agentleFS
Sagargupta16Sagargupta16/claude-code-recipes/skills/git-workflow/SKILL.md

git-workflow

Skill8 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Git conventions covering branch naming, conventional commits, PR format, squash strategy, and protected branches. Use when committing, branching, opening PRs, or setting up a git workflow for a project.

  • Commits and pushes

188 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use squad-commands, ci-cd-pipelines and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    squad-commands

    Categorized catalog of common Squad operations. Coordinator reads this file and presents it as an interactive menu when the user asks for available commands or help.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • harrissohail6Skill

    ci-cd-pipelines

    CI/CD pipeline design and implementation. Auto-activates when discussing deployment, automation, or pipelines.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    architectural-proposals

    How to write comprehensive architectural proposals that drive alignment before code is written

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • GitHubSkill

    e2e-template-testing

    End-to-end validation of coordinator and agent template changes

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GitHubSkill

    notification-routing

    Route agent notifications to specific channels by type — prevent alert fatigue from single-channel flooding

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • frostneySkill

    native-nostalgia-stack

    Applies the user's FreePascal toolchain and its build, formatting, hook, and test contracts while leaving project-specific mechanics local. Use when scaffolding or working in a FreePascal project that follows this toolchain.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +5 more from Azure
  • +1 more from github

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 165 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use the format: <type>/<ticket>-<short-description>

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Include the ticket number: when a tracker exists

    line 28
  3. Distinctive:

    Follow the Conventional Commits specification.

    line 34
  4. Distinctive:

    Use the same format as conventional commits:

    line 102
  5. Distinctive:

    Use squash merge for feature branches:

    line 144
  6. Distinctive:

    All commits in the branch become one commit on main

    line 146

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 165 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Git Workflow

Git conventions: branch naming, conventional commits, PR format, squash strategy, and protected branches.

Branch Naming

Use the format: <type>/<ticket>-<short-description>

TypePurposeExample
feat/New featurefeat/PROJ-123-user-avatars
fix/Bug fixfix/PROJ-456-login-redirect
chore/Maintenance, deps, configchore/upgrade-react-19
docs/Documentation onlydocs/api-authentication-guide
refactor/Code restructuringrefactor/extract-auth-module
test/Adding or fixing teststest/order-service-coverage
hotfix/Urgent production fixhotfix/payment-timeout

Rules

  1. Always branch from main (or develop if using Git Flow)
  2. Use lowercase and hyphens -- no underscores, no camelCase
  3. Include the ticket number when a tracker exists
  4. Keep descriptions under 5 words
  5. Delete branches after merging

Conventional Commits

Follow the Conventional Commits specification.

Format

<type>(<scope>): <subject>

<body>

<footer>

Types

TypeWhen to Use
featNew feature visible to users
fixBug fix
docsDocumentation changes only
styleFormatting, whitespace (no logic changes)
refactorCode change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
perfPerformance improvement
testAdding or updating tests
buildBuild system or dependencies
ciCI/CD pipeline changes
choreOther changes that don't modify src or test files
revertReverts a previous commit

Rules

  1. Subject line under 72 characters
  2. Use imperative mood -- "add feature" not "added feature" or "adds feature"
  3. No period at the end of the subject
  4. Scope is optional but encouraged -- use the module or component name
  5. Body explains why, not what -- the diff shows what changed
  6. Footer for breaking changes and issue references

Examples

feat(auth): add OAuth2 login with Google

Adds Google OAuth2 as a login option alongside email/password.
Users can link their Google account in settings.

Closes #234

---

fix(cart): prevent duplicate items on rapid clicks

Added debounce to the "Add to Cart" button and server-side
idempotency check using the request ID header.

Fixes #567

---

feat(api)!: change pagination from offset to cursor-based

BREAKING CHANGE: The `page` and `per_page` query parameters are
replaced by `cursor` and `limit`. See migration guide in docs.

Pull Request Format

Title

Use the same format as conventional commits:

feat(auth): add OAuth2 login with Google

Description Template

## Summary
Brief description of what changed and why.

## Changes
- First change
- Second change
- Third change

## Testing
- [ ] Unit tests pass
- [ ] Integration tests pass
- [ ] Manual testing completed

## Screenshots
(if UI changes)

## Related
Closes #123

PR Rules

  1. One concern per PR -- don't mix features with refactoring
  2. Keep PRs under 400 lines -- split larger changes into a stack
  3. Self-review before requesting review -- check the diff yourself first
  4. Respond to all review comments -- resolve or explain why not
  5. Update the PR description if scope changes
  6. Add reviewers based on CODEOWNERS -- or at least one domain expert

Merge Strategy

Squash and Merge (default)

Use squash merge for feature branches:

  1. All commits in the branch become one commit on main
  2. The squash commit message uses the PR title
  3. The PR description becomes the commit body
  4. Individual commit history is preserved in the PR

When to Use Regular Merge

  • Release branches -- preserve the full history
  • Long-lived branches -- when commit history tells a story
  • Merge commits from main into a feature branch -- to stay up to date

When to Rebase

  • Before opening a PR -- rebase on main to get a clean diff
  • To clean up local commits -- squash fixups before pushing

Protected Branches

main branch rules

  1. No direct pushes -- all changes go through PRs
  2. Require at least 1 approval (2 for critical paths)
  3. Require passing CI checks -- tests, lint, build
  4. Require up-to-date branch -- must be rebased on latest main
  5. Require signed commits (optional but recommended)
  6. No force pushes

develop branch rules (if using Git Flow)

  1. Require passing CI checks
  2. Allow direct pushes from release managers (optional)

Tagging and Releases

  1. Use semantic versioning -- v1.2.3
  2. Tag releases on main -- after the merge
  3. Write release notes -- summarize changes since the last release
  4. Automate with CI -- use GitHub Actions or equivalent to create releases on tag push
# Create a release tag
git tag -a v1.2.3 -m "Release v1.2.3"
git push origin v1.2.3

Workflow Summary

1. Create branch    git checkout -b feat/PROJ-123-user-avatars main
2. Make commits     git commit -m "feat(users): add avatar upload"
3. Push branch      git push -u origin feat/PROJ-123-user-avatars
4. Open PR          gh pr create --title "feat(users): add avatar upload"
5. Review cycle     Address feedback, push fixes
6. Squash merge     Merge via GitHub UI
7. Delete branch    git branch -d feat/PROJ-123-user-avatars
8. Pull main        git checkout main && git pull

Anti-patterns

  • Committing to main directly -- always use a branch and PR
  • Giant PRs (1000+ lines) -- split into smaller, reviewable chunks
  • Vague commit messages -- "fix stuff", "updates", "wip"
  • Long-lived feature branches -- merge frequently or use feature flags
  • Force pushing shared branches -- only force push your own branches
  • Merge commits in feature branches -- rebase instead to keep history clean

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.