job-description-writer
Skill0 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub
Draft an inclusive, role-relevant, level-calibrated job posting from a hiring manager's role brief. Use when an employer is writing or revising a job description, JD, or job posting - you have a role brief, leveling rubric, or comp band and need outcome-based requirements, plain compensation/logistics, and inclusive tone. Do NOT use when tailoring a candidate's resume or cover letter to a posting - use job-application instead.
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jaskirat1616/grok-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- osamabinjannat/remote-hiring-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- JayRHa/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- edu6565/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- poorvith-mp/skills-businesstheir own version, first seen Aug 19, 2026
- Uhudsavasindankacanokcu2/recruiting-skills-for-claudetheir own version, first seen Jun 18, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- jaskirat1616/grok-skills★ 22same name
- JayRHa/agent-skills★ 12same name
- JayRHa/AgentSkills★ 12same name
- Uhudsavasindankacanokcu2/recruiting-skills-for-claude★ 3same name
- osamabinjannat/remote-hiring-skills★ 1same name
- poorvith-mp/skills-business★ 1same name
- edu6565/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Write 4-6 outcome statements, not task lists.
- Distinctive: line 27
Every must-have is defensibly job-related and consistent with the stated level.
- Distinctive: line 31
No requirement infers or implies a preference about age, gender, family status, disability, or national origin.
- Distinctive: line 35
Do not write a wish list of every skill the team admires.
- Distinctive: line 36
Do not gate on years of experience or set any maximum, and do not use proxy credentials in place of the underlying competency.
- Distinctive: line 37
Do not invent or estimate a pay range, or assert legal compliance - flag and route comp and EEO language to their owners.
- Distinctive: line 38
Do not write the candidate's resume, cover letter, or application materials.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Job Description Writer
Turn an employer's role brief into a posting a strong candidate reads to the end and a fair process can be built on. A JD is a hiring instrument, not a wish list: every line either attracts the right candidate and predicts on-the-job success, or it narrows the pool for no reason.
Workflow
- Confirm the role brief and level. Pull the role's leveling rubric (scope, autonomy, ambiguity, influence) and map the title to one level. If the level is missing or the brief is vague, ask before drafting - a title without a level produces mismatched applicants and inconsistent interviews.
- Write 4-6 outcome statements, not task lists. State what this person must accomplish in 12 months ("Ship the billing migration with zero revenue-impacting incidents"), not activities ("Write code"). Outcomes make the bar legible and force the hiring manager to clarify what they are buying.
- Separate must-haves from bonus. Cap must-haves at 5-7 and include only what is genuinely needed on day one. Move everything else to "bonus." Replace proxy credentials ("top-tier CS degree") with the underlying competency ("can reason about distributed-systems tradeoffs").
- State experience as a signal, not a gate. Frame years of experience as a soft signal, never a hard requirement. Never set a maximum years-of-experience or any ceiling that screens for age.
- State compensation and logistics plainly. Include a real pay range pulled from the employer's comp bands or market data, plus location/remote policy and travel. A posted range whose top is more than roughly 50% above its bottom reads as evasive and depresses applications; if the honest band is that wide, the role is probably spanning two levels - split it or narrow it. Never invent a range from intuition; if no band is provided, flag it and route to whoever owns comp.
- Set human, inclusive tone. Use plain second-person language. Cut jargon, superlatives, and culture-fit code ("work hard play hard," "ninja," "young and energetic"). State concrete inclusion and accommodation commitments. Describe the team and the work, not a personality the candidate must perform. Keep the whole posting in the 300-700 word range - long enough to be concrete, short enough that candidates read to the compensation line.
- Hand off for ownership. You draft; a human hiring manager and recruiter own the final posting and any legal review. Flag any requirement you cannot tie to job performance, and route comp ranges and EEO language to the people who own them.
Deliverable
Produce a ready-to-review posting containing: title mapped to one named level, a 2-3 sentence role summary, 4-6 twelve-month outcome statements, must-haves (5-7 max) separated from bonus qualifications, the sourced pay range and location/remote/travel logistics, the inclusion and accommodation statement, and a handoff note listing anything flagged for the comp owner, recruiter, or legal review.
Quality bar
- Every must-have is defensibly job-related and consistent with the stated level.
- Outcomes outnumber raw task lists; the 12-month bar is concrete and measurable.
- A real, sourced pay range and explicit location/remote policy are present (or explicitly flagged as missing and routed).
- Tone is plain second person with no jargon, superlatives, or culture-fit code; inclusion and accommodation commitments are concrete.
- No requirement infers or implies a preference about age, gender, family status, disability, or national origin.
Do NOT
- Do not write a wish list of every skill the team admires; each must-have shrinks the pool, disproportionately for candidates who self-select out.
- Do not gate on years of experience or set any maximum, and do not use proxy credentials in place of the underlying competency.
- Do not invent or estimate a pay range, or assert legal compliance - flag and route comp and EEO language to their owners.
- Do not write the candidate's resume, cover letter, or application materials; that is the candidate side - use job-application instead.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

