ai-code-review
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run an AI-assisted code review covering correctness, security, and simplification. AI 辅助代码审查。
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- guang-lee-cn/scaffold-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- evertonfernandes3321-wq/mythos-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- leafyoung/shared_skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- leafyoung/pi-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 7, 2026
- newesp/my-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 19, 2026
- daedalus/skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 9, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- guang-lee-cn/scaffold-skills★ 2same name
- leafyoung/pi-agent-skills★ 2same name
- leafyoung/shared_skills★ 2same name
- daedalus/skills★ 1same name
- evertonfernandes3321-wq/mythos-skills★ 0same name
- newesp/my-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-cost-estimatorSkill
- ai-news-digestSkill
- ai-paper-highlightsSkill
- ai-tools-radarSkill
- ai-writing-assistantSkill
- embedding-searchSkill
- fine-tuning-decisionsSkill
- llm-evaluationSkill
- llm-security-checklistSkill
- mcp-server-guideSkill
- model-comparisonSkill
- prompt-engineering-playbookSkill
- rag-pipelineSkill
- structured-output-validationSkill
The file
Files
AI Code Review | AI 代码审查
Review a set of changes for bugs, security issues, and simplification — and report findings with concrete file:line anchors.
审查一段改动：找 bug、找安全隐患、找可简化的地方，并给到具体位置。
When to use | 适用场景
- 用户说「帮我 review 这段改动 / 这个 PR」
- 提交前自查
Workflow | 工作流程
- 明确审查范围：改动 diff / 某个 commit / 某几个文件。
- 逐文件看改动，重点：
- 正确性：边界条件、空值、并发、错误处理
- 安全：输入校验、密钥泄露、注入、越权
- 简化：重复代码、可复用已有函数、过度设计
- 给每条发现标
file:line，按严重度排序（严重 / 建议 / 风格）。 - 给整体结论 + 建议的修复顺序。
Tips | 提示
- 只说「有问题」没用，务必给出位置和为什么。
- 拿不准的标「需确认」，不要臆断。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.