git
Skill2 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when user asks for git operations: branch creation, committing changes, creating pull requests.
57 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- bmcszk/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- BridgLabs/opencodereviewtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Conceptual-Machines/magda-coretheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- tsukhani/jclawtheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- cekrauseee/harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jmlrt/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use sql, databases and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
thechandanbhagatSkillsql
Write SQL queries, optimize database performance, design schemas, and debug SQL issues. Use for database operations, query optimization, and schema design.
Also in 4 projects that use this
mrgoonieSkilldatabases
Work with MongoDB (document database, BSON documents, aggregation pipelines, Atlas cloud) and PostgreSQL (relational database, SQL queries, psql CLI, pgAdmin). Use when designing database schemas, writing queries and aggregations, optimizing indexes for performance, performing database migrations, configuring replication and sharding, implementing backup and restore strategies, managing database users and permissions, analyzing query performance, or administering production databases.
Also in 3 projects that use this
mrgoonieSkilldevops
Deploy to Cloudflare (Workers, R2, D1), Docker, GCP (Cloud Run, GKE), Kubernetes (kubectl, Helm). Use for serverless, containers, CI/CD, GitOps, security audit.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkilltypescript
TypeScript best practices for this monorepo. Use this skill when: (1) writing new TypeScript code, (2) reviewing TypeScript code, (3) working with API responses, fetch calls, or JSON parsing, (4) adding or modifying types and interfaces.
Also in 4 projects that use this
VercelSkillreact
React renderer for json-render that turns JSON specs into React components. Use when working with @json-render/react, building React UIs from JSON, creating component catalogs, or rendering AI-generated specs.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkilltest
Also in 8 projects that use this
Other versions57 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 57
- macro-inc/macro★ 6ksame name
- epicenter-md/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- EpicenterHQ/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- carapace-sh/carapace-bin★ 2ksame name
- LuisaGroup/LuisaCompute★ 1.1ksame name
- kagenti/kagenti★ 303same name
- Conceptual-Machines/magda-core★ 258same name
- typv/nest-turbo-starter★ 224same name
- BridgLabs/opencodereview★ 79same name
- matteing/opal★ 59same name
47 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- handoff-sessionSkill
- html-artifactsSkill
- prompt-writerSkill
- swe-executeSkill
- swe-planSkill
- swe-researchSkill
- swe-reviewSkill
- swe-shapeSkill
- swe-specSkill
- swe-worktreeSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 51 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 7
if branch not created, create branch first before committing or opening PR
- Distinctive: line 8
if changes not committed, commit changes first before opening PR </constraints>
- Distinctive: line 12
Check for the followings for repository specific rules and instructions related to git names/messages conventions and workflows:
- Distinctive: line 39
Keep description under 72 characters
- Distinctive: line 40
NEVER update git config
- Very specific: line 41
NEVER run destructive commands (--force, hard reset) without explicit request
- Very specific: line 42
NEVER skip hooks (--no-verify) unless user asks
- Distinctive: line 43
NEVER force push unless the user explicitly requests it
- Distinctive: line 44
NEVER commit to master/main unless repository rules allow it and the user confirms it
- Distinctive: line 51
NEVER delete or rename existing branches without explicit user request
- Distinctive: line 52
NEVER force-push or reset master/main
- Distinctive: line 53
NEVER run destructive commands without confirmation
- Distinctive: line 54
If branch already exists, report this to the user and ask how to proceed
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 51 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<constraints>
- if branch not created, create branch first before committing or opening PR
- if changes not committed, commit changes first before opening PR
</constraints><repository_rules> Check for the followings for repository specific rules and instructions related to git names/messages conventions and workflows:
- AGETNS.md
- CLAUDE.md
- .agents/
Merge them with the general instructions below, with repository rules taking precedence in case of conflict. </repository_rules>
<workflows>Commit
Commit message format:
<type>[scope]: <description>
<optional body>
<optional footer>Rules
- One logical change per commit, if many files changed, create multiple commits with clear scope and messages
- Present tense: "add" not "added"
- Imperative mood: "fix bug" not "fixes bug"
- Reference issues:
Closes #123,Refs #456 - Keep description under 72 characters
- NEVER update git config
- NEVER run destructive commands (
--force, hard reset) without explicit request - NEVER skip hooks (
--no-verify) unless user asks - NEVER force push unless the user explicitly requests it
- NEVER commit to
master/mainunless repository rules allow it and the user confirms it
Branch
Branch naming format: {type}/{semantic-name}
Rules
- NEVER delete or rename existing branches without explicit user request
- NEVER force-push or reset master/main
- NEVER run destructive commands without confirmation
- If branch already exists, report this to the user and ask how to proceed
Pull Request
Title format: {type}[scope]: {description}
Description format:
## Summary
{1–3 sentences explaining what this PR does and its scope}
## Changes
- {key change 1, do not repeat file changes, focus on observable behavior changes}
- {key change 2, do not repeat file changes, focus on observable behavior changes}
- {more as needed — keep each bullet atomic and concrete}
## Why
{motivation: what problem does this solve, or what goal does it achieve.}
## Breaking Changes
{describe what breaks and how consumers should migrate. Omit if no breaking changes.}Git workflows for branching, committing, and opening pull requests, with automatic convention detection and branch-safety checks.
Types
Change types:
| Type | Purpose |
feat | New feature |
fix | Bug fix |
docs | Documentation only |
style | Formatting/style (no logic) |
refactor | Code refactor |
perf | Performance improvement |
test | Add/update tests |
build | Build system/dependencies |
ci | CI/config changes |
chore | Maintenance/misc |
</workflows>Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

