agentleFS
SeaualSeaual/meta-knowledge-graph/AGENTS.md

meta-knowledge-graph

AGENTS.md14 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

This project is indexed by GitNexus as meta-knowledge-graph-main (1781 symbols, 5293 relationships, 149 execution flows). Use the GitNexus MCP tools to understand code, assess impact, and navigate safely. If any GitNexus tool warns the index is stale, run npx gitnexus analyze in terminal first. Before completing any code mo

  • Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.

    Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,774 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.

  • In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

16 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 10 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 10

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    MUST run impact analysis before editing any symbol: Before modifying a function, class, or method, run gitnexus_impact({target: …

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    MUST warn the user: if impact analysis returns HIGH or CRITICAL risk before proceeding with edits.

    line 12
  3. Very specific:

    When exploring unfamiliar code, use gitnexus_query({query: "concept"}) to find execution flows instead of grepping.

    line 13
  4. Very specific:

    When you need full context on a specific symbol — callers, callees, which execution flows it participates in — use gitnexus_context({name: …

    line 14
  5. Very specific:

    Renaming: MUST use gitnexus_rename({symbol_name: "old", new_name: "new", dry_run: true}) first.

    line 25
  6. Very specific:

    Extracting/Splitting: MUST run gitnexus_context({name: "target"}) to see all incoming/outgoing refs, then gitnexus_impact({target: …

    line 26
  7. Very specific:

    After any refactor: run gitnexus_detect_changes({scope: "all"}) to verify only expected files changed.

    line 27
  8. Very specific:

    NEVER edit a function, class, or method without first running gitnexus_impact on it.

    line 31
  9. Distinctive:

    NEVER ignore HIGH or CRITICAL risk warnings from impact analysis.

    line 32
  10. Very specific:

    NEVER rename symbols with find-and-replace — use gitnexus_rename which understands the call graph.

    line 33
  11. Very specific:

    NEVER commit changes without running gitnexus_detect_changes() to check affected scope.

    line 34
  12. Distinctive:

    Before completing any code modification task, verify:

    line 66
  13. Distinctive:

    No HIGH/CRITICAL risk warnings were ignored

    line 68
  14. Distinctive:

    All d=1 (WILL BREAK) dependents were updated

    line 70
  15. Distinctive:

    After committing code changes, the GitNexus index becomes stale.

    line 74
  16. Very specific:

    If the index previously included embeddings, preserve them by adding --embeddings:

    line 80

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md
<!-- gitnexus:start -->

GitNexus — Code Intelligence

This project is indexed by GitNexus as meta-knowledge-graph-main (1781 symbols, 5293 relationships, 149 execution flows). Use the GitNexus MCP tools to understand code, assess impact, and navigate safely.

If any GitNexus tool warns the index is stale, run npx gitnexus analyze in terminal first.

Always Do

  • MUST run impact analysis before editing any symbol. Before modifying a function, class, or method, run gitnexus_impact({target: "symbolName", direction: "upstream"}) and report the blast radius (direct callers, affected processes, risk level) to the user.
  • MUST run gitnexus_detect_changes() before committing to verify your changes only affect expected symbols and execution flows.
  • MUST warn the user if impact analysis returns HIGH or CRITICAL risk before proceeding with edits.
  • When exploring unfamiliar code, use gitnexus_query({query: "concept"}) to find execution flows instead of grepping. It returns process-grouped results ranked by relevance.
  • When you need full context on a specific symbol — callers, callees, which execution flows it participates in — use gitnexus_context({name: "symbolName"}).

When Debugging

  1. gitnexus_query({query: "<error or symptom>"}) — find execution flows related to the issue
  2. gitnexus_context({name: "<suspect function>"}) — see all callers, callees, and process participation
  3. READ gitnexus://repo/meta-knowledge-graph-main/process/{processName} — trace the full execution flow step by step
  4. For regressions: gitnexus_detect_changes({scope: "compare", base_ref: "main"}) — see what your branch changed

When Refactoring

  • Renaming: MUST use gitnexus_rename({symbol_name: "old", new_name: "new", dry_run: true}) first. Review the preview — graph edits are safe, text_search edits need manual review. Then run with dry_run: false.
  • Extracting/Splitting: MUST run gitnexus_context({name: "target"}) to see all incoming/outgoing refs, then gitnexus_impact({target: "target", direction: "upstream"}) to find all external callers before moving code.
  • After any refactor: run gitnexus_detect_changes({scope: "all"}) to verify only expected files changed.

Never Do

  • NEVER edit a function, class, or method without first running gitnexus_impact on it.
  • NEVER ignore HIGH or CRITICAL risk warnings from impact analysis.
  • NEVER rename symbols with find-and-replace — use gitnexus_rename which understands the call graph.
  • NEVER commit changes without running gitnexus_detect_changes() to check affected scope.

Tools Quick Reference

ToolWhen to useCommand
queryFind code by conceptgitnexus_query({query: "auth validation"})
context360-degree view of one symbolgitnexus_context({name: "validateUser"})
impactBlast radius before editinggitnexus_impact({target: "X", direction: "upstream"})
detect_changesPre-commit scope checkgitnexus_detect_changes({scope: "staged"})
renameSafe multi-file renamegitnexus_rename({symbol_name: "old", new_name: "new", dry_run: true})
cypherCustom graph queriesgitnexus_cypher({query: "MATCH ..."})

Impact Risk Levels

DepthMeaningAction
d=1WILL BREAK — direct callers/importersMUST update these
d=2LIKELY AFFECTED — indirect depsShould test
d=3MAY NEED TESTING — transitiveTest if critical path

Resources

ResourceUse for
gitnexus://repo/meta-knowledge-graph-main/contextCodebase overview, check index freshness
gitnexus://repo/meta-knowledge-graph-main/clustersAll functional areas
gitnexus://repo/meta-knowledge-graph-main/processesAll execution flows
gitnexus://repo/meta-knowledge-graph-main/process/{name}Step-by-step execution trace

Self-Check Before Finishing

Before completing any code modification task, verify:

  1. gitnexus_impact was run for all modified symbols
  2. No HIGH/CRITICAL risk warnings were ignored
  3. gitnexus_detect_changes() confirms changes match expected scope
  4. All d=1 (WILL BREAK) dependents were updated

Keeping the Index Fresh

After committing code changes, the GitNexus index becomes stale. Re-run analyze to update it:

npx gitnexus analyze

If the index previously included embeddings, preserve them by adding --embeddings:

npx gitnexus analyze --embeddings

To check whether embeddings exist, inspect .gitnexus/meta.json — the stats.embeddings field shows the count (0 means no embeddings). Running analyze without --embeddings will delete any previously generated embeddings.

Claude Code users: A PostToolUse hook handles this automatically after git commit and git merge.

CLI

TaskRead this skill file
Understand architecture / "How does X work?".claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-exploring/SKILL.md
Blast radius / "What breaks if I change X?".claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-impact-analysis/SKILL.md
Trace bugs / "Why is X failing?".claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-debugging/SKILL.md
Rename / extract / split / refactor.claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-refactoring/SKILL.md
Tools, resources, schema reference.claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-guide/SKILL.md
Index, status, clean, wiki CLI commands.claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-cli/SKILL.md
<!-- gitnexus:end -->

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.