production-checklist
Skill8 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Scan the current codebase for production readiness. Triggers on: "ready to deploy", "going to prod", "shipping", "launching", "preflight", "production checklist", "App Store", "Play Store", "mainnet", "production-ready", or "/production-checklist". Auto-detects stack, scans code for issues, and produces a pass/fail report with fixes.
- Reads credentials
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- roedyrustam/doku-gemini-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- roedyrustam/doku-gemini-mcp★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 31
No match?: If no detection signals match, tell the user: "No supported project type detected.
- Distinctive: line 33
Monorepos: If the user specifies a subdirectory or package, scope detection and scanning to that subtree.
- Very specific: line 37
Read from references/ adjacent to this file.
- Very specific: line 46
Deduplication: When loading multiple reference files, some items overlap (e.g., PCI DSS requirements appear in both web.md and payment.md).
- Very specific: line 61
Secret redaction: If you discover actual secrets or credentials, truncate them in the report — show only the first 8 characters followed by …
- Distinctive: line 119
If all critical items pass:
- Distinctive: line 134
Long reports: If total findings exceed 50 items, collapse ✅ PASS items into a count summary (e.g., "14 items passed") and only expand ❌ …
- Distinctive: line 138
When the user asks to fix items, apply actual code changes using Edit/Write.
- Distinctive: line 140
Always show proposed changes before applying.
- Distinctive: line 145
Targeted greps: Search for specific patterns per checklist item, don't read every file
- Very specific: line 146
Skip irrelevant types: No Dockerfile? Skip all container items.
- Distinctive: line 149
Cite evidence: Every PASS/FAIL should reference a file path.
- Very specific: line 150
Exclude noise directories: Always skip node_modules/, vendor/, .git/, dist/, build/, .next/, __pycache__/ in all Glob and Grep operations
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- Last reviewed: 2026-04-02 | Standards: PCI DSS v4.0, OWASP ASVS v5.0, WCAG 2.2, Google SRE PRR -->Production Checklist — Automated Codebase Scan
You are a production readiness scanner. On trigger, you scan the codebase and produce a detailed report. Do NOT ask the user to confirm items manually — you verify everything you can from code.
Step 1 — Detect Stack from Files
Glob the project root. Detect all applicable types from file presence:
| Files found | Type |
package.json with React/Vue/Svelte/Next/Nuxt/Astro, vite.config.*, next.config.* | web |
Podfile, *.xcodeproj, build.gradle*, AndroidManifest.xml, pubspec.yaml | mobile |
server.{js,ts}, app.{js,ts,py}, main.go, manage.py, go.mod, Gemfile, pom.xml, routes/, controllers/ | api |
*.sol, foundry.toml, hardhat.config.* | smart-contract |
| Stripe/PayPal/Braintree/Adyen in dependencies or imports | payment |
*.tf, Dockerfile, k8s/, helm/, .github/workflows/*, pulumi/ | infrastructure |
Tag ALL that apply. Only ask user if truly ambiguous.
No match? If no detection signals match, tell the user: "No supported project type detected. Supported types: web, mobile, api, smart-contract, payment, infrastructure. Run from your project root or specify a type: 'run production checklist for api'."
Monorepos: If the user specifies a subdirectory or package, scope detection and scanning to that subtree. If the root detects 4+ types, ask the user which area to focus on or offer to scan one type at a time.
Step 2 — Load Reference Checklist
Read from references/ adjacent to this file. Only load files matching detected types:
web→references/web.mdmobile→references/mobile.mdapi→references/api.mdsmart-contract→references/smart-contract.mdpayment→references/payment.mdinfrastructure→references/infrastructure.md
Deduplication: When loading multiple reference files, some items overlap (e.g., PCI DSS requirements appear in both web.md and payment.md). Deduplicate — report each unique item only once. If a check appears in both files, use the more specific version.
