Discord Todo Ops
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Wraps a reaction-based, Discord-backed shared team todo list (add/edit via scripts, accept/complete via Discord itself) into one skill instead of remembering separate script invocations and slash-command semantics each time. Use whenever adding, editing, or checking status on a shared team todo list that's backed by a Discord bot.
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- templates/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- braindump-autoSkill
- braindumpSkill
- Capability Claim GroundingSkill
- Derived Figure AuditSkill
- design-review-loopSkill
- Dictation Garble CatcherSkill
- Full Account Security AuditSkill
- Large Task Session SplitSkill
- Personal Dashboard StyleSkill
- Pre-Push Secret ScanSkill
- Project Design DocSkill
- Public Repo Leak RetractionSkill
- repo-hygieneSkill
- Repo Index Drift CheckSkill
- Safe Section DeletionSkill
- Session HandoffSkill
- Skill Overlap AuditSkill
- superbraindumpSkill
- ui-change-visual-verifySkill
- Verify, Don't TrustSkill
- Windows Process Restart (Safe)Skill
- Windows Shell Tool SelectionSkill
- Worktree Task-Pack VerificationSkill
- Zombie Process SweepSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
If the task was already accepted by someone, editing it should also push an update notification to that person's progress channel.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Discord Todo Ops
A shared todo list where the list itself lives in a Discord channel, backed by small scripts for the parts that need to run outside Discord (adding and editing entries), and Discord's own reactions/slash-commands for the human-driven parts (accepting, completing).
The three operations
Add a task (from any working directory, the scripts load their own config):
node path/to/discord-bot/add-todo.js "task text" --by "Claude (<project name>)"Edit a task (matches by id or a text substring, rewrites both the task text and its Discord post):
node path/to/discord-bot/edit-todo.js "task query" "new task text"If the task was already accepted by someone, editing it should also push an update notification to that person's progress channel. Don't silently change accepted work without surfacing the change to whoever claimed it.
Complete a task: this is a human action, not a script: a person reacts ✅ on the Discord post itself. Don't try to mark something complete programmatically; that decision belongs to whoever's actually doing the work.
Claim a task: also a human/Discord-native action via a slash command in the channel (e.g. /todo accept task:"..."), not a script.
Why this split matters
Adding and editing are mechanical (any agent can do them on someone's behalf), but accepting and completing represent a real commitment from a specific person. Keeping those as native Discord actions (reaction, slash command) instead of scriptable ones means the audit trail of "who actually claimed and finished what" stays honest and can't be silently spoofed by an agent.
One-off scripts against the same bot
For anything beyond these three operations (checking server structure, testing a new bot feature, verifying webhook health), write a disposable script following the bot project's own scripting conventions rather than improvising inline multi-line commands against a live Discord connection.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

