artifact-plan
Skill1 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub
Tracks a large task on a live plan board (an artifact showing the tasks, their order, and what blocks what) instead of a markdown plan file. Use when a request splits into 3 or more tasks with dependencies between them, when the orchestrate skill splits work across sessions, or when the user says "plan this", "track this", "make a plan board". Offers the board first and builds it only on a yes. Also use whenever this session orchestrates work tracked on a plan board: a child's report, approach note or question about a `Plan task:` id, deciding what to write to the board, and resuming after a restart.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- olakunlevpn/olakunlevpn-artifact-skillstheir own version, first seen May 11, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- olakunlevpn/olakunlevpn-artifact-skills★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.
- cloud-local-bridgeSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- orchestrator-wikiSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 10 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
10
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 32
Ask with AskUserQuestion, one question:
- Distinctive: line 42
Write the tasks before publishing anything.
- Very specific: line 63
Write the tasks to a JSON list and run python3 <skill dir>/scripts/validate_plan.py tasks.json.
- Very specific: line 105
Leave out Built on for a wave-1 task.
- Very specific: line 109
Do not start a task whose blockers aren't done, even if a session is idle.
- Very specific: line 144
Every write also sets updatedAt and adds a log/e<n> entry, one sentence.
- Very specific: line 148
If the plan changes (a task splits, a new dependency shows up), rerun the validator on the new list, then update tasks and blockedBy in one …
- Very specific: line 154
After a restart or a context compaction, the board is the source of truth, not your memory.
- Very specific: line 155
If this session keeps an orchestrator wiki, resume it first (orchestrator-wiki step 4).
- Very specific: line 157
Read plan/meta, every tasks doc and the last 20 log entries.
- Very specific: line 164
When every task is done, add a final log entry, tell the user in one line with the link, and leave the board as the record.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Artifact plan
One plan board per large task. The orchestrator (the session the user talks to) creates it, is
the only writer, and updates it as implementation agents report. Agents never touch it.
The page is tracker.html in this skill's directory; the data lives in the board's database, so
updates are database writes, never republishes. scripts/validate_plan.py checks the task graph.
1. Detect
Offer a plan board when all of these hold:
- the work splits into 3 or more tasks that can each be finished and checked on their own;
- at least one task depends on another (needs its output, or touches the same files after it);
- it will run across several sessions or agents, or take more than about an hour.
Below that, just do the work. Never offer twice in one session after a "no".
2. Offer
Ask with AskUserQuestion, one question:
This splits into N tasks, and K of them wait on others. Track it on a plan board?
Options: Track it on a plan board (Recommended) and Just start. On "Just start", go on
without one. If the Artifact tool or ArtifactData isn't available in this session, say so in one
line and go on without one.
3. Build the task graph
Write the tasks before publishing anything. Each task has:
| field | meaning |
id | T1, T2, ... (the doc id), stable for the life of the plan |
title | what gets built, in the user's words, under 40 characters |
order | tie-break inside a wave (lower first) |
blockedBy | ids that must be done first; [] when it can start now |
doneWhen | the observable result, e.g. "PR open, CI green, /settings renders" |
details | scope: the files and areas in scope, and those off limits |
status | todo, in_progress, review, done or failed |
owner | the child session's title, once started |
approach | the approach the orchestrator approved, in a line or two (step 6) |
evidence | what the orchestrator checked before marking done (step 6) |
branch, pr, note, updatedAt | filled in as reports come in |
Rules: no cycles. Two tasks that touch the same files are either one task or chained with
blockedBy. Never store ready or waiting: the page derives them (a todo task is ready when
every blocker is done) and draws the waves from blockedBy. Clicking a task, in the list or the
graph, expands it to show every field plus its blockers' and dependents' statuses.
Write the tasks to a JSON list and run python3 <skill dir>/scripts/validate_plan.py tasks.json.
Fix every problem it prints (cycles, unknown or duplicate ids, missing title or doneWhen)
before going on. Then show the user the list (id, title, blocked by) and confirm the split, as
orchestrate step 1 does.
