agentleFS
SkillMedevSkillMedev/database-performance/skills/n-plus-one-hunter/SKILL.md

n-plus-one-hunter

Skill0 starsChanged 39 days agoMITView on GitHub

Detect ORM loop-of-queries (N+1) patterns from query logs and eliminate them with batched eager loading, keeping the N+1s that are cheap. Use when a list endpoint is slow, a request issues many near-identical SELECTs differing only by an id, query logs show repeated SELECTs in a loop, or a tool like the bullet gem flags an N+1 in ActiveRecord, Prisma, SQLAlchemy, or Hibernate.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use counts, not rows, for sizes.

    line 19
  2. Very specific:

    Every fix is justified by a captured query log or pg_stat_statements count, before and after.

    line 28
  3. Distinctive:

    Only N+1s on hot paths or scaling with user-controlled input are touched.

    line 31
  4. Very specific:

    Do not optimize by guesswork - never "fix" an N+1 you have not seen in a log or pg_stat_statements.

    line 35
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not preload associations the response never serializes.

    line 36
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not chase a 2-query "N+1" or one on a page rendered once a day.

    line 37
  7. Very specific:

    Do not use joinedload/eager_load on one-to-many collections by default - the row fan-out can regress latency.

    line 38
  8. Very specific:

    Do not set FetchType.EAGER globally in Hibernate to "solve" N+1.

    line 39
  9. Distinctive:

    Do not skip per-row loads that hit an identity map or cache where the marginal cost is already near zero.

    line 40

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

N+1 Query Hunter

Find ORM N+1 patterns from captured query logs and replace them with batched eager loading, leaving cheap bounded ones alone. An N+1 is one query to fetch a list, then one more query per row to fetch its association - the most common ORM performance bug, hidden because each query is individually fast.

Do NOT use when reading or interpreting a single statement's EXPLAIN/EXPLAIN ANALYZE plan - use explain-plan-reader instead. Do NOT use when the fix is restructuring one query's SQL (rewriting joins, subqueries, or window functions) - use query-rewriter instead. This skill owns the loop-of-queries case where the fix is preloading, not rewriting one statement.

Workflow

  1. Capture the evidence before guessing. Turn on query logging and count the SELECTs for the slow request. ActiveRecord: tail the log or add the bullet gem. SQLAlchemy: create_engine(..., echo='debug'). Prisma: enable the query log event. Hibernate: hibernate.show_sql=true and generate_statistics=true. The tell is a burst of near-identical SELECTs differing only in the WHERE id = ? value, scaling with collection size - 20+ of them in one request is a near-certain N+1. Confirm server-side with pg_stat_statements: a normalized query whose calls count is orders of magnitude above the endpoint's request rate.
  2. Confirm it scales with input, and that it's worth fixing. Note how N grows: with collection size, page size, or user-controlled input. A useful bar: fix it when the request issues 10+ queries that grow linearly with rows, or when the loop's aggregate time is 20%+ of request latency - each query may cost only 0.5-1ms, but 200 of them adds 100-200ms plus per-query round-trip overhead. A 2-query "N+1" or one bounded to a handful of rows is not the target - move on.
  3. Replace lazy per-row loads with one batched preload. ActiveRecord: Post.includes(:author, comments: :user) - preload forces separate batched queries, eager_load forces a LEFT JOIN, includes lets Rails choose. SQLAlchemy: selectinload(Post.comments) (second IN query, best default for collections) or joinedload for one-to-one. Prisma: pass include/select with nested relations in one call. Hibernate: JOIN FETCH in JPQL or an @EntityGraph; never rely on global FetchType.EAGER. If a batched IN list can exceed roughly 1,000 ids, chunk it - huge IN lists degrade planning and can hit protocol parameter limits.
  4. Avoid the fan-out trap. joinedload/eager_load on a one-to-many multiplies rows (cartesian fan-out) and can be slower than the N+1 it replaced - prefer selectinload/preload for collections. Eager loading inside a method that is itself called in a loop just moves the N+1 up one level; hoist the preload to the outermost collection.
  5. Use counts, not rows, for sizes. If the code loads children only to call .size/.count, use counter_cache or a grouped COUNT instead of materializing the association.
  6. Re-measure. Re-run the request with logging on and confirm the SELECT count dropped to a constant, and that p95 latency improved on the hot path.

Deliverable

Produce an N+1 fix report containing: the before evidence (query count and latency for the request, or the pg_stat_statements calls count), each offending call site with the preload change applied, the after query count (a constant, independent of collection size), the before/after p95 on the hot path, and a short list of N+1s deliberately left alone with the reason (bounded, cached, or cold path).

Quality bar

  • Every fix is justified by a captured query log or pg_stat_statements count, before and after.
  • The chosen strategy matches cardinality: IN-batched (selectinload/preload) for collections, JOIN-based only for one-to-one.
  • The request issues a constant number of queries regardless of collection size.
  • Only N+1s on hot paths or scaling with user-controlled input are touched.

Do NOT

  • Do not optimize by guesswork - never "fix" an N+1 you have not seen in a log or pg_stat_statements.
  • Do not preload associations the response never serializes; that is a reverse-N+1 fetching unused data.
  • Do not chase a 2-query "N+1" or one on a page rendered once a day.
  • Do not use joinedload/eager_load on one-to-many collections by default - the row fan-out can regress latency.
  • Do not set FetchType.EAGER globally in Hibernate to "solve" N+1; scope eager loading per query.
  • Do not skip per-row loads that hit an identity map or cache where the marginal cost is already near zero.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.