github-ops
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
GitHub repository operations, automation, and management. Issue triage, PR management, CI/CD operations, release management, and security monitoring using the gh CLI. Use when the user wants to manage GitHub issues, PRs, CI status, releases, contributors, stale items, or any GitHub operational task beyond simple git commands.
- Commits and pushes
23 other projects use a version of this, 7 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Lukk17/agent-standardstheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemonedited, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- phntm7/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- renepf/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- ARCASSystems/FounderOStheir own version, first seen Oct 24, 2026
- kuailexiaozixin/githubtheir own version, first seen Oct 24, 2026
Other versions23 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- SamuelNDCE/claude-super-skill-library★ 1100% same
- davidanthonyn/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 7
- Fmarzochi/EGC★ 6199% same
- gongyijie85/dsh-ecc★ 899% same
- chadixearth/graphyloop★ 399% same
- NISTALTALSON/essential-claude-skills★ 171% same
- Ronnasayd/aipp★ 171% same
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemon★ 099% same
- renepf/claude-skills★ 099% same
Wrote their own version · 14
- daymade/claude-code-skills★ 1.5ksame name
- ARCASSystems/FounderOS★ 7same name
- claude-world/claude-agent★ 5same name
- ImpactMojo/ImpactMojo★ 3same name
- bjornjee/skills★ 2same name
- salmandev/everything-gemini★ 2same name
- BlueChonk/BlueChonk-skills★ 1same name
- GoogleMakesMeBetter/claude-skills-collection★ 1same name
- Lukk17/agent-standards★ 1same name
- phntm7/skills★ 1same name
4 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository269 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- examples/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/common-agents.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-development-workflow.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-git-workflow.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-performance.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-testing.mdCursor rule
- agent-introspection-debuggingSkill
- agent-sortSkill
- api-designSkill
- article-writingSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- bun-runtimeSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- content-engineSkill
- crosspostSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dmux-workflowsSkill
- documentation-lookupSkill
- e2e-testingSkill
- eval-harnessSkill
- everything-claude-code-conventionsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 36
Read the issue title, body, and comments
- Distinctive: line 37
Check if it duplicates an existing issue (search by keywords)
- Very specific: line 59
Check CI status: gh pr checks <number>
- Very specific: line 60
Check if mergeable: gh pr view <number> --json mergeable
- Distinctive: line 61
Check age and last activity
- Very specific: line 83
Check the workflow run: gh run view <run-id> --log-failed
- Distinctive: line 85
Check if it is a flaky test vs real failure
- Distinctive: line 102
When preparing a release:
- Distinctive: line 104
Check all CI is green on main
- Distinctive: line 135
Check for new Dependabot alerts weekly at minimum
- Distinctive: line 139
Before completing any GitHub operations task:
- Distinctive: line 140
all issues triaged have appropriate labels
- Distinctive: line 141
no PRs older than 7 days without a review or comment
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
GitHub Operations
Manage GitHub repositories with a focus on community health, CI reliability, and contributor experience.
When to Activate
- Triaging issues (classifying, labeling, responding, deduplicating)
- Managing PRs (review status, CI checks, stale PRs, merge readiness)
- Debugging CI/CD failures
- Preparing releases and changelogs
- Monitoring Dependabot and security alerts
- Managing contributor experience on open-source projects
- User says "check GitHub", "triage issues", "review PRs", "merge", "release", "CI is broken"
Tool Requirements
- gh CLI for all GitHub API operations
- Repository access configured via
gh auth login
Issue Triage
Classify each issue by type and priority:
Types: bug, feature-request, question, documentation, enhancement, duplicate, invalid, good-first-issue
Priority: critical (breaking/security), high (significant impact), medium (nice to have), low (cosmetic)
Triage Workflow
- Read the issue title, body, and comments
- Check if it duplicates an existing issue (search by keywords)
- Apply appropriate labels via
gh issue edit --add-label - For questions: draft and post a helpful response
- For bugs needing more info: ask for reproduction steps
- For good first issues: add
good-first-issuelabel - For duplicates: comment with link to original, add
duplicatelabel
# Search for potential duplicates
gh issue list --search "keyword" --state all --limit 20
# Add labels
gh issue edit <number> --add-label "bug,high-priority"
# Comment on issue
gh issue comment <number> --body "Thanks for reporting. Could you share reproduction steps?"PR Management
Review Checklist
- Check CI status:
gh pr checks <number> - Check if mergeable:
gh pr view <number> --json mergeable - Check age and last activity
- Flag PRs >5 days with no review
- For community PRs: ensure they have tests and follow conventions
Stale Policy
- Issues with no activity in 14+ days: add
stalelabel, comment asking for update - PRs with no activity in 7+ days: comment asking if still active
- Auto-close stale issues after 30 days with no response (add
closed-stalelabel)
# Find stale issues (no activity in 14+ days)
gh issue list --label "stale" --state open
# Find PRs with no recent activity
gh pr list --json number,title,updatedAt --jq '.[] | select(.updatedAt < "2026-03-01")'CI/CD Operations
When CI fails:
- Check the workflow run:
gh run view <run-id> --log-failed - Identify the failing step
- Check if it is a flaky test vs real failure
- For real failures: identify the root cause and suggest a fix
- For flaky tests: note the pattern for future investigation
# List recent failed runs
gh run list --status failure --limit 10
# View failed run logs
gh run view <run-id> --log-failed
# Re-run a failed workflow
gh run rerun <run-id> --failedRelease Management
When preparing a release:
- Check all CI is green on main
- Review unreleased changes:
gh pr list --state merged --base main - Generate changelog from PR titles
- Create release:
gh release create
# List merged PRs since last release
gh pr list --state merged --base main --search "merged:>2026-03-01"
# Create a release
gh release create v1.2.0 --title "v1.2.0" --generate-notes
# Create a pre-release
gh release create v1.3.0-rc1 --prerelease --title "v1.3.0 Release Candidate 1"Security Monitoring
# Check Dependabot alerts
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/dependabot/alerts --jq '.[].security_advisory.summary'
# Check secret scanning alerts
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/secret-scanning/alerts --jq '.[].state'
# Review and auto-merge safe dependency bumps
gh pr list --label "dependencies" --json number,title- Review and auto-merge safe dependency bumps
- Flag any critical/high severity alerts immediately
- Check for new Dependabot alerts weekly at minimum
Quality Gate
Before completing any GitHub operations task:
- all issues triaged have appropriate labels
- no PRs older than 7 days without a review or comment
- CI failures have been investigated (not just re-run)
- releases include accurate changelogs
- security alerts are acknowledged and tracked
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

