technical-review
Skill0 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
评审需求与技术选型的架构可行性,定义 API 契约、数据模型、识别风险项。在技术选型之后、程序设计之前使用。
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- rmichak/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- victor-falcon/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- TJM-NZ/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- chakmarebel/federal-proposal-copilottheir own version, first seen Aug 20, 2026
- frameforged/technical-documentation-frameworktheir own version, first seen Jul 2, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- victor-falcon/skills★ 16same name
- chakmarebel/federal-proposal-copilot★ 4same name
- frameforged/technical-documentation-framework★ 2same name
- rmichak/claude-skills★ 1same name
- TJM-NZ/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- .claude/skills/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- code-developmentSkill
- dev-workflowSkill
- history-managerSkill
- program-designSkill
- requirements-analysisSkill
- self-verificationSkill
- task-breakdownSkill
- technology-selectionSkill
- unit-testingSkill
The file
Files
技术评审
何时使用
- 全栈工作流第 3 阶段:技术选型完成后、程序设计之前。
- 用户要求评审架构、API 契约或风险分析时。
输入
读取当前迭代目录下的:
- 需求文档(
requirements-{id}.md) - 技术选型文档(
technology-selection-{id}.md)
执行要点
- 架构可行性:技术选型能否满足需求中的功能与非功能要求(性能、安全、部署)。
- API 契约定义:列出核心接口的路径、方法、请求/响应 schema、状态码约定。
- 数据模型:核心实体、字段、关系、索引建议。
- 风险清单:技术风险、依赖风险、未确认项,每条附建议对策。
- 评审结论:通过 / 有条件通过(列出必须修正项) / 不通过(需重做选型)。
辅助资料
- 完整示例输出:examples/sample-output.md — 展示一份合格评审文档的完整结构与深度
- 评审参考:reference.md — 评审维度清单、API 设计规范、常见风险类型、结论标准
产出
- 使用 templates/review-template.md 产出评审文档,供「程序设计」使用。
文档与状态
- 产出写入
docs/{current_iteration_id}/technical-review-{technical_review_id}.md。 - 开始前:调用
history-managerskill 的get-phase technical_review和check-file确认是否已完成。 - 完成后:调用
history-managerskill 的set-phase technical_review {technical_review_id}记录并推进状态。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

