data-analyzer
Skill56 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Inspect datasets, calculate trustworthy summaries, identify patterns and anomalies, and explain decision-relevant findings with explicit assumptions.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ckt520728/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 1, 2026
- wachawo/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen May 5, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- ckt520728/claude-skills★ 0same name
- wachawo/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- academic-paper-polishSkill
- academic-pptxSkill
- academic-slidesSkill
- academic-writing-styleSkill
- analytics-data-analysisSkill
- chart-imageSkill
- content-analysisSkill
- content-research-writerSkill
- copywritingSkill
- creative-writingSkill
- dashboard-creatorSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- document-converter-suiteSkill
- docxSkill
- domain-name-brainstormerSkill
- finance-news-analysisSkill
- finance-skillsSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- image-analyzerSkill
- imageSkill
- markdown-converterSkill
- natural-writingSkill
- netlify-deploySkill
- notion-infographicSkill
- pdfSkill
- pptxSkill
- rylai-pptSkill
- seoSkill
- skill-seekersSkill
- summarizationSkill
- ui-designerSkill
- video-generationSkill
- videoSkill
- xlsxSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈11
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
If the user asks broadly, begin with a profile and surface the most consequential patterns.
- Distinctive: line 28
Check missing values, duplicates, impossible values, inconsistent categories, and parsing failures.
- Distinctive: line 32
Use counts and rates for categorical data.
- Distinctive: line 33
Use center, spread, range, and quantiles for numeric data.
- Distinctive: line 35
Use robust statistics when outliers make ordinary averages misleading.
- Distinctive: line 40
Test alternative explanations before calling a pattern important.
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not claim causation without a design that supports it.
- Distinctive: line 50
Check that filters, joins, units, and date boundaries match the stated scope.
- Distinctive: line 77
Use tables or charts only when they make comparison easier.
- Distinctive: line 81
Use the runtime's structured data and spreadsheet tools when available.
- Distinctive: line 83
Keep temporary analysis artifacts separate from user-facing deliverables.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Rylai Data Analyzer
Turn supplied data into supported conclusions. Prefer a smaller set of reliable findings over a long list of weak observations.
Analysis Workflow
- Clarify the question
- Identify the decision, target metric, comparison, population, and time window.
- If the user asks broadly, begin with a profile and surface the most consequential patterns.
- Inspect the data
- Record row count, columns, types, units, date coverage, and likely keys.
- Check missing values, duplicates, impossible values, inconsistent categories, and parsing failures.
- Preserve the original data and make exclusions visible.
- Create trustworthy summaries
- Use counts and rates for categorical data.
- Use center, spread, range, and quantiles for numeric data.
- Segment results only where group sizes and definitions remain meaningful.
- Use robust statistics when outliers make ordinary averages misleading.
- Investigate
- Compare periods, groups, or cohorts relevant to the question.
- Examine trend, seasonality, concentration, relationships, and anomalies.
- Test alternative explanations before calling a pattern important.
- Interpret
- Separate observed facts from inference.
- Quantify magnitude and denominator, not only percentage change.
- State uncertainty, sample limitations, and data-quality risks.
- Do not claim causation without a design that supports it.
- Verify
- Recalculate important totals independently.
- Check that filters, joins, units, and date boundaries match the stated scope.
- Trace each headline finding back to a reproducible calculation.
Output Contract
Return a compact report with:
Scope
Question, data source, period, record count, and filters.
Data Quality
Missingness, duplicates, exclusions, parsing issues, and material caveats.
Findings
For each finding, provide the value, comparison, denominator, and why it matters.
Recommended Actions
Tie actions to evidence and distinguish immediate decisions from further analysis.
Methods
List calculations, statistical assumptions, and transformations needed to reproduce the result.
Use tables or charts only when they make comparison easier. Never fabricate missing observations or silently replace them with zeros.
Runtime Notes
- Use the runtime's structured data and spreadsheet tools when available.
- Inspect generated tables and charts before reporting completion.
- Keep temporary analysis artifacts separate from user-facing deliverables.
- State clearly when the dataset is too incomplete to support the requested conclusion.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

