sybil-detection
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Coordinated wallet cluster detection, wash trading identification, and fake activity analysis for Solana tokens
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- IngAs8/ClaudeSkillword for word, first seen Sep 28, 2026
- agiprolabs/claude-trading-skillsword for word, first seen Mar 11, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills★ 366100% same
- IngAs8/ClaudeSkill★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository66 other files it gives its agents.
- backtraderSkill
- birdeye-apiSkill
- coingecko-apiSkill
- cointegration-analysisSkill
- copy-tradingSkill
- correlation-analysisSkill
- cost-basis-engineSkill
- crypto-tax-exportSkill
- custom-indicatorsSkill
- defillama-apiSkill
- dex-executionSkill
- dex-pool-analysisSkill
- dexscreener-apiSkill
- exit-strategiesSkill
- feature-engineeringSkill
- fixed-incomeSkill
- helius-apiSkill
- impermanent-lossSkill
- jito-bundlesSkill
- kalshi-apiSkill
- kalshi-crypto-index-marketsSkill
- kalshi-weather-marketsSkill
- kelly-criterionSkill
- liquidity-analysisSkill
- lp-mathSkill
- market-microstructureSkill
- market-microstructure-traditionalSkill
- mean-reversionSkill
- mev-analysisSkill
- ohlcv-processingSkill
- options-pricingSkill
- pandas-taSkill
- polymarket-apiSkill
- portfolio-analyticsSkill
- position-sizingSkill
- prediction-market-strategySkill
- pumpfun-mechanicsSkill
- raptor-dexSkill
- regime-detectionSkill
- regulatory-reportingSkill
- risk-managementSkill
- rl-executionSkill
- sentiment-analysisSkill
- shredstreamSkill
- signal-classificationSkill
- slippage-modelingSkill
- solana-rpcSkill
- solanatracker-apiSkill
- solana-tx-buildingSkill
- strategy-frameworkSkill
- ta-libSkill
- tax-liability-trackingSkill
- tax-loss-harvestingSkill
- token-economicsSkill
- token-holder-analysisSkill
- trade-accountingSkill
- trade-journalSkill
- trading-visualizationSkill
- vectorbtSkill
- volatility-modelingSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 229
token-holder-analysis: Use holder list as input; sybil detection adds cluster context
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Sybil Detection — Coordinated Wallet & Fake Activity Analysis
Sybil attacks in Solana token markets involve a single entity operating many wallets to create the illusion of organic activity. This skill covers detecting coordinated wallet clusters, wash trading, bundled transactions, and fake holder inflation — critical for evaluating whether a token's metrics reflect real demand or manufactured signals.
Why Sybil Detection Matters
Token markets on Solana are rife with manufactured signals:
- Inflated holder counts: 500 "holders" that are really 10 entities with 50 wallets each
- Fake volume: Wash trading between self-controlled wallets to simulate demand
- Artificial social proof: Many wallets holding small amounts to appear broadly distributed
- Rug preparation: Creator distributes supply across many wallets, then sells coordinated
- Bundled launches: PumpFun tokens where creator buys via Jito bundle in first slot
A token showing 1,000 holders with 80% funded from 3 wallets is fundamentally different from one with 1,000 independently-funded holders. Sybil detection separates real demand from theater.
Detection Categories
1. Funding Source Analysis
Trace each holder wallet back 1-2 hops to find who sent them SOL:
import httpx
def trace_funding_source(wallet: str, api_key: str, max_hops: int = 2) -> list[str]:
"""Trace SOL funding sources for a wallet via Helius parsed transactions."""
url = f"https://api.helius.xyz/v0/addresses/{wallet}/transactions"
resp = httpx.get(url, params={"api-key": api_key, "type": "TRANSFER", "limit": 50})
transfers = resp.json()
funders = []
for tx in transfers:
for transfer in tx.get("nativeTransfers", []):
if transfer["toUserAccount"] == wallet and transfer["amount"] > 0.001 * 1e9:
funders.append(transfer["fromUserAccount"])
return fundersKey signals:
- 3+ holder wallets funded from the same source = cluster
- Funding within 24h of token creation = high suspicion
- Funding amounts are identical (e.g., 0.05 SOL to each) = automated distribution
2. Co-Trading Patterns
Wallets that buy the same token at nearly the same time are likely coordinated:
def detect_co_trades(buy_events: list[dict], slot_window: int = 3) -> list[list[str]]:
"""Group wallets that bought within the same slot window."""
