agentleFS
QuixiAIQuixiAI/Hexis/skills/installed/skill-authoring/SKILL.md

skill-authoring

Skill623 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Author or revise reusable Hexis skills from repeated successful workflows

89 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use cloud-api-recipe-authoring, codebuddy-ide-mcp-upgrade and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • TencentCloudBaseSkill

    cloud-api-recipe-authoring

    Author or revise a cloud-api-operations recipe (config/source/skills/cloud-api-operations/references/recipes/). Encodes why the long tail of control-plane capabilities is deliberately NOT wrapped as MCP/CLI tools, the API-first admission test for whether a capability deserves a recipe, the negative and positive lists, the fixed recipe structure, the writing rules distilled from writing-for-agents, the user-facing copy red lines, and the product regeneration/verification pipeline. Also routes contributors (and their agents) to the contribution flow and the pre-PR self-test protocol in references/contributing.md. Use when adding a recipe, judging whether a scenario belongs in the recipe set, updating the recipes index, re-checking existing recipes against the admission test, or onboarding someone who wants to submit one.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • TencentCloudBaseSkill

    codebuddy-ide-mcp-upgrade

    升级 CodeBuddy IDE(genie 扩展)内置的 CloudBase MCP,以及 MCP 发版时同步 IDE 侧白名单。当用户提到「更新 IDE 里的 MCP」「内置 MCP 版本太老」「IDE 集成的 CloudBase 功能不足」「改工具白名单 toolWhiteList」「把新 bundle 打进 CodeBuddy」「白名单漂移」「MCP 发版要同步什么」时使用。覆盖:解包定位内置 bundle 与内嵌配置、重新构建 mcp bundle、生成新的工具白名单与系统提示词、安全注入 IDE 并备份、用 MCP 协议验证工具清单、人工端到端验收、一键回滚。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • DIL8654Skill

    api-contract-review

    Review ASP.NET Core Web API contracts for HTTP semantics, versioning, backward compatibility, and response consistency. Use when the user asks to review an API, check endpoints, validate REST behavior, or before releasing contract changes.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • zaxbysauceSkill

    pr-review-fix

    Codex adapter for addressing pull request review feedback in opencode-swarm. Use when the user asks to fix PR review comments, requested changes, reviewer findings, CI-review notes, or a pasted review summary with low false-positive tolerance.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • albertdobmeyerSkill

    git-workflows

    Advanced git operations beyond add/commit/push. Use when rebasing, bisecting bugs, using worktrees for parallel development, recovering with reflog, managing subtrees/submodules, resolving merge conflicts, cherry-picking across branches, or working with monorepos.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • rogue-dev-studioSkill

    frontend-engineering

    Expert frontend application engineering: accessible UI structure, state and data-fetching discipline, form/validation UX, responsive layouts, performance budgets, and integration with API contracts. Use when building or refining SPA/web screens, design-system consumption, client-side routing, or fixing UI reliability (loading, empty, and error states).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +6 more from TencentCloudBase

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 79 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when a repeated workflow, hard-won lesson, or stable procedure should become reusable future behavior.

    line 15
  2. Very specific:

    Check existing skills with list_skills before creating a new one.

    line 28
  3. Distinctive:

    Prefer updating an existing skill when the new behavior is a refinement of the same workflow.

    line 29
  4. Distinctive:

    Write the skill as concise operating instructions:

    line 30
  5. Distinctive:

    when to use it,

    line 31
  6. Very specific:

    Prefer propose_skill for on-demand growth.

    line 36
  7. Very specific:

    Use author_skill directly only when the user has explicitly approved immediate skill-file creation/update in the current exchange.

    line 39
  8. Very specific:

    Never try to replace a user-authored skill.

    line 41
  9. Very specific:

    Use list_skill_proposals to inspect background or on-demand review results.

    line 44
  10. Distinctive:

    Keep a skill focused. If it covers two unrelated workflows, split it.

    line 50
  11. Distinctive:

    Do not encode secrets, credentials, private user data, or one-off facts in a skill.

    line 51
  12. Very specific:

    Do not directly author a live skill from a single unverified attempt unless the user explicitly approves it.

    line 52
  13. Very specific:

    When a workflow needs a capability no existing tool provides, you can build it yourself with create_tool: write a ToolHandler subclass.

    line 58
  14. Distinctive:

    Use it, and patch the skill when experience improves the method.

    line 67

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 79 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Skill Authoring

Use this skill when a repeated workflow, hard-won lesson, or stable procedure should become reusable future behavior. A skill is not a memory note; it is an operational method that can be activated later and can unlock the tools it needs.

When to Use

  • The same multi-step procedure has worked more than once.
  • A user explicitly asks you to make a behavior reusable.
  • A correction reveals a better standard operating procedure.
  • A project develops a durable local convention that should guide future work.
  • You notice a capability gap that should become an operator-reviewable skill, even before there is enough cross-session evidence for background review.

Method

  1. Check existing skills with list_skills before creating a new one.
  2. Prefer updating an existing skill when the new behavior is a refinement of the same workflow.
  3. Write the skill as concise operating instructions:
    • when to use it,
    • what to do,
    • what to avoid,
    • which tools it should unlock.
  4. Bind only the tools the skill genuinely needs. Do not add broad filesystem, shell, or browser access unless the procedure requires it.
  5. Prefer propose_skill for on-demand growth. It creates a pending review item and writes no skill file. This is the normal path when you discover a reusable gap while working.
  6. Use author_skill directly only when the user has explicitly approved immediate skill-file creation/update in the current exchange.
  7. Never try to replace a user-authored skill. author_skill updates only files carrying Hexis ownership provenance; if ownership cannot be verified, choose a new name or leave the exact manual-edit step to the user.
  8. Use list_skill_proposals to inspect background or on-demand review results. Apply, reject, or reopen one only through review_skill_proposal; applying always requires explicit approval and preserves confidence plus source lineage.

Quality Guidelines

  • Keep a skill focused. If it covers two unrelated workflows, split it.
  • Do not encode secrets, credentials, private user data, or one-off facts in a skill.
  • Do not directly author a live skill from a single unverified attempt unless the user explicitly approves it. Use propose_skill instead.
  • Skills should make future behavior clearer and cheaper; if it would add more prompt weight than judgment, keep it as ordinary memory instead.

Growing New Tools (self-extension)

When a workflow needs a capability no existing tool provides, you can build it yourself with create_tool: write a ToolHandler subclass; it is validated, registered immediately (no restart), and persisted for future sessions. Then complete the growth loop:

  1. Author the tool with create_tool.
  2. Bind it into one of your own skills with author_skill (or by updating an existing agent-authored skill) — an unbound tool is a hand you cannot use next session.
  3. Use it, and patch the skill when experience improves the method.

Your authored tools run with the same permissions as your other tools, and every tool or skill you grow is visible to the operator (change journal + inbox notice). tools.allow_dynamic is the operator's master switch for this capability.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.