agentleFS
ProxiBlueProxiBlue/claude-skills/workflow-build-feature/SKILL.md

workflow-build-feature

Skill18 starsChanged 36 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

PER-TICKET BUILD workflow for shipping a Magento feature through plan + implement + review + verify + quality-gate stages — but STOPS at 'ready to deploy'. Does NOT push or deploy. The user runs /deploy-check separately when they're ready. Flow: prereq check (wires.json registry-driven, scales to N per-domain playbooks) → branch creation → /hcf:plan-create (devils-advocate consults wired playbooks: codegraph, graphiti, …) → /manual-test-plan posts GitHub ticket comment → /hcf:plan-orchestrate (HCF native — codegraph-reviewer runs as a pipeline.md post-implementation agent rather than per-task wrapper gate) → handoff to /verify-feature (in a fresh thread per skill convention) → CHAINS /proxiblue-skills:workflow-security-audit as a quality gate → completion summary listing all gates passed/failed. Maintains visible TodoWrite list throughout. Pauses at every user-decision boundary. Assumes /proxiblue-skills:workflow-onboard-project has already run. Composable: future quality workflows (perf-audit, dependency-check) can be chained in by editing the QUALITY_GATES list in this skill.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈10

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.