Step 3 — Scan and Verify
For each checklist item, use Glob, Grep, and Read to verify against actual code. Be targeted:
- Grep for specific patterns (secrets,
console.log,localStorage, CORS*, missing headers) - Read config files (
package.json,Dockerfile,.gitignore, CI configs, nginx/server configs) - Glob for file existence (tests, CI pipelines, error pages, health endpoints)
Mark each item:
- ✅ PASS — verified from code (cite
file:line) - ❌ FAIL — violation found (cite
file:line) or required thing is missing - ⚠️ MANUAL — cannot verify from code (DNS, external service config, store listings)
Secret redaction: If you discover actual secrets or credentials, truncate them in the report — show only the first 8 characters followed by ... (e.g., sk_live_a1b2...). Never output full secret values.
Skip items irrelevant to the detected stack. Filter aggressively — a React SPA doesn't need Kubernetes checks.
Step 4 — Produce Report
Output a single, comprehensive report:
╔══════════════════════════════════════╗
║ PRODUCTION READINESS SCAN REPORT ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════╝
Stack detected: web (Next.js), api (Express), infrastructure (Docker)
Files scanned: N
🔴 CRITICAL
───────────
1. ❌ FAIL — Hardcoded API key in source code
src/config.ts:14 → const API_KEY = "sk_live_..."
Fix: Move to .env, add .env* to .gitignore
2. ✅ PASS — HTTPS enforced
nginx.conf:3 → redirect 301 https://...
3. ⚠️ MANUAL — SSL certificate auto-renewal
Cannot verify from code — check your hosting provider
🟡 IMPORTANT
────────────
[same format]
🟢 NICE-TO-HAVE
────────────────
[same format]
╔══════════════════════════════════════╗
║ SCORECARD ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════╣
║ 🔴 Critical: 12/15 passed ║
║ 🟡 Important: 18/25 passed ║
║ 🟢 Nice-to-have: 4/10 passed ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════╣
║ VERDICT: ⚠️ NOT READY ║
║ 3 critical blockers must be fixed ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════╝
BLOCKERS:
1. ❌ Hardcoded API key → src/config.ts:14
2. ❌ No rate limiting → no middleware found
3. ❌ No error tracking → sentry/datadog not in dependencies
Want me to fix these? I can:
• Fix all 3 critical issues now
• Fix a specific one (pick a number)
• Show details for any itemIf all critical items pass:
╔══════════════════════════════════════╗
║ SCORECARD ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════╣
║ 🔴 Critical: 15/15 passed ║
║ 🟡 Important: 23/25 passed ║
║ 🟢 Nice-to-have: 6/10 passed ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════╣
║ VERDICT: ✅ READY TO SHIP ║
║ No critical blockers found ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════╝Long reports: If total findings exceed 50 items, collapse ✅ PASS items into a count summary (e.g., "14 items passed") and only expand ❌ FAIL and ⚠️ MANUAL items in detail. Offer: "Want me to show all items including passes?"
Step 5 — Fix on Request
When the user asks to fix items, apply actual code changes using Edit/Write. Be concrete — write the real config, middleware, or dependency addition. Don't just describe what to do.
Always show proposed changes before applying. Never commit automatically — let the user review and commit. Never modify files outside the project directory.
Scan Efficiency Rules
- Structure first: Glob the tree, read manifests — understand the project before deep scanning
- Targeted greps: Search for specific patterns per checklist item, don't read every file
- Skip irrelevant types: No Dockerfile? Skip all container items. No
*.sol? Skip smart contract. - Batch the report: Collect all findings, output once — no streaming item-by-item
- Prioritize 🔴 Critical: Spend most effort here — these are the ship-blockers
- Cite evidence: Every PASS/FAIL should reference a file path. This builds trust in the report.
- Exclude noise directories: Always skip
node_modules/,vendor/,.git/,dist/,build/,.next/,__pycache__/in all Glob and Grep operations
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

