agentleFS
SantiagoVqzSantiagoVqz/claude-skills/skills/support/issue/SKILL.md

issue

Skill2 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

File issues in the tracker: an idea, a bug, a task, a follow-up, or the specs and tickets that other skills of this set hand it. Use when the user runs /issue, asks to file, track or capture work for later, says \"file a follow-up\", or starts work that has no issue yet.

50 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use branch, commit and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MindgamesSkill

    branch

    Use when a user asks to create a new local git branch and start issue work (for example, "create branch" or "start working on issue XYZ"). Use this for issue-based branch naming in the `type/scope-short-description` pattern and for always syncing local `main` from `origin/main` before creating the new branch, creating the local tracking `main` branch first when needed.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    commit

    Create commit messages following Sentry conventions. Use when committing code changes, writing commit messages, or formatting git history. Follows conventional commits with Sentry-specific issue references.

    Also in 19 projects that use this

  • vertz-devSkill

    backlog

    Manages deferred/blocked work items as GitHub Issues with labels and blocker tracking

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • CodeWithBehnamSkill

    browse

    Fast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate any URL, interact with elements, verify page state, diff before/after actions, take annotated screenshots, check responsive layouts, test forms and uploads, handle dialogs, and assert element states. ~100ms per command. Use when you need to test a feature, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with evidence.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    test

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    lint

    Run all linting and spell checking for TypeScript and Rust code. Run this before committing to catch style issues, clippy warnings, and misspellings.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +1 more from Azure

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 48 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Leave out a section that has no content.

    line 77
  2. Very specific:

    Keep facts and hypotheses apart.

    line 79
  3. Very specific:

    Read the ## Agent skills block in AGENTS.md, then docs/agents/tracker.md.

    line 91
  4. Very specific:

    Add a label only when it exists.

    line 93
  5. Very specific:

    Read the conversation first.

    line 99
  6. Distinctive:

    Read the code that each issue touches, enough to use the repo's words, and to check each finding.

    line 103
  7. Distinctive:

    Ask for each template section that the conversation and the code do not fill, one question at a time with the question tool.

    line 105

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 48 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Issue

/issue is the clerk of the tracker. It turns what the user says, and what the conversation already found, into issues with the right template, labels and blocking edges. It gives back each number. It changes no code and no branch. Other skills call it to publish the issues that they wrote, so the create, label and link rules live here.

An issue from this skill is a handoff: the next skill, such as /diagnose <n>, starts from it with no new input from the user. So the body carries every finding that the conversation has, and the questions that are still open.

Kinds

KindLabelBodyNext step
IdeaideaThe idea template below./spec <n>
BugbugThe bug template below./diagnose <n>
TasknoneThe Lone ticket section of TICKETS.md./build <n>
SpecspecThe caller writes it.the caller's
Ticketnone, and the parent specThe caller writes it.the caller's

A task is a lone ticket: a one-off change with a known result, and no parent spec. A defect whose cause is unknown is a bug: /diagnose finds the cause.

Idea template:

## Problem

Who has the problem, and what it costs them now.

## Idea

The change that the user has in mind, in the user's words.

## Known facts

- Each fact about the current behavior, with the file or doc section that backs it.

## Open questions

- Each question that the spec must settle, with the current rule when one exists.

## Where to look

- The modules, docs sections and old issues that bear on the idea.

Bug template:

## Symptom

What goes wrong, as the user sees it, with each error, status and count. Redact secrets, tokens and personal data.

## Steps to see it

1. Each step, from a known start.

## Known facts

- Each fact that the conversation proved, with the file or doc section that backs it. A fact also says what is not the cause.

## Hypotheses to rank

1. Each likely cause, with the place to check it.

## Open question for the fix

Each decision that the fix must make, with the current rule and the reason for it.

## Where to look

- The modules and functions, the tests and recorded fixtures that a loop can use, the docs sections, and old issues.

Leave out a section that has no content. The title uses the repo's words. A bug title says what goes wrong, such as "Invoice total ignores the discount".

Keep facts and hypotheses apart. A fact is something that the conversation saw in the code, a log or the screenshot. A likely cause is a hypothesis until /diagnose makes it go red.

A screenshot does not go into the issue through gh. Write what it shows as text: a table for a table, and each error, status and count exactly as it reads. The report tells the user to drag the image into the issue.

Called by a skill

A caller, such as /spec, hands you a list of issues. Each issue has a ref such as T1, a kind, a title, a body, its labels, and, when they apply, a parent and its blockers. A blocker is a ref from the list or an issue number. The caller already has the user's approval, so do only step 1 and step 5 below.

Give back each ref with its number and URL, and each label that you could not add. With no tracker, give back the text of each issue, by its ref.

1. Load the setup

Read the ## Agent skills block in AGENTS.md, then docs/agents/tracker.md. When the block is missing, read NO-SETUP.md in the folder of the setup-skills skill, and go on with its Tracker line. Run gh label list on GitHub.

Add a label only when it exists. When a label of the kind is missing, create the issue without it, and name the label in the report. /setup-skills creates it.

Completion: you know how to create, label and link an issue in this repo, and which labels exist, or you know that the repo has no tracker.

2. Gather

Read the conversation first. It often holds the work already done: an /ask route, a diagnosis, a decision in an interview, a screenshot. Each issue takes the findings that bear on it.

Find the issues to file. One request can hold several, such as a bug and an idea that waits for it. For each one, find its kind, and the issues that must finish before it: each one is a blocker. Ask for a kind only when two kinds fit.

Read the code that each issue touches, enough to use the repo's words, and to check each finding. This is a capture, not a spec: stop when you can fill the template.

Ask for each template section that the conversation and the code do not fill, one question at a time with the question tool. Put your best guess first. Ask three questions at most for each issue.

A follow-up is an issue that the user asks for during other work, such as an interview. Take its facts from the conversation, and ask nothing unless two kinds fit. When the work has an issue, add Found during #<n>. as the last line of the body. After step 5, go back to the work at the point where it stopped.

Completion: you have each issue with its kind and its blockers, and each section of its template that the facts can fill.

3. Look for duplicates

For each issue, search the open issues for the key words of its title: gh issue list --state open --search "<words>". Read each result that could be the same issue.

When an open issue is the same one, show it, and ask: "Use #<n>", "Comment on #<n>" or "File a new one". A comment adds what the conversation knows that the issue does not say, as tracker.md says. A used issue keeps its number as a blocker for the others.

Completion: no open issue is the same one, or the user picked what to do with it.

4. Approve

Show each draft in your message: the title, the labels, the blockers, and the full body. For several issues, add the order in one line, such as "the bug first, then the idea". Then ask once with the question tool: "File them" or "Change". When the user picks Change, apply the edits, show the drafts again and ask again.

Completion: each full draft is in the chat above the question, and the user picked "File them".

5. File

Create the issues in order, blockers first, so that each blocker has a number before the issue that it blocks. For each one, write the body to a file with the Write tool, create the issue with its labels, and --parent <n> when it has a parent, as tracker.md says. Delete the file. Then add each blocking edge.

With no tracker, print the title and body of each issue in the chat, one block for each, in order, that the user can paste.

Completion: each issue exists with its labels, parent and blocking edges, and you have each number, or the user has the text of each issue.

Report

For each issue: URL · kind · labels · blocked by. Then each missing label, each screenshot to drag into an issue, and the next step: the command from the Kinds table for each issue that has no open blocker, with its number.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.