backlog-estimation-assistant
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Turns a raw user-story list into an estimated, prioritized, development-ready backlog. Assigns each story a Fibonacci story-point value, a MoSCoW-derived priority (P0/P1/P2), and a complexity rating (Low/Medium/High), each with a short justification. Use whenever the user needs effort estimation, story points, prioritization, sprint sizing, relative sizing, or a backlog made ready for development planning.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- prd-generatorSkill
- project-initiation-assistantSkill
- requirement-analyzerSkill
- requirement-to-prdSkill
- sheet-tracker-creatorSkill
- user-story-generatorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
Use the scale 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Backlog Estimation Assistant
Estimation is where backlogs earn trust. This skill assigns each story three things — effort, priority, and complexity — using consistent, defensible rules so the numbers mean the same thing across the whole backlog.
Instructions
Step 1: Take the epics and stories as input
Ideally the JSON from user-story-generator. Estimate stories, not epics; an epic's
size is the sum of its stories.
Step 2: Assign story points (Fibonacci)
Use the scale 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21. Points are relative effort, blending
complexity, uncertainty, and volume of work — not hours. Anchor the backlog: pick one
small, well-understood story as your "3" and size everything else against it. A story
at 13+ is a signal it should probably be split. See references/estimation-guide.md
for the reference scale with examples.
Step 3: Assign priority (MoSCoW → P-level)
Classify each story Must / Should / Could / Won't-this-release, then map:
- Must → P0 — the release fails without it.
- Should → P1 — important, but the release can ship without it if forced.
- Could → P2 — nice to have.
- Won't (this release) — drop from this backlog; note it as future scope.
Step 4: Rate complexity
Low / Medium / High, based on technical risk and unknowns — distinct from effort. A story can be small (2 points) but High complexity (for example, a tricky third-party integration with little documentation). Complexity flags where the team needs its most experienced people or a spike.
Step 5: Justify every number
One short line per story explaining the point value and any High complexity. Unjustified estimates get overridden in planning; justified ones start a useful conversation.
Output format
Present a backlog table AND augment each story object with three fields:
{
"id": "US-01",
"story_points": 5,
"priority": "P0",
"complexity": "Medium",
"justification": "Standard reorder flow; medium because it touches the cart and stock check."
}Also report the totals: total story points, points per epic, and the count of P0 stories — these drive the first sprint plan.
Example
| Story | Points | Priority | Complexity | Why |
| US-04 Reorder from history | 5 | P0 | Medium | Touches cart + stock check |
| US-07 bKash payment | 8 | P0 | High | Third-party gateway, sandbox unknowns |
| US-11 Dark mode | 2 | P2 | Low | Cosmetic, well-understood |
Troubleshooting
- Everything is a Must / P0. Force ranking: if the client had to cut one story to hit the deadline, which goes first? Repeat until priorities spread out.
- A story is 13+ points. Recommend splitting it (send it back to
user-story-generator) rather than committing a giant story to a sprint. - Effort and complexity keep collapsing into one number. Re-read Step 4: effort is "how much work," complexity is "how likely we are to be wrong." Keep them separate.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

