agentleFS
Shreyash3007Shreyash3007/aegis/skills/02-architect/skill.md

02-architect

Skill0 starsChanged 29 days agoMITView on GitHub

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Every structural claim must be checkable against aegis ast build output later.

    line 28

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
skill.md

SKILL-02: ARCHITECT (Master Skill)

Purpose

Turn a frozen scope into a frozen architecture: system design, database, security - the three documents every later skill trusts.

Sub-Skills

IDFilePurposeGate
02a02a-system-design.mdSystem architecture + ADRsSACRED G1: arch freeze
02b02b-database.mdSchema, migrations, API contractsdestructive-migration review
02c02c-security.mdSTRIDE/OWASP threat modelSACRED G2: security sign-off

Shared Rules

  1. Contracts are CODE, not prose: TS interfaces, stub exports, OpenAPI, numbered migrations. They merge to the base branch BEFORE any slice (N1).
  2. Every structural claim must be checkable against aegis ast build output later. No architecture the graph can't verify.
  3. Anti-fragility: DAG only (the CLI detects cycles, exit 8), no God Objects, explicit over implicit, fail-safe defaults.

Routing

01c -> 02a -> [SACRED G1] -> 02b -> 02c -> [SACRED G2] -> 03a

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.