pct-application
Skill206 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
PCT international application preparation under PCT Rules 5-12 - unity of invention, formal requirements, national phase entry strategy, and deadline management
2 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- vijaysuperpositionist/skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- The-Utopia-Studio/skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- The-Utopia-Studio/skills★ 699% same
- vijaysuperpositionist/skills★ 099% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- bigquery-patent-searchSkill
- development-assistantSkill
- epc-searchSkill
- epo-patent-analyzerSkill
- epo-patent-searchSkill
- index-managerSkill
- mpep-searchSkill
- patent-application-creatorSkill
- patent-claims-analyzerSkill
- patent-diagram-generatorSkill
- patent-reviewerSkill
- patent-searchSkill
- prior-art-searchSkill
- setup-assistantSkill
- testing-assistantSkill
- troubleshooting-assistantSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Check PCT formalities compliance
- Distinctive: line 44
All formal requirements checking
- Distinctive: line 65
When this skill is invoked:
- Distinctive: line 132
Not used for interpreting claim scope
- Distinctive: line 140
No text except single words
- Distinctive: line 149
Test: Do all claims share a special technical feature that:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
PCT Application Skill
Preparation and validation of Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) international applications under PCT Rules 5-12.
When to Use
Invoke this skill when users ask to:
- Prepare a PCT international application
- Check PCT formalities compliance
- Assess unity of invention under Rule 13 PCT
- Plan national/regional phase entry strategy
- Calculate PCT fees and deadlines
- Convert a national application to PCT format
- Understand PCT procedure and timelines
What This Skill Does
Provides comprehensive PCT application support:
- Application Preparation (Rules 3-12 PCT):
- Request form (PCT/RO/101) guidance
- Description format (Rule 5 PCT)
- Claims structure (Rule 6 PCT)
- Abstract requirements (Rule 8 PCT)
- Drawings standards (Rule 11 PCT)
- Physical requirements (Rule 11 PCT)
- Sequence listings (Rule 12 PCT, WIPO Standard ST.26)
- Unity of Invention (Rule 13 PCT):
- Single general inventive concept assessment
- Special technical feature identification
- Linking technical feature analysis
- Unity objection risk assessment
- Claim grouping strategy
- Formalities Validation (Rules 3-12 PCT):
- All formal requirements checking
- Fee calculation per Receiving Office
- Language requirements per RO
- Physical document requirements
- National Phase Strategy:
- 30/31 month deadline tracking
- Country selection guidance
- Translation requirements per country
- National phase fee estimates
- Strategic filing considerations
Required Data
MCP Tools Available:
check_pct_formalities- PCT Rules 5-12 formalities checkingsearch_patent_law- Search PCT rules, regulations, administrative instructionssearch_patents_google- Prior art search for unity assessment (fallback:search_patents_bigquery)
How to Use
When this skill is invoked:
- Determine user's stage:
- New PCT filing from scratch
- Converting national application to PCT
- Reviewing existing PCT draft
- Planning national phase entry
- For new applications, guide through:
- Invention disclosure review
- Unity of invention assessment
- Description drafting (Rule 5 format)
- Claims structuring (Rule 6 format)
- Abstract preparation (Rule 8)
- Formalities checklist
- For review, analyze:
- All Rule 5-12 requirements
- Unity of invention
- Generate compliance report
- Suggest fixes
PCT Application Structure
Request (Rule 4 PCT)
Form PCT/RO/101 requires:
- Applicant details (name, address, nationality, residence)
- Title of invention
- Priority claim(s) (if any, within 12 months)
- Designation of states (automatic for all since 2004)
- Choice of International Searching Authority (ISA)
- Agent/representative details
Description (Rule 5 PCT)
Required sections in order:
1. Title of the Invention
2. Technical Field
3. Background Art
4. Disclosure of the Invention
- Technical problem
- Technical solution
- Advantageous effects
5. Brief Description of Drawings
6. Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
7. Industrial Applicability
8. Sequence Listing (if applicable)Claims (Rule 6 PCT)
Structure requirements:
- Numbered consecutively in Arabic numerals
- Independent claims: define essential features of the invention
- Dependent claims: refer back and further limit
- Clear, concise, fully supported by description
- Multiple claim categories allowed (product, process, apparatus, use)
- Unity of invention required (Rule 13)
Abstract (Rule 8 PCT)
- Maximum 150 words
- Indicate technical field
- Clear summary of technical problem, solution, and principal use
- Designate most illustrative figure
- Not used for interpreting claim scope
Drawings (Rule 11 PCT)
- A4 paper (29.7cm x 21cm)
- Usable area: 26.2cm x 17cm
- Margins: top 2.5cm, left 2.5cm, right 1.5cm, bottom 1cm
- Black, dense, well-defined lines
- No text except single words
- Reference signs matching description
Unity of Invention (Rule 13 PCT)
Assessment Framework
Unity requires claims to relate to one invention only or a group of inventions linked to form a single general inventive concept.
