web-quality-audit
Skill13 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Comprehensive web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, and best practices. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. 11 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
11
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 33
Compress images: Use WebP/AVIF with fallbacks.
- Common: line 34
Minimize JavaScript: Remove unused code. Use code splitting.
- Very specific: line 36
Efficient fonts: Use font-display: swap. Preload critical fonts.
- Very specific: line 40
Preconnect to origins: Add <link rel="preconnect"> for third-party domains.
- Very specific: line 49
Text alternatives: Every <img> has meaningful alt text.
- Common: line 51
Don't rely on color alone: Use icons, patterns, or text alongside color indicators.
- Common: line 56
Keyboard accessible: All functionality available via keyboard.
- Common: line 66
Labels and instructions: All form inputs have associated labels.
- Common: line 70
Valid HTML: No duplicate IDs. Properly nested elements.
- Common: line 71
ARIA used correctly: Prefer native elements. ARIA roles match behavior.
- Common: line 81
No noindex on important pages: Check meta robots and headers.
- Common: line 101
HTTPS everywhere: No mixed content. HSTS enabled.
- Common: line 102
No vulnerable libraries: Keep dependencies updated.
- Very specific: line 109
Valid doctype: Use <!DOCTYPE html>.
- Common: line 116
Clear permission requests: Only ask when needed, with context.
- Common: line 130
When performing an audit, structure findings as:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Web quality audit
Comprehensive quality review based on Google Lighthouse audits. Covers Performance, Accessibility, SEO, and Best Practices across 150+ checks.
How it works
- Analyze the provided code/project for quality issues
- Categorize findings by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low)
- Provide specific, actionable recommendations
- Include code examples for fixes
Audit categories
Performance (40% of typical issues)
Core Web Vitals — Must pass for good page experience:
- LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) < 2.5s. The largest visible element must render quickly. Optimize images, fonts, and server response time.
- INP (Interaction to Next Paint) < 200ms. User interactions must feel instant. Reduce JavaScript execution time and break up long tasks.
- CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) < 0.1. Content must not jump around. Set explicit dimensions on images, embeds, and ads.
Resource Optimization:
- Compress images. Use WebP/AVIF with fallbacks. Serve correctly sized images via
srcset. - Minimize JavaScript. Remove unused code. Use code splitting. Defer non-critical scripts.
- Optimize CSS. Extract critical CSS. Remove unused styles. Avoid
@import. - Efficient fonts. Use
font-display: swap. Preload critical fonts. Subset to needed characters.
Loading Strategy:
- Preconnect to origins. Add
<link rel="preconnect">for third-party domains. - Preload critical assets. LCP images, fonts, and above-fold CSS.
- Lazy load below-fold content. Images, iframes, and heavy components.
- Cache effectively. Long cache TTLs for static assets. Immutable caching for hashed files.
Accessibility (30% of typical issues)
Perceivable:
- Text alternatives. Every
<img>has meaningfulalttext. Decorative images usealt="". - Color contrast. Minimum 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text (WCAG AA).
- Don't rely on color alone. Use icons, patterns, or text alongside color indicators.
- Captions and transcripts. Video has captions. Audio has transcripts.
Operable:
- Keyboard accessible. All functionality available via keyboard. No keyboard traps.
- Focus visible. Clear focus indicators on all interactive elements.
- Skip links. Provide "Skip to main content" for keyboard users.
- Sufficient time. Users can extend time limits. No auto-advancing content without controls.
Understandable:
- Page language. Set
langattribute on<html>. - Consistent navigation. Same navigation structure across pages.
- Error identification. Form errors clearly described and associated with fields.
- Labels and instructions. All form inputs have associated labels.
Robust:
- Valid HTML. No duplicate IDs. Properly nested elements.
- ARIA used correctly. Prefer native elements. ARIA roles match behavior.
- Name, role, value. Interactive elements have accessible names and correct roles.
SEO (15% of typical issues)
Crawlability:
- Valid robots.txt. Doesn't block important resources.
- XML sitemap. Lists all important pages. Submitted to Search Console.
- Canonical URLs. Prevent duplicate content issues.
- No noindex on important pages. Check meta robots and headers.
On-Page SEO:
- Unique title tags. 50-60 characters. Primary keyword included.
- Meta descriptions. 150-160 characters. Compelling and unique.
- Heading hierarchy. Single
<h1>. Logical heading structure. - Descriptive link text. Not "click here" or "read more".
Technical SEO:
- Mobile-friendly. Responsive design. Tap targets ≥ 48px.
