supported-version-update
Skill121 starsChanged 5 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Update an existing provider, CLI, SDK, library, or protocol integration to a newer supported version. Use when asked to upgrade supported versions or adapt an integration to a new release; audit upstream release notes and changelogs before implementing. Not for writing the project's own release notes or an installation-only request.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- SDSLeon/lightcodeword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- SDSLeon/lightcode★ 121100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- website/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- website/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- add-providerSkill
- address-pr-feedbackSkill
- commitSkill
- finalizeSkill
- heroui-reactSkill
- interactive-testingSkill
- mobile-appsSkill
- news-lineSkill
- provider-chat-smokeSkill
- pull-requestSkill
- release-notesSkill
- verifySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Before implementation, read the official release notes, changelog, migration guide, and relevant deprecations for every intermediate …
- Distinctive: line 17
When notes are missing, say so and inspect official tag/commit comparisons or published package diffs for the relevant integration and …
- Distinctive: line 25
Follow repository compatibility and versioning rules.
- Very specific: line 34
Prefer qualified steerTurn or a provider-owned ACP promptSteering declaration, with runtime capability negotiation where available.
- Distinctive: line 36
Keep unsupported-at-version and blocked/unverified outcomes separate.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Supported Version Update
Qualify the existing integration against the target release. Installing a package and passing existing tests alone do not establish support for its changed behavior or features.
This is the project-scoped workflow. Follow the repository's AGENTS.md, architecture, versioning rules, and normal review/verification procedures. For a new provider rather than an existing integration, use add-provider.
Establish the Upgrade Range
- Identify the installed version, the version declared or pinned by the project, and the last version actually qualified. Keep these distinct when they differ.
- Resolve the requested target and release channel from official sources. Do not silently substitute an alpha, a different distribution channel, or an older package selected by a registry tag.
- Before implementation, read the official release notes, changelog, migration guide, and relevant deprecations for every intermediate release from the current supported baseline through the target. Include baseline notes when assessing features already available there.
- When notes are missing, say so and inspect official tag/commit comparisons or published package diffs for the relevant integration and dependencies. Check for truncated comparisons. Distinguish inspected package changes from uninspected transitive changes; missing notes or unchanged protocol numbers do not prove unchanged behavior.
- Record the actual executable/package and execution target, including platform, WSL, profile/account, and local/cloud routing where relevant. Obtain approval for network/model usage or changing installed software; qualify candidates in isolated fixtures without restarting active sessions or altering the user's real profile.
Map Changes to the Integration
- Trace applicable changes in launch arguments, authentication, model discovery, capability negotiation, configuration, messages, tools, permissions, MCP, session lifecycle, and persisted formats to their existing consumers.
- Decide which changes already flow through dynamically, which need implementation, and which requested features remain unsupported or unverified.
- Distinguish the upstream application's own UI features from capabilities exposed through its integration protocol. Do not recreate unrelated upstream UI or claim features the protocol does not expose.
- Follow repository compatibility and versioning rules. Reuse provider boundaries and existing extension points; change versions, migrations, or caches only when compatibility requires it.
- Build a baseline-to-target capability/evidence matrix covering changed paths and newly available features. For provider updates, use the complete provider integration surface as the audit inventory, not a mandate for unrelated changes. Include detection/install/update metadata, auth and profiles, native/WSL launch and resume, models/config, attachments/tools/subagents/requests, MCP/skills/plugins, usage/status, renderer controls/localization, and affected desktop/standalone/client contracts.
- Re-audit the applicable established provider lessons, recording an L1-L12 applicability/evidence decision. Check whether old workarounds are still needed and whether newly supported contracts can replace them; preserve old supported artifacts and refresh the affected evidence entry. Reading an old regression is not target-version verification.
Requalify Provider Steering
For providers accepting user input while working, always complete native steering qualification, even if the existing adapter uses cancel-and-resend or already exposes native steering.
- Trace the actual supervisor-owned mid-turn input path and compare it with current and target-version SDK/protocol capabilities. Explicitly check whether native steering already exists but is unwired, or was introduced in a newer supported release. Missing adapter code is not proof of upstream lack of support.
- Prefer qualified
steerTurnor a provider-owned ACPpromptSteeringdeclaration, with runtime capability negotiation where available. Keep vendor parsing in the provider boundary and preserve older supported handshakes. Document the tested-version reason and interruption limitations for any remaining fallback. - Prove a steer during actual in-flight work preserves the same running subagent where supported, independently prove explicit Stop cancels, and verify rejected/racing/repeated requests and attachment handling do not drop or duplicate input. Repeated native usage replies must not double-count consumption; distinct samples must remain distinct.
- Keep unsupported-at-version and blocked/unverified outcomes separate. Do not infer support from a version number alone or describe a skipped live gate as passing.
Implement and Verify
Make the required compatibility changes and support the requested features within the authorized scope. Preserve existing settings and user data, and use the repository's normal review and verification workflows. For provider work, follow provider isolation, provider runtime, and provider notes; reuse capability options/hooks instead of provider-name branches in shared code.
Cover changed behavior with relevant regression tests, including prior-version artifacts when a compatibility boundary changes. Use the real integration when mocks cannot prove the requested behavior; exercise the lifecycle and feature paths affected by the upgrade. Keep previous-version, target-version, mocked, and live evidence distinct.
For affected provider paths, run the applicable provider chat smoke / interactive testing gates, including reconnect/resume and actual steering/Stop timing. Check desktop/standalone composition and impacted client contracts rather than assuming a renderer test proves them. Follow i18n for changed renderer strings and the versioning checklist for every persisted/wire/helper boundary. Stop this run's processes and clean up disposable fixtures after preserving cited evidence in tmp/.
An error that stops reproducing after an upgrade is evidence of recovery, not proof of its original cause. Attribute a fix to a particular upstream change only when logs, source, or a controlled reproduction support that attribution.
Report
State the baseline and target, link the upstream sources reviewed, summarize relevant changes and their integration impact, and name what was verified and what remains unsupported or untested. Identify missing release notes and evidence limits explicitly. Do not report a full release audit or complete feature support when only part was checked. For provider work, include the actual steering path, version/capability evidence, same-child/Stop results, fallback limitations, affected clients, and compatibility decisions. Do not commit, publish, or change global skills unless asked.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