buy_events.sort(key=lambda x: x["slot"])
clusters = []
current_cluster = [buy_events[0]]
for i in range(1, len(buy_events)):
if buy_events[i]["slot"] - current_cluster[0]["slot"] <= slot_window:
current_cluster.append(buy_events[i])
else:
if len(current_cluster) >= 3:
clusters.append([b["wallet"] for b in current_cluster])
current_cluster = [buy_events[i]]
if len(current_cluster) >= 3:
clusters.append([b["wallet"] for b in current_cluster])
return clustersInterpretation:
- Same slot, different transactions = coordinated (bot-driven)
- Same transaction = bundled (definite sybil)
- First 3 slots after token creation = launch sniping cluster
3. Bundled Transactions
Multiple buys packed into a single Solana transaction or Jito bundle:
def check_bundle_ratio(early_buys: list[dict], bundle_window_slots: int = 5) -> dict:
"""Calculate the ratio of bundled vs independent early buys."""
bundled = [b for b in early_buys if b.get("is_bundled", False)]
first_slot = min(b["slot"] for b in early_buys) if early_buys else 0
early = [b for b in early_buys if b["slot"] - first_slot <= bundle_window_slots]
return {
"total_early_buys": len(early),
"bundled_buys": len(bundled),
"bundle_ratio": len(bundled) / max(len(early), 1),
"bundled_supply_pct": sum(b["amount"] for b in bundled) / max(sum(b["amount"] for b in early), 1),
}See references/bundler_detection.md for PumpFun-specific patterns and Jito bundle mechanics.
4. Wash Trading Detection
Same entity buying and selling through multiple wallets to inflate volume:
Signals:
- Wallet A buys token, transfers to Wallet B, Wallet B sells — circular flow
- Multiple wallets trading back and forth with no net position change
- Volume concentrated in wallet pairs with funding links
def detect_wash_cycles(transfers: list[dict], holder_set: set[str]) -> list[tuple]:
"""Find circular transfer patterns among known holders."""
# Build directed graph of transfers between holders
edges: dict[tuple, float] = {}
for t in transfers:
if t["from"] in holder_set and t["to"] in holder_set:
key = (t["from"], t["to"])
edges[key] = edges.get(key, 0) + t["amount"]
# Find reciprocal pairs (A->B and B->A both exist)
wash_pairs = []
for (a, b), vol_ab in edges.items():
vol_ba = edges.get((b, a), 0)
if vol_ba > 0:
wash_pairs.append((a, b, vol_ab, vol_ba))
return wash_pairs5. Creator Network Analysis
Identify wallets controlled by the token creator:
- Creator wallet's funding history reveals other wallets it funded
- Those wallets holding token supply = insider distribution
- Creator selling from "different" wallets = disguised dump
Key Metrics
| Metric | Formula | Healthy | Suspicious | Critical |
| Unique funder ratio | unique_funders / total_holders | > 0.8 | 0.4-0.8 | < 0.4 |
| Funding cluster size | max(cluster_sizes) | < 5 | 5-20 | > 20 |
| Co-trade score | wallets_in_first_3_slots / total_holders | < 0.1 | 0.1-0.3 | > 0.3 |
| Bundle ratio | bundled_buys / total_early_buys | < 0.1 | 0.1-0.4 | > 0.4 |
| Bundled supply % | bundled_token_amount / total_supply_sold | < 5% | 5-20% | > 20% |
| Transfer density | internal_transfers / total_transfers | < 0.1 | 0.1-0.3 | > 0.3 |
| Wash trade pairs | reciprocal_pairs / total_holder_pairs | 0 | 1-3 pairs | > 3 pairs |
Composite Risk Score
Combine individual signals into a single sybil risk score (0-100):
def compute_sybil_score(metrics: dict) -> dict:
"""Compute composite sybil risk score from individual metrics."""