- HTTPS. Secure connection required.
- Fast loading. Performance directly impacts ranking.
- Structured data. JSON-LD for rich snippets (Article, Product, FAQ, etc.).
Best practices (15% of typical issues)
Security:
- HTTPS everywhere. No mixed content. HSTS enabled.
- No vulnerable libraries. Keep dependencies updated.
- CSP headers. Content Security Policy to prevent XSS.
- No exposed source maps. In production builds.
Modern Standards:
- No deprecated APIs. Replace
document.write, synchronous XHR, etc. - Valid doctype. Use
<!DOCTYPE html>. - Charset declared.
<meta charset="UTF-8">as first element in<head>. - No browser errors. Clean console. No CORS issues.
UX Patterns:
- No intrusive interstitials. Especially on mobile.
- Clear permission requests. Only ask when needed, with context.
- No misleading buttons. Buttons do what they say.
Severity levels
| Level | Description | Action |
| Critical | Security vulnerabilities, complete failures | Fix immediately |
| High | Core Web Vitals failures, major a11y barriers | Fix before launch |
| Medium | Performance opportunities, SEO improvements | Fix within sprint |
| Low | Minor optimizations, code quality | Fix when convenient |
Audit output format
When performing an audit, structure findings as:
## Audit results
### Critical issues (X found)
- **[Category]** Issue description. File: `path/to/file.js:123`
- **Impact:** Why this matters
- **Fix:** Specific code change or recommendation
### High priority (X found)
...
### Summary
- Performance: X issues (Y critical)
- Accessibility: X issues (Y critical)
- SEO: X issues
- Best Practices: X issues
### Recommended priority
1. First fix this because...
2. Then address...
3. Finally optimize...Quick checklist
Before every deploy
- Core Web Vitals passing
- No accessibility errors (axe/Lighthouse)
- No console errors
- HTTPS working
- Meta tags present
Weekly review
- Check Search Console for issues
- Review Core Web Vitals trends
- Update dependencies
- Test with screen reader
Monthly deep dive
- Full Lighthouse audit
- Performance profiling
- Accessibility audit with real users
- SEO keyword review
References
For detailed guidelines on specific areas:
- Performance Optimization
- Core Web Vitals
- Accessibility
- SEO
- Best Practices
Other versions19 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 17
- midudev/preguntas-entrevista-react★ 7.8k100% same
- MiladJoodi/skills★ 2447% same
- PracticalSwan/agent-skills★ 2238% same
- xuweizhengo/skills-hub★ 448% same
- neronain/ClaudeSkills-Neronain★ 388% same
- damacus/agent-skills★ 288% same
- miptah21/skills★ 296% same
- drinkspiller/skills★ 185% same
- Manuekle/Forge★ 188% same
- vaibhav-deveree/skill-awesome★ 188% same
7 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 2
- markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills★ 16same name
- viasrijan/crazy-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use vercel-optimize, writing-beats and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
VercelSkillvercel-optimize
Use for Vercel cost and performance optimization on deployed projects, especially Next.js, SvelteKit, Nuxt, and limited Astro apps. Collect Vercel metrics, usage, project config, and code scan results first; investigate only metric-backed candidates; produce ranked recommendations grounded in verified files and version-aware Vercel/framework docs. Trigger for Vercel bill reduction, slow or expensive routes, caching opportunities, Function Invocations, Build Minutes, Fast Data Transfer, Core Web Vitals, Bot Management, Fluid compute, or cost breakdown requests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
Also in 3 projects that use this
JetBrainsSkillcanvas-design
Create beautiful visual art in .png and .pdf documents using design philosophy. You should use this skill when the user asks to create a poster, piece of art, design, or other static piece. Create original visual designs, never copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright violations.
Also in 5 projects that use this
GoogleSkillimprove-codebase-architecture
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
Also in 7 projects that use this
CloudflareSkillreceiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillsubagent-driven-development
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
Also in 4 projects that use this
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .agents/skills/vercel-composition-patterns/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .agents/skills/vercel-react-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/skills/vercel-composition-patterns/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/skills/vercel-react-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- accessibilitySkill
- agent-browserSkill
- best-practicesSkill
- core-web-vitalsSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- performanceSkill
- react-doctorSkill
- seoSkill
- tailwind-design-systemSkill
- vercel-composition-patternsSkill
- vercel-react-best-practicesSkill
- web-design-guidelinesSkill
- agent-browserSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- vercel-composition-patternsSkill
- vercel-react-best-practicesSkill
- web-design-guidelinesSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

