release-preparer
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when converting a private development repository into a clean public release, isolating legacy code, adding repeatable release automation, or preparing Python/PyPI, Rust/Cargo, and Mojo/Pixi packages for publication.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-skills-archive-orchestratorSkill
- call-r-lib-in-pythonSkill
- code-commenterSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- end-user-xp-improverSkill
- fp-developerSkill
- lesson-documenterSkill
- plan-designerSkill
- preferred-workflowSkill
- scientific-prose-editorSkill
- simple-code-writerSkill
- spec-driven-developerSkill
- wayback-link-fallbackSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Treat secret removal and history rewriting as separate security-sensitive work.
- Distinctive: line 17
Prefer existing build and release tooling over a parallel release system.
- Distinctive: line 19
Use dry runs, temporary outputs, and explicit destination checks before copying, deleting, tagging, publishing, or creating external …
- Distinctive: line 24
Always read public repository guidance for public-release curation.
- Distinctive: line 56
Do not modernize unrelated implementation code.
- Distinctive: line 57
Do not publish secrets, private data, internal-only docs, or unclear-license material.
- Distinctive: line 58
Do not delete legacy code merely because it is excluded from the release.
- Distinctive: line 59
Do not claim reproducibility without running the documented build path.
- Distinctive: line 63
Stop when ownership or licensing is unclear, secrets may remain in history, the destination could overwrite existing work, package …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Release Preparer
Prepare a public release without rewriting the working project or publishing anything without explicit authorization.
Operating rules
- Inspect repository instructions, status, history, ignore rules, licenses, secrets, generated artifacts, package metadata, tests, and release configuration first.
- Treat secret removal and history rewriting as separate security-sensitive work; deleting a current file does not remove it from history.
- Prefer existing build and release tooling over a parallel release system.
- Preserve package identity and compatibility unless the release request changes them.
- Use dry runs, temporary outputs, and explicit destination checks before copying, deleting, tagging, publishing, or creating external resources.
Reference routing
Always read public repository guidance for public-release curation. Then read only the relevant ecosystem guidance:
- Python and PyPI
- Rust and Cargo
- Mojo and Pixi
For multi-package repositories, load each applicable guide and keep shared release policy at the repository boundary rather than duplicating it in every package.
Workflow
- Define release source, destination, included packages, excluded private/legacy material, version, and required publication targets.
- Inventory tracked and untracked content, credentials, licenses, generated files, package manifests, tests, and current automation.
- Classify each material item as publish, generate, ignore, archive separately, or stop for user direction.
- Make the smallest changes needed for a reproducible build and clean source artifact.
- Validate metadata, package contents, documentation links, licenses, builds, tests, and clean-environment installation where practical.
- Preview release or repository operations before executing authorized external actions.
- Report artifacts, commands, omissions, approvals still needed, and residual risks.
Approval-gated actions
Require explicit authorization for destructive cleanup, history rewriting, creating or replacing a public repository, pushing, tagging, creating releases, and publishing to a registry. Confirm the exact target and version immediately before an irreversible action.
Non-goals
- Do not modernize unrelated implementation code.
- Do not publish secrets, private data, internal-only docs, or unclear-license material.
- Do not delete legacy code merely because it is excluded from the release.
- Do not claim reproducibility without running the documented build path.
Stop conditions
Stop when ownership or licensing is unclear, secrets may remain in history, the destination could overwrite existing work, package identity/version conflicts exist, validation cannot be reproduced, or required publication authority is absent.
Expected output
Report release boundaries, files or automation changed, validation and package inspection results, external actions taken, deferred approvals, and remaining security or compatibility risks.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

