term-sheet-negotiation
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when a founder has or expects a term sheet and needs to negotiate. Triggers on "negotiate my term sheet", "is this term sheet fair", "liquidation preference", "board seats", "protective provisions", "how to negotiate valuation", "I have multiple offers", "what terms matter". Focuses leverage on the terms that change value and control.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- cap-table-managerSkill
- data-room-builderSkill
- due-diligence-checklistSkill
- financial-plannerSkill
- fundraise-closing-mechanicsSkill
- fundraise-readiness-auditSkill
- fundraise-team-hiringSkill
- fundraising-narrativeSkill
- fundraising-stage-selectorSkill
- investor-pipeline-crmSkill
- investor-targetingSkill
- investor-update-writerSkill
- market-sizingSkill
- pitch-deck-builderSkill
- pitch-practice-coachSkill
- safe-vs-priced-roundSkill
- series-a-readinessSkill
- term-sheet-explainerSkill
- vc-pitch-emailSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Use it the moment a term sheet is in hand or imminent, with the pipeline still warm from [[investor-pipeline-crm]].
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Term Sheet Negotiation
Founders over-negotiate valuation and under-negotiate the terms that quietly decide who gets paid and who controls the company. A high valuation wrapped in bad terms is worse than a fair valuation with clean ones. This skill puts the leverage where it matters.
When to use this skill
Use it the moment a term sheet is in hand or imminent, with the pipeline still warm from [[investor-pipeline-crm]]. Understand each clause first with [[term-sheet-explainer]]; model the ownership impact in [[cap-table-manager]].
Leverage comes from the process, not the table
- The strongest lever is a real second option. A batched raise ([[investor-pipeline-crm]]) that produces competing interest does more than any clever counter.
- Leverage decays after you sign. The signed term sheet usually includes exclusivity (no-shop); once signed, your alternatives are gone, so negotiate hard before signing.
- Get a startup lawyer who sees these daily. The cost is trivial against the value of one fixed term.
The terms that change VALUE
- Liquidation preference: 1x non-participating is standard and founder-fair. Resist participating preferred ("double dip") and multiples above 1x - they pay investors twice and can gut founder/employee proceeds in a modest exit.
- Option pool: a pool carved from pre-money is founder dilution disguised as a number. Size it to the real hiring plan ([[fundraise-team-hiring]]), not a default 15-20%.
- Anti-dilution: accept broad-based weighted-average; refuse full-ratchet, which punishes you brutally in a down round.
- Pro-rata rights: standard for lead investors; reasonable to grant.
The terms that change CONTROL
- Board composition: at seed, keep founder control or a balanced founder/investor/independent structure. A board you lose by Series A is hard to win back.
- Protective provisions: investor veto rights over certain actions. Normal to grant some; keep the list narrow and tied to genuinely major decisions.
- Founder vesting: investors often re-set or extend it. Negotiate credit for time already served.
How to negotiate
- Pick your three priorities; concede the rest gracefully. Fighting every line signals inexperience and sours the relationship you are about to depend on.
- Trade, don't just push: give on something they value (e.g. pro-rata) to win what you value (e.g. 1x non-participating).
- Anchor on standards. "Market standard at this stage is X" is your most powerful phrase, and it is usually true.
- Remember you will work with this partner for years. Negotiate firmly and cleanly; do not scorch the ground you have to stand on.
Anti-patterns
- Maximizing valuation while waving through participating preferred or a founder-funded pool.
- Signing a no-shop before you have negotiated, killing your own leverage.
- Negotiating without a lawyer or a comparable benchmark.
- Treating it as a war instead of the start of a long relationship.
Deliverable
A marked-up term sheet: each material term flagged standard / negotiate / walk, your top-three priorities, the trades you will offer, the ownership-and-control impact modeled, and the script for countering the two or three worst terms.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

