qa
Skill19 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Browser-based QA verification. Launches a real browser, navigates the app, clicks buttons, fills forms, and tests user flows. Works as a standalone skill or as a phase end condition in campaigns. Requires Playwright (optional dependency, graceful skip if not installed).
- Reads credentials
- Installs packages
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
28 rules. About 0 are common, 21 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈21
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 40
Only installs Chromium (smallest download, ~150MB).
- Distinctive: line 48
If they say no, /qa falls back to /live-preview.
- Distinctive: line 52
After building a feature (verify it actually works in a browser)
- Distinctive: line 54
When /do routes "qa", "test the app", "does it work", "click through it"
- Distinctive: line 55
When /create-app campaigns reach the verification phase
- Distinctive: line 56
After /live-preview shows something renders but you need to verify interactions
- Distinctive: line 62
Before testing, understand what to test:
- Very specific: line 64
Read the project's routes/pages (from file tree, router config, or package.json scripts)
- Distinctive: line 65
Read the PRD or campaign file (if exists) for expected user flows
- Distinctive: line 75
If no PRD or campaign exists, ask: "What should I test?
- Distinctive: line 79
Before testing, the app needs to be running:
- Distinctive: line 81
Check if a dev server is already running (try curl localhost:3000, 5173, 8080)
- Very specific: line 82
If not running, check package.json for start/dev scripts
- Very specific: line 83
Start it: npm run dev or equivalent, in background
- Distinctive: line 84
Wait for the server to be ready (poll the health endpoint or main URL)
- Distinctive: line 85
If the app won't start, report the error and stop.
- Distinctive: line 124
Verify the expected outcome (element appears, text changes, navigation occurs)
- Very specific: line 130
Write results to .planning/qa-report-{date}.md:
- Distinctive: line 156
When running as a phase end condition:
- Distinctive: line 172
Use the saved context for all subsequent tests
- Very specific: line 175
Test credentials should come from .env.example or the campaign file.
- Very specific: line 176
NEVER read from .env (protected by the hook).
- Distinctive: line 180
If Playwright isn't installed and the user declines installation:
- Distinctive: line 190
Test in production (localhost only, unless user explicitly provides a URL)
- Distinctive: line 192
Run on every edit (too expensive — invoked explicitly or as phase end condition)
- Distinctive: line 197
Every tested flow has all fields filled (steps, expected, actual, result)
- Distinctive: line 208
No routes or pages discoverable: Ask the user for 1-3 flows to test.
- Very specific: line 212
If .planning/screenshots/ does not exist: Create it before saving screenshots.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/qa — Browser QA Verification
Identity
/qa tests your app the way a user would: by actually using it. It launches a browser, navigates to pages, clicks buttons, fills forms, and verifies that interactions work. Screenshots catch visual bugs. QA catches interaction bugs.
Dependency: Playwright
/qa requires Playwright. It's an optional dependency.
If Playwright is installed: full browser QA works. If Playwright is NOT installed: the skill offers to install it, or falls back to /live-preview (screenshot-only verification).
Detection:
npx playwright --version 2>/dev/nullInstallation (if user agrees):
npm install -D playwright
npx playwright install chromiumOnly installs Chromium (smallest download, ~150MB). Not Firefox or WebKit unless the user asks for cross-browser testing.
/do setup integration: During setup, if the project is a web app (has React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, or HTML files), offer to install Playwright: "I see this is a web project. Want to enable browser QA testing? This installs Playwright (~150MB) for interaction testing. (y/n)"
If they say no, /qa falls back to /live-preview. No pressure.
When to Use
- After building a feature (verify it actually works in a browser)
- As a phase end condition: "QA verification passes for [flow]"
- When /do routes "qa", "test the app", "does it work", "click through it"
- When /create-app campaigns reach the verification phase
- After /live-preview shows something renders but you need to verify interactions
Protocol
Step 1: DISCOVER
Before testing, understand what to test:
- Read the project's routes/pages (from file tree, router config, or package.json scripts)
- Read the PRD or campaign file (if exists) for expected user flows
- Identify testable flows:
- Page loads and renders (baseline)
- Navigation between pages
- Form submissions
- Button click handlers
- Auth flows (login, logout, protected routes)
- CRUD operations (create, read, update, delete)
- Error states (invalid input, network errors)
If no PRD or campaign exists, ask: "What should I test? Give me 1-3 user flows."
