agentleFS
RylaispiritRylaispirit/rylai-codex-hermes-skills/skills/data-analyzer/SKILL.md

data-analyzer

Skill56 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Inspect datasets, calculate trustworthy summaries, identify patterns and anomalies, and explain decision-relevant findings with explicit assumptions.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈11

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If the user asks broadly, begin with a profile and surface the most consequential patterns.

    line 24
  2. Distinctive:

    Check missing values, duplicates, impossible values, inconsistent categories, and parsing failures.

    line 28
  3. Distinctive:

    Use counts and rates for categorical data.

    line 32
  4. Distinctive:

    Use center, spread, range, and quantiles for numeric data.

    line 33
  5. Distinctive:

    Use robust statistics when outliers make ordinary averages misleading.

    line 35
  6. Distinctive:

    Test alternative explanations before calling a pattern important.

    line 40
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not claim causation without a design that supports it.

    line 46
  8. Distinctive:

    Check that filters, joins, units, and date boundaries match the stated scope.

    line 50
  9. Distinctive:

    Use tables or charts only when they make comparison easier.

    line 77
  10. Distinctive:

    Use the runtime's structured data and spreadsheet tools when available.

    line 81
  11. Distinctive:

    Keep temporary analysis artifacts separate from user-facing deliverables.

    line 83

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Rylai Data Analyzer

Turn supplied data into supported conclusions. Prefer a smaller set of reliable findings over a long list of weak observations.

Analysis Workflow

  1. Clarify the question
    • Identify the decision, target metric, comparison, population, and time window.
    • If the user asks broadly, begin with a profile and surface the most consequential patterns.
  2. Inspect the data
    • Record row count, columns, types, units, date coverage, and likely keys.
    • Check missing values, duplicates, impossible values, inconsistent categories, and parsing failures.
    • Preserve the original data and make exclusions visible.
  3. Create trustworthy summaries
    • Use counts and rates for categorical data.
    • Use center, spread, range, and quantiles for numeric data.
    • Segment results only where group sizes and definitions remain meaningful.
    • Use robust statistics when outliers make ordinary averages misleading.
  4. Investigate
    • Compare periods, groups, or cohorts relevant to the question.
    • Examine trend, seasonality, concentration, relationships, and anomalies.
    • Test alternative explanations before calling a pattern important.
  5. Interpret
    • Separate observed facts from inference.
    • Quantify magnitude and denominator, not only percentage change.
    • State uncertainty, sample limitations, and data-quality risks.
    • Do not claim causation without a design that supports it.
  6. Verify
    • Recalculate important totals independently.
    • Check that filters, joins, units, and date boundaries match the stated scope.
    • Trace each headline finding back to a reproducible calculation.

Output Contract

Return a compact report with:

Scope

Question, data source, period, record count, and filters.

Data Quality

Missingness, duplicates, exclusions, parsing issues, and material caveats.

Findings

For each finding, provide the value, comparison, denominator, and why it matters.

Recommended Actions

Tie actions to evidence and distinguish immediate decisions from further analysis.

Methods

List calculations, statistical assumptions, and transformations needed to reproduce the result.

Use tables or charts only when they make comparison easier. Never fabricate missing observations or silently replace them with zeros.

Runtime Notes

  • Use the runtime's structured data and spreadsheet tools when available.
  • Inspect generated tables and charts before reporting completion.
  • Keep temporary analysis artifacts separate from user-facing deliverables.
  • State clearly when the dataset is too incomplete to support the requested conclusion.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.