ncbi-eutilities-assistant
Skill4 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Query NCBI Entrez databases through official E-utilities with deterministic search, summary, fetch, link, and history workflows.
In this repository56 other files it gives its agents.
- bioinformatics-env-setupSkill
- design-thermostable-mutationsSkill
- download-gdcSkill
- download-geoSkill
- download-sraSkill
- source-summarizerSkill
- genome-alignment-qcSkill
- genome-read-alignmentSkill
- genome-variant-annotationSkill
- genome-variant-callingSkill
- genome-variant-filteringSkill
- metagenome-assemblySkill
- metagenome-binningSkill
- metagenome-functional-profilingSkill
- metagenome-host-removalSkill
- metagenome-taxonomic-profilingSkill
- ngs-quality-controlSkill
- ngs-read-preprocessingSkill
- paper-to-briefSkill
- predict-protein-heat-stabilitySkill
- researchSkill
- rnaseq-alignment-qcSkill
- rnaseq-differential-expressionSkill
- rnaseq-functional-enrichmentSkill
- rnaseq-read-alignmentSkill
- rnaseq-read-countingSkill
- rnaseq-transcript-quantificationSkill
- rpsblast-assistantSkill
- scrnaseq-cellranger-countSkill
- scrnaseq-cell-type-annotationSkill
- scrnaseq-clusteringSkill
- scrnaseq-differential-expressionSkill
- scrnaseq-integrationSkill
- scrnaseq-quality-controlSkill
- scrnaseq-trajectory-analysisSkill
- search-enaSkill
- search-geoSkill
- search-gsaSkill
- search-ncbi-datasetsSkill
- search-sraSkill
- stat-analyze-distributionSkill
- stat-assess-data-qualitySkill
- stat-bayesian-estimationSkill
- stat-cluster-samplesSkill
- stat-compare-multiple-groupsSkill
- stat-compare-two-groupsSkill
- stat-fit-glmSkill
- stat-fit-linear-modelSkill
- stat-learn-bayesian-networkSkill
- stat-logistic-regressionSkill
- stat-nonlinear-embeddingSkill
- stat-pairwise-correlationSkill
- stat-pcaSkill
- stat-survival-analysisSkill
- structured-intelligence-skill-creatorSkill
- <skill-id>Skill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
search term for search
- Distinctive: line 50
Read eutilities-reference.md when endpoint semantics or limits are uncertain.
- Very specific: line 62
Prefer search --usehistory y for large result sets, then continue with summary or fetch using --webenv and --query-key.
- Very specific: line 66
Use --dry-run before live calls when the user wants to inspect or approve the request shape.
- Distinctive: line 75
search term, IDs, or history parameters
- Very specific: line 104
When --dry-run is used:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: NCBI E-utilities Assistant
Use When
- A user wants to query NCBI Entrez databases such as
pubmed,gene,protein,nuccore,assembly, orsnpthrough the official E-utilities API. - A user needs deterministic command-line access to
einfo,esearch,esummary,efetch,elink, orepost. - A user wants a higher-level PubMed workflow that searches, summarizes, and optionally fetches abstracts/full records in one command.
- A user wants a PubMed literature-review workflow that extracts titles, abstracts, authors, MeSH terms, keywords, and article IDs into structured JSON/JSONL.
- A user wants a time-bounded PubMed research update brief, such as "show me the last 7 days of CRISPR progress" or "summarize the last month of base editing papers."
- A user wants to retrieve records in batches, page through results, or use the Entrez History server (
WebEnv+query_key) instead of issuing one request per ID. - A user wants the exact request URL, method, and parameters before making the network call.
Inputs
- Required:
- target endpoint:
info,search,summary,fetch,link, orpost - target database, such as
pubmed,gene,protein,nuccore, or another Entrez database - one of:
- search term for
search - ID list or ID file for
summary,fetch,link, andpost WebEnv+query_keyfor history-basedsummary,fetch, andlink
- search term for
- target endpoint:
- Optional:
- for the high-level PubMed flow:
- search term
- output directory
- whether to run
efetch efetchretmode/rettype, defaulting to PubMed abstract-oriented retrieval
- for the PubMed review flow:
- search term
- output directory
- optional date and sort filters
- optional explicit
records.json/records.jsonloutput paths
- for the PubMed update brief flow:
- topic term, such as
CRISPR,base editing, orprime editing - relative date window such as 7 or 30 days, or explicit date range
- maximum number of papers to include
- output directory and optional markdown brief path
- topic term, such as
email,tool, andapi_keyretmode,rettype,retmax,retstart,sort, and date filters- output path
--dry-runto print the exact request plan without making the network call
- for the high-level PubMed flow:
Workflow
- Read eutilities-reference.md when endpoint semantics or limits are uncertain.
- Translate the request into one of the deterministic wrapper commands:
scripts/run.sh infoscripts/run.sh searchscripts/run.sh summaryscripts/run.sh fetchscripts/run.sh linkscripts/run.sh postscripts/run.sh pubmed-workflowscripts/run.sh pubmed-reviewscripts/run.sh pubmed-update-brief
- Include
--emailwhenever available. Keep--toolset unless the user has a strong reason to override it. Include--api-keywhen higher request throughput is needed. - Prefer
search --usehistory yfor large result sets, then continue withsummaryorfetchusing--webenvand--query-key. - For PubMed-first tasks, prefer
pubmed-workflowover hand-building three separate commands unless the user explicitly wants raw endpoint-level control. - For literature-review preparation, prefer
pubmed-review; it performs PubMed retrieval and extracts structured records fromefetchXML. - For recurring "latest progress" requests, prefer
pubmed-update-brief; it writes a deterministicbrief.mddraft plus the raw retrieval artifacts. - Use
--dry-runbefore live calls when the user wants to inspect or approve the request shape. - For long ID lists or
--id-file, let the script auto-selectPOST. - Report the exact command, endpoint, database, key parameters, and where the response was written.
Output Contract
- Exact command(s) run
- Endpoint name and target database(s)
- Key request parameters:
- search term, IDs, or history parameters
retmode/rettype- paging controls such as
retmaxandretstart
- Response destination:
- inline output summary, or
- saved file path
- For
pubmed-workflow:esearch.jsonesummary.jsonwhen hits are returnedefetch.*when--include-fetch yesmanifest.jsondescribing counts, IDs,WebEnv,query_key, and output paths
- For
pubmed-review:esearch.jsonesummary.jsonefetch.xmlrecords.jsonrecords.jsonlmanifest.json
- For
pubmed-update-brief:esearch.jsonesummary.jsonefetch.xmlrecords.jsonrecords.jsonlbrief.mdmanifest.json
- For history workflows:
- whether the response contains
WebEnv/query_key - the recommended next command
- whether the response contains
- When
--dry-runis used:- request method
- request URL
- request body when applicable
Limits
- This skill depends on live access to
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/. - NCBI recommends no more than 3 requests per second without an API key, and up to 10 requests per second by default with an API key.
EFetchoutput formats vary by database;retmodeandrettypemust match what the target database supports.- JSON output is not uniformly available for every endpoint/database combination, so XML or text may still be required.
- Common failure cases:
- missing or wrong
db - providing IDs when the workflow should use
WebEnv+query_key, or vice versa - omitting
email/toolin repeated or high-volume use - exceeding NCBI rate limits
- assuming
retmode=jsonis available for every request - trying to retrieve large result sets one ID at a time instead of using history
- missing or wrong
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

