agentleFS
Sign inStart free
PostHogKnown publisherPostHog/ai-plugin/skills/designing-replay-vision-scanners/SKILL.md

designing-replay-vision-scanners

Skill96 starsChanged 37 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Designs a Replay Vision scanner that produces trustworthy observations: one visible question per scanner, a type chosen from the answer shape, a query that selects only sessions able to answer it, a prompt that demands on-screen proof and allows no or inconclusive, a model picked by the cost of a wrong answer, and a first-batch test pass. Sizing and the create call stay in creating-replay-vision-scanners.\nTRIGGER when: user wants to design, draft, or improve a Replay Vision scanner or its prompt, asks what to scan for, asks why a scanner returns vague observations, or asks an agent to propose scanners for a product.\nDO NOT TRIGGER when: the question and prompt are settled and the job is to size and create (use creating-replay-vision-scanners), the scanner targets one experiment (use scanning-experiments-with-replay-vision), or the job is to read existing observations (use exploring-replay-vision-observations).

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free