blitzy-rules
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Generates Blitzy rules packs from the organisation's Qualimetry coding standards (policies, principles, language coding standards) and, on Qualimetry Enterprise, from the rules-based analysis rule set. Each pack is a single JSON object with machine-readable rules for API push and path/content file pairs that mirror a Blitzy rules zip a client can write to disk or a repository. Invoke manually as the blitzy-rules skill.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- analysis-issuesSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- dependency-checkSkill
- review-checkSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
When asked to produce Blitzy rules for a project so that Blitzy generates code compliant with the organisation's standards, follow this …
- Very specific: line 30
Coding standards: Call get_coding_standards_blitzy.
- Very specific: line 36
Analysis rules: Call get_rules_based_analysis_rules_blitzy with:
- Very specific: line 48
If asked to "write the pack to disk", iterate files and create each file at path with its content.
- Distinctive: line 53
Always fetch fresh from the MCP server.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Blitzy Rules Packs
When asked to produce Blitzy rules for a project so that Blitzy generates code compliant with the organisation's standards, follow this workflow.
Step 1: Choose the Pack
- Coding standards pack (both Qualimetry AI and Enterprise): policies, coding principles, and language coding standards. Use
get_coding_standards_blitzy. - Analysis rules pack (Qualimetry Enterprise only): the rules-based analysis rule set for a language. Use
get_rules_based_analysis_rules_blitzy.
Step 2: Fetch the Pack
Coding standards: Call get_coding_standards_blitzy. Returns policies and principles by default; pass languageCodes to add language coding standards. Narrow with:
includePolicies(default true)includePrinciples(default true)languageCodes- comma-separated codes (e.g.csharp,java,python) for the project's language(s). Required to receive language coding standards; if omitted, only policies and principles are returned. Pass the project's primary language(s) so the pack carries the relevant language rules.collapseLanguageFolders(default true) - one folder per language with{category}--{subcategory}.rule.mdfilenames; set false to nest categories as folders
Analysis rules: Call get_rules_based_analysis_rules_blitzy with:
languageCode(required, e.g.csharp)qualityProfileName(optional; blank returns every rule for the language)collapseLanguageFolders(default true) - one folder per language with{type}--{attribute}.rule.mdfilenames
Step 3: Write the Pack
Both tools return one JSON object:
license- the proprietary licence notice (coding-standards pack only). Preserve it; it is also written asLICENSE.mdinfiles.rules- the structured rules for API-based publishing to a Blitzy endpoint.files- an array of{ path, content }pairs that mirror the zip tree. Write each file verbatim to disk (or to the target repository) at itspath, preserving the directory structure.
If asked to "write the pack to disk", iterate files and create each file at path with its content. Do not modify the content.
Important
- The analysis rules pack requires Qualimetry Enterprise; on Qualimetry AI only
get_coding_standards_blitzyis available. - Always fetch fresh from the MCP server; do not reuse a previously generated pack.
For full MCP tool schemas and pack structure, see reference.md.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

