wooldridge-econometrics
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Wooldridge 计量经济学知识库（Introductory Econometrics, 8th ed.）：估计量选择与辩护、识别假设检查、诊断与补救，以及完整实证分析的理论指导。Use when choosing/defending an estimator (OLS, IV/2SLS, FE/RE, DiD, RD, logit/Tobit/Heckit), checking identifying assumptions (MLR/TS/FD/ATE ladders), diagnosing heteroskedasticity, serial correlation, endogeneity, weak instruments, running treatment-effect/panel analyses, or whenever you need the theoretical basis for an empirical analysis — estimator choice, diagnostics, robustness, or reviewer defense. 触发词：Wooldridge、计量经济学、回归假设、工具变量、弱工具变量、双重差分、固定效应、随机效应、异方差、序列相关、单位根、时间序列回归、样本选择、稳健标准误、内生性、处理效应、estimator choice、identifying assumptions、Heckman selection、unit root、cointegration、计量实证、实证分析怎么做
In this repository55 other files it gives its agents.
- humanizer/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- _pi-config/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ai-disclosureSkill
- causal-analysisSkill
- check-methodologySkill
- diagnose-introductionSkill
- did-analysisSkill
- discussion-reviewSkill
- distill-introduction-exemplarSkill
- distill-methods-exemplarSkill
- distill-paper-exemplarSkill
- distill-results-exemplarSkill
- distill-story-exemplarSkill
- distill-theory-exemplarSkill
- empirical-intakeSkill
- empirical-pipeline-pythonSkill
- empirical-pipeline-stataSkill
- empirical-writeupSkill
- exploratory-data-analysisSkill
- grill-the-claimSkill
- handoffSkill
- humanizerSkill
- human-writingSkill
- huntington-klein-causal-designSkill
- intro-reviewSkill
- latex-tablesSkill
- literature-notes-obsidianSkill
- methods-reviewSkill
- miles-management-organization-theoriesSkill
- ml-analysisSkill
- notebooklm-pipelineSkill
- officecliSkill
- paper-reviewSkill
- paper-state-protocolSkill
- paper-story-contractSkill
- paper-writing-stackSkill
- polishSkill
- pollock-qcSkill
- proofreadSkill
- python-panel-dataSkill
- research-gap-diagnosisSkill
- results-reviewSkill
- reverse-validation-pipelineSkill
- revision-coachSkill
- run-empirical-researchSkill
- stata-data-cleaningSkill
- stataSkill
- theory-reviewSkill
- toc-reviewSkill
- tod-debateSkill
- write-introductionSkill
- write-methodsSkill
- write-resultsSkill
- write-theorySkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.