Step 2: START THE APP
Before testing, the app needs to be running:
- Check if a dev server is already running (try curl localhost:3000, 5173, 8080)
- If not running, check package.json for start/dev scripts
- Start it:
npm run devor equivalent, in background - Wait for the server to be ready (poll the health endpoint or main URL)
- If the app won't start, report the error and stop. Don't test a broken app.
Track whether the agent started the server. If so, kill it on completion.
Step 3: TEST
For each flow identified in Step 1, write and run a Playwright script:
const { chromium } = require('playwright');
(async () => {
const browser = await chromium.launch({ headless: true });
const page = await browser.newPage();
// Navigate
await page.goto('http://localhost:3000');
// Verify page loaded
const title = await page.title();
// Test interactions
await page.click('button[data-testid="add-todo"]');
await page.fill('input[name="title"]', 'Test todo');
await page.click('button[type="submit"]');
// Verify result
const todoText = await page.textContent('.todo-item:last-child');
// Screenshot for evidence
await page.screenshot({ path: '.planning/screenshots/qa-flow-1.png' });
await browser.close();
})();For each test:
- Navigate to the relevant page
- Perform the user action (click, fill, submit)
- Verify the expected outcome (element appears, text changes, navigation occurs)
- Take a screenshot as evidence
- Log: PASS or FAIL with description
Step 4: REPORT
Write results to .planning/qa-report-{date}.md:
# QA Report: {App Name or Feature}
> Date: {ISO date}
> Flows tested: {N}
> Passed: {N}
> Failed: {N}
> Screenshots: .planning/screenshots/qa-*.png
## Results
### Flow 1: {description}
- Steps: {what was done}
- Expected: {what should happen}
- Actual: {what did happen}
- Result: PASS / FAIL
- Screenshot: {path}
- Notes: {any observations}
### Flow 2: ...Step 5: CAMPAIGN INTEGRATION
When running as a phase end condition:
The campaign file can specify QA conditions:
| 3 | qa_verify | /qa passes for: add todo, complete todo, delete todo |/qa reads the condition, runs those specific flows, and reports pass/fail. The phase is complete only if all specified flows pass.
Cookie and Auth Support
For apps with authentication:
- First run the auth flow: navigate to login, fill credentials, submit
- Save the browser context (cookies + localStorage state)
- Use the saved context for all subsequent tests
- This means authenticated flows work without re-logging-in per test
Test credentials should come from .env.example or the campaign file.
NEVER read from .env (protected by the hook). Use test accounts only.
Fallback: No Playwright
If Playwright isn't installed and the user declines installation:
- Fall back to /live-preview (screenshot-only)
- Report: "Browser QA unavailable (Playwright not installed). Visual verification only."
- Take screenshots of each page that would have been tested
- Mark interaction tests as SKIPPED, visual tests as PASS/FAIL
What /qa Does NOT Do
- Install Playwright without asking
- Test in production (localhost only, unless user explicitly provides a URL)
- Replace unit/integration tests (this is user-flow testing, not code testing)
- Run on every edit (too expensive — invoked explicitly or as phase end condition)
- Access .env files (uses .env.example or test credentials from campaign)
Quality Gates
- Every tested flow has all fields filled (steps, expected, actual, result)
- Screenshots are taken for every flow (pass or fail)
- Failed flows have enough detail to reproduce the issue
- The app is actually running before tests execute (not testing a dead server)
Fringe Cases
Playwright not installed and user declines: Fall back to /live-preview. Mark all interaction tests as SKIPPED in the report. Visual-only verification still runs.
Dev server won't start: Report the startup error and stop. Do not attempt to test a server that isn't running. Suggest the user fix the startup error first.
No routes or pages discoverable: Ask the user for 1-3 flows to test. Do not guess at routes.
No UI (API-only project): Report "No UI detected — /qa requires a browser-accessible interface. Use typecheck and unit tests for API verification." Then stop gracefully.
If .planning/screenshots/ does not exist: Create it before saving screenshots. If .planning/ doesn't exist, save screenshots to a qa-screenshots/ directory in the project root and note the path in the report.
Exit Protocol
---HANDOFF---
- QA Report: .planning/qa-report-{date}.md
- Flows tested: {N}
- Passed: {N} | Failed: {N} | Skipped: {N}
- Screenshots: .planning/screenshots/qa-*.png
- Server: {started by agent (killed) | was already running (left running)}
---Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- allysgrandiose674/Armory★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- ascii-diagramSkill
- doc-genSkill
- experimentSkill
- live-previewSkill
- refactorSkill
- research-fleetSkill
- researchSkill
- reviewSkill
- scaffoldSkill
- session-handoffSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-genSkill
- triageSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