Test: Do all claims share a special technical feature that:
- Makes a contribution over the prior art, AND
- Is present in all independent claims (or links them)
Common Unity Patterns
Unity Maintained:
- Product + process for making product
- Product + use of product
- Process + apparatus specifically designed for process
- Product + process + apparatus (all sharing special technical feature)
Unity at Risk:
- Multiple independent claims without shared special technical feature
- Markush groups without common structural feature
- Method and apparatus addressing different problems
Unity Strategy
Independent Claim 1 (System): A system comprising feature X...
Independent Claim 8 (Method): A method using feature X...
Independent Claim 15 (Use): Use of feature X for...
Special Technical Feature: "feature X" - shared across all groups
Unity: MAINTAINED (single general inventive concept linked by X)PCT Timeline
Month 0: File PCT application at Receiving Office (RO)
Month 3: International search begins (ISA)
Month 16: International Search Report (ISR) issued
Month 18: International publication (WIPO)
Month 22: Demand for preliminary examination (optional, Chapter II)
Month 28: International Preliminary Examination Report (IPER)
Month 30: National/regional phase entry deadline (most countries)
Month 31: National phase deadline (some countries: US, JP, etc.)Fee Calculation
Base Fees (2025 estimates)
| Fee | Amount | Notes |
| Transmittal fee | Varies by RO | RO/US: USD 280 |
| International filing fee | CHF 1,330 | Electronic reduction: -CHF 200 |
| Search fee | Varies by ISA | ISA/EP: EUR 1,775; ISA/US: USD 2,680 |
| Additional page fee | CHF 16/page | Beyond 30 pages |
| Additional claim fee | Varies | Beyond limits set by ISA |
Electronic Filing Reduction
Filing via ePCT: CHF 200 reduction on international filing fee
National Phase Fees (Estimates)
| Country | Entry Fee | Notes |
| US (371) | ~USD 1,600 | Basic filing + search + examination |
| EP (Euro-PCT) | ~EUR 2,595 | Filing + search + designation |
| JP | ~JPY 195,000 | National fee + translation |
| CN | ~CNY 3,500 | National fee + translation |
| KR | ~KRW 460,000 | National fee + translation |
National Phase Strategy
Key Decisions
- Which countries? - Based on markets, competitors, manufacturing
- Which ISA? - Affects search quality, cost, language
- Chapter II? - Optional preliminary examination for stronger report
- Early national phase? - Some countries allow before 30 months
- Translation strategy - Cost and timing considerations
Common Filing Strategies
Broad Coverage:
- US + EP + CN + JP + KR (covers ~85% of global patent value)
Cost-Conscious:
- US + EP only (defer others until commercial validation)
Technology-Specific:
- Pharma: US + EP + JP + CN + IN + BR
- Software: US + EP + JP + KR
- Manufacturing: US + EP + CN + DE + JP
Compliance Report Format
PCT APPLICATION COMPLIANCE REPORT
====================================
Application: [Title]
Receiving Office: RO/[XX]
ISA Selected: ISA/[XX]
DESCRIPTION (Rule 5 PCT):
[PASS/FAIL] Title present
[PASS/FAIL] Technical field
[PASS/FAIL] Background art
[PASS/FAIL] Invention disclosure
[PASS/FAIL] Brief description of drawings
[PASS/FAIL] Best mode
[PASS/FAIL] Industrial applicability
CLAIMS (Rule 6 PCT):
[PASS/FAIL] Consecutively numbered
[PASS/FAIL] Supported by description
[PASS/FAIL] Clear and concise
UNITY OF INVENTION (Rule 13 PCT):
[PASS/WARN/FAIL] Single general inventive concept
Special technical feature: [identified feature]
Risk of unity objection: LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH
ABSTRACT (Rule 8 PCT):
[PASS/FAIL] Word count within 150
[PASS/FAIL] Figure designated
[PASS/FAIL] Technical field indicated
PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS (Rule 11 PCT):
[PASS/FAIL] A4 format
[PASS/FAIL] Margins
[PASS/FAIL] Page numbering
[PASS/FAIL] Line spacing
FEES:
Transmittal: [amount]
International filing: [amount]
Search: [amount]
Total: [amount]
DEADLINES:
[Date] - Priority expires (12 months)
[Date] - Furnish priority doc (16 months)
[Date] - International publication (18 months)
[Date] - Chapter II demand (22 months)
[Date] - National phase entry (30/31 months)Integration
Works with other skills/agents:
- Uses EPO Patent Analyzer skill for Euro-PCT quality
- Coordinates with EPO Patent Search for EP prior art
- Invokes EPC Search skill for PCT rule research
- Uses BigQuery Patent Search for worldwide prior art
Tools Available
- Read: To load application documents
- Bash: To run PCT compliance checks
- Write: To save compliance reports and application drafts
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