weights = {
"funding_cluster": 25, # Wallets from same funder
"co_trade": 20, # Coordinated buy timing
"bundle_ratio": 20, # Bundled early transactions
"unique_funder": 15, # Diversity of funding sources
"transfer_density": 10, # Internal transfers between holders
"wash_trade": 10, # Circular trading patterns
}
scores = {}
# Each sub-score normalized to 0-1, then weighted
scores["funding_cluster"] = min(metrics.get("max_cluster_size", 0) / 20, 1.0)
scores["co_trade"] = min(metrics.get("co_trade_pct", 0) / 0.3, 1.0)
scores["bundle_ratio"] = min(metrics.get("bundle_ratio", 0) / 0.5, 1.0)
scores["unique_funder"] = 1.0 - min(metrics.get("unique_funder_ratio", 1.0), 1.0)
scores["transfer_density"] = min(metrics.get("transfer_density", 0) / 0.3, 1.0)
scores["wash_trade"] = min(metrics.get("wash_pairs", 0) / 5, 1.0)
composite = sum(scores[k] * weights[k] for k in weights)
risk_level = "LOW" if composite < 30 else "MEDIUM" if composite < 60 else "HIGH"
return {"score": round(composite, 1), "risk_level": risk_level, "components": scores}Data Sources
| Source | What It Provides | Auth Required |
| Helius parsed transactions | Funding history, transfer details, parsed instruction data | API key (free tier: 30 req/s) |
| SolanaTracker API | Bundler detection, holder lists, token metadata | API key |
| Solana RPC (getSignaturesForAddress) | Raw transaction signatures for any wallet | RPC URL |
| Solana RPC (getTokenLargestAccounts) | Top holders by balance | RPC URL |
| DexScreener | Basic token/pair data for cross-referencing | None |
Workflow: Evaluate a Token
# 1. Get top holders
holders = get_top_holders(token_mint, rpc_url)
# 2. Trace funding sources for each holder
funding_map = {}
for wallet in holders[:30]: # Top 30 is usually sufficient
funding_map[wallet] = trace_funding_source(wallet, helius_key)
# 3. Cluster by common funder
clusters = cluster_by_funder(funding_map)
# 4. Check co-trade timing
early_buys = get_early_buy_events(token_mint, helius_key)
co_trade_groups = detect_co_trades(early_buys)
# 5. Check for bundles
bundle_stats = check_bundle_ratio(early_buys)
# 6. Check wash trading
transfers = get_token_transfers(token_mint, helius_key)
wash_pairs = detect_wash_cycles(transfers, set(holders))
# 7. Compute composite score
metrics = {
"max_cluster_size": max(len(c) for c in clusters) if clusters else 0,
"co_trade_pct": sum(len(g) for g in co_trade_groups) / len(holders),
"bundle_ratio": bundle_stats["bundle_ratio"],
"unique_funder_ratio": len(set(f for fs in funding_map.values() for f in fs)) / len(holders),
"transfer_density": len(wash_pairs) / max(len(holders), 1),
"wash_pairs": len(wash_pairs),
}
result = compute_sybil_score(metrics)
print(f"Sybil Risk: {result['risk_level']} ({result['score']}/100)")Integration with Other Skills
- token-holder-analysis: Use holder list as input; sybil detection adds cluster context
- helius-api: Primary data source for parsed transaction history
- jito-bundles: Detailed bundle detection and MEV context
- liquidity-analysis: Combine with sybil score — low liquidity + high sybil = extreme risk
- whale-tracking: Distinguish real whales from sybil cluster aggregates
Files
| File | Description |
references/clustering_methods.md | Funding source clustering, co-trade timing analysis, graph-based detection methods |
references/bundler_detection.md | Bundled transaction detection, PumpFun patterns, Jito bundle mechanics |
scripts/detect_sybils.py | Full sybil detection pipeline: holders -> funding -> clusters -> risk score |
scripts/funding_tracer.py | Trace funding sources for a set of wallets, group by common ancestor |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

