 60 months. TCO: $25,000 + $4,600 interest + ($1,400 insurance delta + $1,200 maintenance + $2,200 fuel + $300 fees) × 6 years = $50,200 → $8,370/year, ~$700/month - inside the $8,000-$12,000 band. Opportunity cost of the $5,000 down payment: ~$9,850 in 10 years. Red lines: emergency fund holds (YES), no card debt (YES), DTI rises to 31% (YES), $700/month vs $900 surplus (YES). Score: 30-day rule passed, APR beats the local credit-union alternative - no; quotes real - yes; FMV researched - yes; survives income drop - yes. Score 4/5, all red lines pass: BUY, negotiating at month-end against the researched FMV.

Deliverable

Produce a completed scorecard: TCO with the per-year and per-month figures, the 10-year opportunity cost, all four red lines answered, the 5-point score, and a one-sentence verdict the user could read back in a year without wincing.

Do NOT

  • Do not evaluate on sticker price or monthly payment; both hide the real cost.
  • Do not let a strong "want" override a failed red line - the red lines exist for exactly that moment.
  • Do not extend the loan term to make the payment fit; compute what the extension costs in total interest.
  • Do not skip the 30-day rule because a sale ends soon; recurring sales are a sales tactic, not a deadline.
  • Do not use invented ownership costs; get an insurance quote and typical maintenance figures, or label the TCO provisional.

Quality bar

  • TCO includes financing interest and at least four ownership cost categories, each sourced or flagged as an estimate.
  • The opportunity cost is stated in dollars at 10 years, not as an abstract principle.
  • All four red lines have explicit YES/NO answers.
  • The verdict follows mechanically from the red lines and score - no override without a written reason.

Escalation

This is general financial education, not individualized financial advice. For real estate, business equipment, or complex financing, a financial advisor or accountant should model the full impact including tax implications (route tax questions to tax-optimization); route the question of whether this purchase belongs in the plan at all to financial-planner.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.