agentleFS
RussBrown00RussBrown00/agent-skills/dead-horse/SKILL.md

dead-horse

Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoGPL-2.0View on GitHub

Probe the quality of your own confidence about a plan via `/dead-horse {plan-file?} {count:15} {instructions?}`. The inverse of a normal clarifying-question round: instead of asking what it is unsure about, the agent enumerates the things it is 100% CERTAIN of — the assumptions it filled in without noticing — states its answer to each, and makes the user confirm or correct them. Every correction is a confidence failure, and the report scores the miss rate and clusters the misses by category to show WHERE the agent's certainty is worthless. Resolves the plan file from the argument, else from context; exits with a notice if none is found. Every correction is researched, turned into a specific proposed plan change, and applied to the plan file once the user approves it. Each round ends with a spoken summary, then the agent offers another round — repeating as long as the user wants, since each plan update creates fresh assumptions to probe. Emits a cumulative `{plan-file}.dead-horse.md`. ACTIVATE when the user says "/dead-horse", "beat this to death", "what are you assuming", "check your assumptions", "probe your confidence", "what do you think you know", or asks for questions about things the agent is already sure of.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

22 rules. About 0 are common, 18 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈18

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.