google-calendar-browser-tasks
Skill9 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub
Manage Google Calendar events through the teammate's signed-in browser: create, reschedule and delete with readback verification.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- site/llms-full.txtllms.txt
- site/llms.txtllms.txt
- checked-spreadsheet-analysisSkill
- document-to-action-itemsSkill
- gmail-browser-draftSkill
- google-drive-browser-tasksSkill
- grounded-researchSkill
- meeting-action-itemsSkill
- private-team-reviewSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- todoist-browser-tasksSkill
- weekly-review-planningSkill
- use-mac-appsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Verify the signed-in Google account matches the connected owner before acting.
- Very specific: line 11
Create at the event editor (/calendar/u/0/r/eventedit): title field, start/end date fields, then Save.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Google Calendar in the teammate browser
Use the teammate's own persistent browser profile at calendar.google.com. This method performs real calendar changes, so every write below still needs its normal exact approval first. Single-session discipline: never copy this profile into a second browser in parallel — Google invalidates sessions that appear on two clients at once.
- Verify the signed-in Google account matches the connected owner before acting. On any login wall, "browser may not be secure" rejection, 2FA or unexpected account, stop and request private headed sign-in. Headless automation cannot sign into Google; only reuse an existing headed sign-in.
- Create at the event editor (
/calendar/u/0/r/eventedit): title field, start/end date fields, then Save. Read the new event chip back under its day before claiming success. - Reschedule by opening the event chip, Edit event, changing the date fields, Save. The chip must appear under the new day and be absent under the old day. Same title elsewhere never receives the edit.
- Delete with the detail dialog's Delete control. Guestless events delete immediately; the Undo toast plus the event's absence is the proof. With guests, a cancellation dialog appears: Back to editing, Don't send, or Send the cancellation. The Send choice notifies the approved guests.
- Guests: add addresses through the Guests tab autocomplete and confirm each chip before saving. Saving with guests raises a "send invitation" review: only Send for approved guest lists. Open overlays and invisible suggestion listboxes can swallow the Save click (success response, no effect): press Escape to clear them and retry, and always read back instead of assuming. Verify the guest tree on the saved event. Delivery of invitation and cancellation emails is confirmed by the recipient, not by Calendar.
- State account, event title, date change and guest list in each proposal. Touch only approved events. A toast alone is not proof — day readback is.
Provenance
Sidemates maintained built-in method. Proven in a signed-in teammate browser: private probe event created on Sep 19 and read back, rescheduled to Sep 20 and read back on the new day, deleted and verified absent. Guest flow proven separately: private event with one approved guest, invitation dialog Send, guest present on the saved event, then delete with cancellation Send and verified absent. Instructions are bundled with Sidemates and do not grant tool or account permissions.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