4. Publish and seed
- Publish
tracker.htmlfrom this skill's directory with the Artifact tool, a new file path per plan (copy it to the scratchpad asplan-<slug>.html),icon=checklist, andcapabilities={"db": {"rules": [{"path": "plan", "read": "view", "write": "owner"}, {"path": "tasks", "read": "view", "write": "owner"}, {"path": "log", "read": "view", "write": "owner"}]}}. Only the owner writes; anyone it's shared with can only read. - Seed it with one
ArtifactDatabatch:plan/meta:{goal, orchestrator}(goal = the user's ask in one line, orchestrator = this session's title).tasks/<id>for every task, alltodo.log/e1:{at: <ISO time>, text: "Plan created with N tasks."}.
- Give the user the link, and put it in your table of running sessions so a resumed orchestrator
can find it. If this session keeps an orchestrator wiki, add the board's
{title, url}to itswiki/metaboards(orchestrator-wikistep 3). The board stays its own artifact; the wiki only links it.
5. Dispatch from the board
The board decides what starts. Start tasks whose blockers are all done, wave 1 first, using the
orchestrate skill's step 4, with at most 3 to 5 running at once even when more are unblocked;
start the next one as a slot frees. Each child's brief carries, from the task:
Plan task: <id>. <title>
Objective: <one or two sentences on what and why>
Done when: <doneWhen>
In scope: <files and areas from details>. Off limits: <files and areas other tasks own>.
Built on: <one line per done blocker: id, PR, and its evidence, e.g. "T1: PR #12 merged,
settings table in db/schema.sql">. Build on these as they are; ask before changing them.
Approach first: before writing code, send the orchestrator the files you'll touch and the
interfaces you'll create or use, in a few lines, then wait for "go" or "adjust".
Report to the orchestrator when you start, when a PR is open, when you are blocked (say on
what), and when Done when is met. Each report: status, PR link, branch, and one or two lines.
Never edit the plan board.Leave out Built on for a wave-1 task. Approach first is required for a task that unblocks
others, since a wrong interface there breaks every dependent; for a leaf task, drop the line
unless the task is large or vague.
Do not start a task whose blockers aren't done, even if a session is idle. If the user wants it
started anyway, set it going and add a note saying it started early.
6. Update on every report
Each child report becomes one ArtifactData batch, pinned with the if_version you last read:
| report | write to tasks/<id> |
| child started | status: in_progress, owner, branch |
| approach note | check it (below), reply, then approach = what you approved |
| PR open | status: review, pr |
| blocked on a decision | keep status, note = the question |
| Done when met | verify first (below), then status: done, evidence |
| failed or abandoned | status: failed, note = why |
Check the approach. Compare the note with the task's details (in scope, off limits), its
doneWhen, the Built on outputs it must use, and what its dependents will need from it. Reply
"go" when it fits. Otherwise reply "adjust" with the specific change, such as "use the settings
columns from T1, don't add a new table", and wait for a revised note. An approach that changes
the plan (a new dependency, another task's files) is a plan change: handle it as below, and ask
the user first if it changes what they asked for.
Verify before done. A child saying it's done is a claim. Check it yourself: the PR exists,
its CI is green, and the doneWhen result is observable. Write what you checked to evidence in
a line ("PR #12 open, CI green, settings page renders"). If a check fails, keep the task in
review, put the gap in note, and send the child what's missing.
Failures. A failed task may be restarted once with a corrected brief. If it fails a second
time, mark it failed and ask the user what to do; don't restart it again. Its dependents stay
waiting.
doneWhen is fixed. Change it only with a log entry saying why. Loosening it (accepting less
than it says) needs the user's word first.
Every write also sets updatedAt and adds a log/e<n> entry, one sentence. After a task goes
done, find the tasks it unblocked (every blocker now done), start them within the cap
(step 5), and say so in the same log entry: "T1 done. T3 and T4 are unblocked; started both."
If the plan changes (a task splits, a new dependency shows up), rerun the validator on the new
list, then update tasks and blockedBy in one batch and log why. Delete a task only on the
user's word.
7. Resume
After a restart or a context compaction, the board is the source of truth, not your memory.
If this session keeps an orchestrator wiki, resume it first (orchestrator-wiki step 4); its
state page lists the open boards.
Read plan/meta, every tasks doc and the last 20 log entries. For each task that isn't
done, check its real state: its child session, branch and PR. Where the board and reality
differ, fix the board in one batch with a log entry ("Resumed: T4 PR merged while away, marked
done after checks."). Then carry on from step 5.
8. Finish
When every task is done, add a final log entry, tell the user in one line with the link, and
leave the board as the record. It's private until the user shares it from the page's Share menu.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

