agentleFS
PostHogKnown publisherPostHog/posthog-foss/.agents/skills/auditing-llm-gateway-parity/SKILL.md

auditing-llm-gateway-parity

Skill727 starsChanged yesterdayMITView on GitHub

Audits services/llm-gateway against PostHog/ai-gateway and updates services/llm-gateway/PARITY.md from current implementation evidence. Use when either gateway changes auth, attribution, billing, endpoints, providers, models, routing, or metadata; when reviewing a Python gateway change; or when asked to refresh, verify, or report gateway parity. This skill updates the parity record but does not migrate callers.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read the current PostHog/ai-gateway main SHA with gh api repos/PostHog/ai-gateway/commits/main and record it as the Go baseline.

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    If the audit is for an in-flight Go change, inspect that PR branch or working tree relative to main.

    line 16
  3. Distinctive:

    Check both request and response behavior.

    line 42
  4. Very specific:

    Do not treat caller-supplied telemetry as trusted policy.

    line 50
  5. Very specific:

    Update services/llm-gateway/PARITY.md with the evidence:

    line 58
  6. Distinctive:

    Add or remove migration-relevant contracts in the parity map.

    line 61
  7. Distinctive:

    Update the source SHAs and verification date.

    line 62
  8. Very specific:

    Keep detailed Go design in PostHog/ai-gateway.

    line 63
  9. Very specific:

    When a gap closes, name obvious caller classes that are newly eligible to migrate.

    line 65

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Auditing LLM gateway parity

Compare the current implementations of both gateways and update services/llm-gateway/PARITY.md. Keep this audit separate from caller migration.

Record source revisions

  • Fetch origin/master and record its SHA as the PostHog baseline.
  • Audit the current working tree, including committed and uncommitted changes relative to that baseline. Do not ignore an in-flight gateway change because it is not on master yet.
  • Read the current PostHog/ai-gateway main SHA with gh api repos/PostHog/ai-gateway/commits/main and record it as the Go baseline.
  • If the audit is for an in-flight Go change, inspect that PR branch or working tree relative to main. Treat its contracts as pending until the change merges; do not record them as currently supported.
  • Otherwise, inspect an authenticated checkout of PostHog/ai-gateway at main.

Audit implementation code. README files and the existing parity table are starting points, not proof.

Inspect each contract

For the Python gateway, inspect:

  • services/llm-gateway/src/llm_gateway/api/ for routes and wire behavior
  • services/llm-gateway/src/llm_gateway/auth/ for accepted credentials
  • services/llm-gateway/src/llm_gateway/db/required_tables.py for the tables the gateway may read; a change adding a table read needs its posthog-cloud-infra SELECT grant landed in every environment first
  • services/llm-gateway/src/llm_gateway/products/config.py for trusted product policy, models, and billing
  • services/llm-gateway/src/llm_gateway/rate_limiting/ for budgets and limits
  • services/llm-gateway/src/llm_gateway/callbacks/ for event attribution
  • posthog/llm/gateway_client.py and real call sites for required contracts

For the Go gateway, inspect:

  • internal/httpapi/routes.go and dispatch packages for API shapes
  • internal/auth/ and internal/principal/ for credential and identity policy
  • internal/httpapi/admission.go, internal/ledger/, and internal/quota/ for billing and limits
  • internal/catalog/, internal/router/, and internal/dispatch/ for models, providers, translation, and failover
  • internal/emitter/ and request parsing for attribution and metadata
  • docs/product.md for intended and deferred contracts, verified against code

Check both request and response behavior. Matching route names do not prove parity for headers, streaming, errors, timeouts, retries, billing, or emitted events.

Classify the evidence

  • ✅ Supported: the Go gateway satisfies the contract.
  • ⛔ Blocking: an active use case would lose auth, trusted attribution, billing policy, API, provider, or wire behavior.
  • 🔎 Verify: support exists, but a caller must confirm configuration or behavior.

Do not treat caller-supplied telemetry as trusted policy. An ai_product event property does not replace product authentication, authorization, or billing.

Do not treat Python's unbilled flag as an automatic blocker. An internal workload can move to Go with a PostHog-owned team credential when debiting that wallet is the intended way to attribute PostHog spend. It is blocked only when it must preserve customer-specific billing policy or must debit no wallet.

For each difference, identify at least one affected use-case class. Remove details that do not change a migration decision.

Update the parity record

Update services/llm-gateway/PARITY.md with the evidence:

  • Move use cases between supported, blocked, and verify sections.
  • Add or remove migration-relevant contracts in the parity map.
  • Update the source SHAs and verification date.
  • Keep detailed Go design in PostHog/ai-gateway.

When a gap closes, name obvious caller classes that are newly eligible to migrate. Do not modify those callers unless the user also asks for migration work. Use /migrating-llm-gateway-callers for that separate job.

Validate

Run:

pnpm exec oxfmt services/llm-gateway/PARITY.md .agents/skills/auditing-llm-gateway-parity/SKILL.md
pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 --config .config/.markdownlint-cli2.jsonc services/llm-gateway/PARITY.md .agents/skills/auditing-llm-gateway-parity/SKILL.md
git diff --check

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.